Tags: unemployment

175K of 244K New Jobs ‘Made Up’

Editor’s Note: The Bureau of Labor Stats who releases the unemployment numbers has an adjustment called the birth/death model, which is a guess of how many jobs new businesses that MIGHT have been created during the month could possibly have created. For April 2011, the adjustment was 175,000, meaning of the 244,000 jobs allegedly created in April, almost 3/4 of them were fictitious in nature and not backed up by any concrete data, polling, or observation. This is all part of the ‘management of expectations’ undertaking by the Fed and our government.

And don’t forget that McDonald’s hired 62,000 workers in April.. Once again, the spin masters will make this come up roses when this report is very suspect.

May 6 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. economy added more jobs than forecast in April, easing concern that higher fuel prices are slowing the economic recovery.

Payrolls increased by 244,000 workers last month, the biggest gain since May 2010, after a revised 221,000 gain the prior month, the Labor Department said today in Washington. Economists projected an April rise of 185,000, according to the median estimate in a Bloomberg News survey. Employment excluding government jobs jumped the most in five years. The jobless rate rose to 9 percent, the first increase since November.

More jobs and rising wages may give households, whose spending accounts for 70 percent of the economy, the means to overcome the highest gasoline prices in almost three years. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and some of his colleagues have signaled they plan to forge ahead through June with record monetary stimulus to bolster the expansion.

“The labor market has finally moved into sustainable- growth mode,” Guy LeBas, chief fixed-income strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott LLC in Philadelphia, said before the report. “We can expect growth numbers to be positive.”

Stock-index futures rose and Treasuries fell after the report. The contract on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index expiring in June climbed 0.8 percent to 1,345.4 at 8:44 a.m. in New York. The yield on the benchmark 10-year note increased to 3.22 percent from 3.15 percent.

Range of Estimates

Payroll estimates in the Bloomberg survey of 86 economists ranged from gains of 118,000 to 325,000. March was revised up from a previously reported gain of 216,000, and February payrolls increased 235,000 after a prior estimate of 194,000.

The unemployment rate was projected to hold at 8.8 percent, according to the survey median.

Private hiring, which excludes government agencies, rose by 268,000 in April, more than the 200,000 median forecast in the Bloomberg survey and the most since February 2006, after a 231,000 increase in March.

The separate survey of households showed the size of the labor force was little changed in April and employment shrank by 190,000. That pushed the share of the population in the labor force down to 58.4 percent from 58.5 percent a month earlier.

Government payrolls decreased by 24,000 last month. Local government employment dropped by 14,000.

Factory payrolls increased by 29,000 last month, more than the survey forecast of a 20,000 gain, after a 22,000 rise in March.

Service Employment

Employment at service-providers rose 200,000 in April after a 184,000 gain the prior month. The health care industry added 37,300 workers in April. Construction payrolls rose 5,000 and retail trade employment increased 57,100. The gain at retailers may have reflected the effects of an Easter holiday that occurred later this year than last, making seasonal adjustment difficult for Labor Department.

Some companies are adding workers. Norfolk Southern Corp. is expanding payrolls as the fourth-biggest U.S. railroad benefits from an economic expansion that’s boosting shipping volumes. First-quarter profit excluding some items was $1 a share, topping the 90-cent average estimate from 27 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.

“We still have a need for additional employees for the business that we’ve got out there,” Mark Manion, chief operating officer of Norfolk Southern, said in an April 27 teleconference. “There is a need to hire for our current business as well as hiring for the growth that’s anticipated in the first — this year and on into 2012.”

Bernanke on Jobs

While payrolls have grown each month since October, Bernanke said on April 27 that central bankers would like to see more strength in the U.S. job market, noting that a recovery has been “quite slow.”

“The labor market is improving gradually,” Bernanke said to reporters during the first-ever press conference following a Federal Open Market Committee meeting. “We would like to make sure that that is sustainable. The longer it goes on, the more confident we are.”

Economic growth slowed to a 1.8 percent annual rate in the first quarter after expanding at a 3.1 percent pace in the last three months of 2010, according to Commerce Department figures.

Regular fuel was $3.99 a gallon on May 4, the highest since July 2008, according to AAA, the nation’s biggest motoring organization. Food costs rose 0.8 percent in March, also the most since July 2008, consumer-price index data from the Labor Department showed last month.

Underemployment Rate

The so-called underemployment rate — which includes part- time workers who’d prefer a full-time position and people who want work but have given up looking — rose to 15.9 percent from 15.7 percent, today’s report showed.

The report also showed a decrease in long-term unemployed Americans. The number of people unemployed for 27 weeks or more fell to 43.4 percent of all job-seekers from 45.5 percent a month earlier.

While companies stepped up hiring, earnings increased. Average hourly earnings climbed to $22.95 in April, today’s report showed, while the average work week for all employees held at 34.3 hours.

Jobless Claims Soar on ‘One Time’ Events

Editor’s Note: Funny, when the numbers go badly, then everything is blamed on one-time events, but when the numbers show what the press wants, then it is a healthy recovery that is causing it. Sure the Japan situation and the auto shutdown might be isolated in nature, however, initial claims have been trending decidedly higher for the past month or so now..

May 5 (Bloomberg) — The number of claims for U.S. unemployment benefits unexpectedly rose last week, pushed up by auto-plant shutdowns and other unusual events that seasonal variations failed to take into account, the Labor Department said.

Applications for jobless benefits jumped by 43,000 to 474,000 in the week ended April 30, the most since August, Labor Department figures showed today. A spring break holiday in New York, a new emergency benefits program in Oregon and auto shutdowns caused by the disaster in Japan were the main reasons for the surge, a Labor Department spokesman said as the data was released to the press.

Even before last week, claims had drifted up, raising concern the improvement in the labor market has stalled. Employers added 185,000 workers to payrolls in April, fewer than in the prior month, and the unemployment rate held at 8.8 percent, economists project a Labor Department report to show tomorrow.

“April seems to have shown a little bit of a slowdown,” Thomas Simons, an economist at Jefferies Group Inc. in New York, said before the report. “We haven’t seen as rapid an improvement in the labor market as we’ve seen in previous months.”

Stock-index futures dropped after the report. The contract on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index maturing in June fell 0.6 percent to 1,334.5 at 8:37 a.m. in New York. Treasury securities rose, sending the yield on the benchmark 10-year note down to 3.16 percent from 3.22 percent late yesterday.

Exceeds Forecasts

Economists forecast 410,000 claims, according to the median estimate in a Bloomberg News survey. Forecasts ranged from 395,000 to 450,000 in the survey of 46 economists. The Labor Department revised the prior week’s figure up to 431,000 from an initially reported 429,000.

A spring break holiday at schools in the state of New York prompted workers to file claims, which the seasonal adjustment factors didn’t expect last week, the Labor Department official said. In addition, Oregon began a new emergency benefits program for the long-term unemployed that also pulled in some new claimants, he said. Finally, auto plant shutdowns due to parts shortages caused by the earthquake and tsunami in Japan also contributed to the increase, the official said.

The productivity of U.S. workers slowed in the first quarter and labor costs rose as a growing economy prompted companies to boost employment, another report from the Labor Department showed today.

Productivity Cools

The measure of employee output per hour increased at a 1.6 percent annual rate, after a 2.9 percent gain in the prior three months. Expenses per employee climbed at a 1 percent rate after dropping 1 percent.

The four-week moving average for jobless claims, a less- volatile measure, rose to 431,250 from 409,000.

The number of people continuing to collect jobless benefits rose by 74,000 in the week ended April 23 to 3.73 million. The continuing claims figure does not include the number of workers receiving extended benefits under federal programs.

Those who’ve used up their traditional benefits and are now collecting emergency and extended payments decreased by about 42,900 to 4.12 million in the week ended April 16.

Jobless Rate

The unemployment rate among people eligible for benefits, which tends to track the jobless rate, rose to 3 percent in the week ended April 23 from 2.9 percent, today’s report showed. Twenty states and territories reported an increase in claims, while 33 had a decrease.

Initial jobless claims reflect weekly firings and tend to fall as job growth — measured by the monthly non-farm payrolls report — accelerates. These data are reported with a one-week lag.

Employers announced fewer job cuts in April than the same month last year, Chicago-based Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc. said yesterday. Planned firings decreased 4.8 percent to 36,490 last month from April 2010.

“Employment has begun to show signs of improvement,” Scott Davis, chief executive officer of United Parcel Service Inc., said during an April 26 call with analysts. “In the U.S., unemployment dipped below 9 percent for the first time in almost two years, further evidence that the recovery continues.”

While payrolls have grown each month since October, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said on April 27 that central bankers would like to see more strength in the U.S. labor market, noting that a recovery has been “quite slow.”

Gradual Improvement

“The labor market is improving gradually,” Bernanke said to reporters during the first-ever press conference following a Federal Open Market Committee meeting. “We would like to make sure that that is sustainable. The longer it goes on, the more confident we are.”

Another report yesterday showed employment at U.S. companies increased 179,000 in April, the smallest gain in five months, according to ADP Employer Services.

Federal Reserve Bank of Boston President Eric Rosengren yesterday said record stimulus is necessary to spur the “anemic” economy and that raising interest rates to combat increasing food and fuel prices would impede growth.

“With significant slack in labor markets, stable inflation expectations, and core inflation well below our longer run target, there is currently no reason to slow the economy down with tighter monetary policy,” Rosengren said during a speech in Boston.

Cisco Systems Inc., the largest maker of computer- networking equipment, is among companies trying to cut costs. The San Jose, California-based company last week said it is offering early-retirement packages to some employees in the U.S. and Canada. The company didn’t specify how many workers it expected to take the packages or how much would be saved.

Reich: Beware the Double-Dip

Why aren’t Americans being told the truth about the economy? We’re heading in the direction of a double dip — but you’d never know it if you listened to the upbeat messages coming out of Wall Street and Washington.

Consumers are 70 percent of the American economy, and consumer confidence is plummeting. It’s weaker today on average than at the lowest point of the Great Recession.

The Reuters/University of Michigan survey shows a 10 point decline in March — the tenth largest drop on record. Part of that drop is attributable to rising fuel and food prices. A separate Conference Board’s index of consumer confidence, just released, shows consumer confidence at a five-month low — and a large part is due to expectations of fewer jobs and lower wages in the months ahead.

Pessimistic consumers buy less. And fewer sales spells economic trouble ahead.

What about the 192,000 jobs added in February? (We’ll know more Friday about how many jobs were added in March.) It’s peanuts compared to what’s needed. Remember, 125,000 new jobs are necessary just to keep up with a growing number of Americans eligible for employment. And the nation has lost so many jobs over the last three years that even at a rate of 200,000 a month we wouldn’t get back to 6 percent unemployment until 2016.

But isn’t the economy growing again — by an estimated 2.5 to 2.9 percent this year? Yes, but that’s even less than peanuts. The deeper the economic hole, the faster the growth needed to get back on track. By this point in the so-called recovery we’d expect growth of 4 to 6 percent.

Consider that back in 1934, when it was emerging from the deepest hole of the Great Depression, the economy grew 7.7 percent. The next year it grew over 8 percent. In 1936 it grew a whopping 14.1 percent.

Add two other ominous signs: Real hourly wages continue to fall, and housing prices continue to drop. Hourly wages are falling because with unemployment so high, most people have no bargaining power and will take whatever they can get. Housing is dropping because of the ever-larger number of homes people have walked away from because they can’t pay their mortgages. But because homes the biggest asset most Americans own, as home prices drop most Americans feel even poorer.

There’s no possibility government will make up for the coming shortfall in consumer spending. To the contrary, government is worsening the situation. State and local governments are slashing their budgets by roughly $110 billion this year. The federal stimulus is ending, and the federal government will end up cutting some $30 billion from this year’s budget.

In other words: Watch out. We may avoid a double dip but the economy is slowing ominously, and the booster rockets are disappearing.

So why aren’t we getting the truth about the economy? For one thing, Wall Street is buoyant — and most financial news you hear comes from the Street. Wall Street profits soared to $426.5 billion last quarter, according to the Commerce Department. (That gain more than offset a drop in the profits of non-financial domestic companies.) Anyone who believes the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill put a stop to the Street’s creativity hasn’t been watching.

To the extent non-financial companies are doing well, they’re making most of their money abroad. Since 1992, for example, G.E.’s offshore profits have risen $92 billion, from $15 billion (which is one reason it pays no U.S. taxes). In fact, the only group that’s optimistic about the future are CEOs of big American companies. The Business Roundtable’s economic outlook index, which surveys 142 CEOs, is now at its highest point since it began in 2002.

Washington, meanwhile, doesn’t want to sound the economic alarm. The White House and most Democrats want Americans to believe the economy is on an upswing.

Republicans, for their part, worry that if they tell it like it is Americans will want government to do more rather than less. They’d rather not talk about jobs and wages, and put the focus instead on deficit reduction (or spread the lie that by reducing the deficit we’ll get more jobs and higher wages).

I’m sorry to have to deliver the bad news, but it’s better you know.

Behind the Numbers – Labor Participation

Published on: 02/04/2011
Categories: Current Events, Economics
Comments: No Comments

Editor’s Note: This explains in totality the lower unemployment rate. People are not finding jobs like the media would have you believe, rather, they are falling off the wagon and are no longer being counted in the labor force. This is an awful prognostic indicator, one we’ve been warning about for over two years now.

From ZeroHedge..

At 64.2%, the labor force participation rate (as a percentage of the total civilian noninstitutional population) is now at a fresh 26 year low, the lowest since March 1984, and is the only reason why the unemployment rate dropped to 9% (labor force declined from 153,690 to 153,186). Those not in the Labor Force has increased from 83.9 million to 86.2 million, or 2.2 million in one year! As for the numerator in the fraction, the number of unemployed, it has plunged from 15 million to 13.9 million in two months! The only reason for this is due to the increasing disenchantment of those who completely fall off the BLS rolls and no longer even try to look for a job. Lastly, we won’t even show what the labor force is as a percentage of total population. It is a vertical plunge.

Payrolls Decrease in 28 States; Unemployment Rises in 21

Published on: 12/19/2010
Categories: Current Events, Economics
Comments: 1 Comment

Payrolls decreased in 28 U.S. states and the unemployment rate climbed in 21, showing most parts of the world’s largest economy took part in the November labor- market setback.

North Carolina led the nation with 12,500 job cuts last month, followed by Massachusetts with 8,600 dismissals, and Ohio with 7,800, figures from the Labor Department showed today in Washington. Joblessness increased most in Georgia and Idaho, while workers in Nevada faced the highest rate in the country at 14.3 percent.

The report is consistent with figures on Dec. 3 that showed unemployment increased last month for the first time since August. The Federal Reserve’s pledge to buy an additional $600 billion of Treasuries by June and the $858 billion bill passed by Congress extending all Bush-era tax cuts for two years may help boost growth and cut unemployment.

The report shows “an uneven distribution of improvement with some disappointing results,” said Russell Price, a senior economist at Ameriprise Financial Inc. in Detroit. “We’ve seen pretty clear evidence that demand is starting to improve and with the tax program that was passed last night it should further accelerate. That increased demand is going to pull forward further improvements in employment.”

Leading Index

Another report showed the economy is poised to pick up in 2011. The index of leading economic indicators increased 1.1 percent in November, the biggest gain in eight months, the New York-based Conference said today. The reading matched the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News.

After Nevada, the jobless rate was highest in California and Michigan at 12.4 percent, today’s report from the Labor Department showed. Michigan, which is part of the so-called manufacturing Rust Belt, saw its unemployment rate drop by 0.4 percentage point, pushing it to the lowest level since February 2009, as the labor force shrank by 19,500 workers.

Yahoo! Inc., owner of the largest U.S. Web portal, is among companies still trimming payrolls. The firm is cutting about 600 jobs, or about 4 percent of its workforce, part of an almost two-year turnaround effort. The notification process began on Dec. 14 and most of the cuts will come from the product group, said Kim Rubey, a spokeswoman for Sunnyvale, California-based Yahoo.

Unemployment in North Dakota, the lowest in the U.S., was unchanged at 3.8 percent.

November Payrolls

The Labor Department’s Dec. 3 report showed payrolls increased by 39,000 in November, less than the most pessimistic forecast of economists surveyed at the time by Bloomberg News, and the jobless rate climbed to 9.8 percent, the highest since April.

State and local employment data are derived independently from the national statistics, which are typically released on the first Friday of every month. The state figures are subject to larger sampling errors because they come from smaller surveys, making the national figures more reliable, according to the government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Today’s report showed Texas led states with the biggest payroll gains as employers added 19,100 workers. New Jersey was second with an increase of 10,000.

The jobless rate held at 9.2 percent in New Jersey, rose to 8.3 percent from 8.2 percent in New York, and fell to 9 percent from 9.1 percent in Connecticut.

Unemployment in Georgia climbed by 0.3 percentage point to 10.1 percent in November after having fallen in the previous two months. Idaho’s rate climbed by the same amount to 9.4 percent, just short of the almost three-decade high of 9.5 percent reached in February.

My Two Cents – The Great Currency Wars

On 9/18/2009 I wrote an editorial called ‘The Quiet Grab’. It discussed China’s deal cutting on the natural resources front, specifically in the rare earth element and petroleum sectors. The article pointed out that the Chinese were quietly provisioning ready supplies of strategic assets for the turmoil that lay ahead, particularly arising from a disdain and mistrust of paper instruments, especially currencies. With the USFed’s second iteration of quantitative easing now underway, the currency battles are starting to heat up and so is the rhetoric. This week we take a look at the ongoing (and intensifying) currency wars, strategic assets, and why we are behind the proverbial eight ball.

The Return of 1930’s Style Protectionism?

This morning, the head of the World Trade Organization (WTO), General Pascal Lamy, weighed in with that group’s position on currency wars.

Generating employment “is at the heart of the strategy of some countries to keep their currencies undervalued,” Lamy said in New Delhi. “Just as it is also at the heart of other countries’ loose monetary policies.”
Competitive devaluations, which have raised fears of a global currency war, could trigger “tit-for-tat protectionism”, he told a business audience.

What Lamy and most economists and policymakers neither want to acknowledge nor deal with is that their great paradigm of ‘borrow and spend to prosperity’ is broken. His argument that countries like China want to keep currencies cheap to export is absolutely true. His position that the USFed’s decision to try to keep the Dollar cheap is borne out of a desire to ‘stimulate’ the economy is also spot on. Where he misses the boat are on the causes for the current predicament, the very existence of his employer being front and center as a major contributor.

China is the World’s Biggest Wal-Mart

Not only do the Chinese provide the vast majority of the consumer goods on Wal-Mart’s shelves, they’ve stolen a page or two from the mega-retailer’s playbook. Or perhaps Wal-Mart swiped China’s modus operandi, but it really doesn’t matter. China has for years now been flooding the developed world with cheap goods and, with the cooperation of first world politicians, has been driving manufacturing jobs to the Third World. This has been done much in the same way Wal-Mart has destroyed thousands of Mom and Pop stores throughout the nation. They go into an area, undercut local businesses on price, put them out of business and then establish monopoly power. They don’t even need to raise prices once the competition is destroyed. Economies of scale produce sizable profits all on their own.

China is doing much the same thing. This is one of the reasons they have been ready and willing to buy our Treasuries for so long. It provided them with the ability to undergo their very own industrial revolution and establish a bridgehead as the world’s manufacturing power. In the process, how many American industries have fallen by the wayside? Too many to count. And we’re not their only trading partner either. Less than 25% of China’s exports actually made it to North America in 2007. That is a staggering revelation for most people, as we tend to believe that the Chinese somehow ‘need’ us to consume their products.

The Destination of China's Exports

But China has her own problems. Their cheap currency, while enabling significant export gains, has also touched off a wave of domestic inflation, which is being manifested right now in politically sensitive soaring food prices. Americans should take note here.

America’s Ridiculous Demand

Perhaps the most ironic occurrence in the early stages of the currency war is the exhortations by American politicians and central bankers. They are demanding that China allow its currency to appreciate, which would in effect make it easier for American companies to export to China. We do export a significant amount of heavy equipment to China, as does Germany. After all, someone needs to provide the Chinese manufacturing machine with capital equipment.

But there is much more to this than meets the eye and that is where we all need to be paying attention. Think about what Bernanke, and many members of Congress are asking for. When they demand that China allow their currency to appreciate, they are in effect demanding that the Dollar be depreciated. They are saying essentially “Yes Mr. Jiabao; we want the Dollar to be worth less so Mr. and Mrs. America will have to pay more for your imported goods when they go to the store”. This flies totally in the face of the robotic ‘A strong dollar is in the national interest’ phrase uttered by Hank Paulson in what seems to be an eternity ago now.

USD/CNY Pair - Yuan stagnation

In this reality lies the essence of our current problem. We have a choice. Our government is taking a stance that we can create jobs by depreciating the Dollar and somehow that is going to overcome the massive increase in costs of imports. This might work if we weren’t such an import-driven society, but that is certainly not the case. And it isn’t just the Chinese we import from either. Think crude oil and refined gasoline products. At current import rates and oil prices, we import almost $900 Million per day just in petroleum. That is around $27 Billion per month. We’ve seen what the devaluation of the Dollar has done to the jobs picture in just the past five years. Does any person with two brain cells to rub together really expect this nonsense to work?

Strategic Assets Trump Cash?

We are reaching the point where I believe the quiet grab by the Chinese over the past decade in terms of strategic assets is about to pay off. Anyone who runs a manufacturing operation knows that stable input prices and supplies are a key component of that business’ long-term success. Obviously any manufacturing operation built using the petroleum paradigm is going to use plenty of black gold. The same goes for a world that is hooked on handheld gadgets and green technology. Most hybrid owners don’t realize the amount of exploration, provisioning, and drilling/mining that goes into finding the materials necessary to make the high tech components of their vehicles. The same goes for the owners of the vast majority of consumer electronics. We just don’t think about it. The Chinese have. By virtue of their location, they have roughly 95% of the world’s rare earth elements at their disposal. They’ve locked down supplies of crude oil to fuel their manufacturing empire, at least in the short to medium term. Who really thinks the United States is going to win a trade war, a currency war, or any type of economic war with the Chinese at this point?

Given these realities, and how all of these circumstances are woven together, we can already be pretty sure of how the great currency wars will turn out. Those with the advantages will use them and those at a disadvantage with posture, pander, and talk. But in the end, talk is cheap.

Chart of the Day

Published on: 10/27/2010
Categories: Current Events, Economics
Comments: No Comments

Anyone who cares to see who received the benefits of the stimulus needs to look no further….
Stimulus Recipients

‘Broke’ UK to axe 500,000 Bureaucrats

Published on: 10/20/2010
Categories: Current Events, Economics
Comments: No Comments

Chancellor George Osborne is to slash welfare benefits by a further £7bn as he sets out the biggest spending cuts since World War Two.

The pension age will rise sooner than expected, some incapacity benefits will be time limited and other money clawed back through changes to tax credits and housing benefit.

A new bank levy will also be brought in – with full details due on Thursday.

Mr Osborne said the four year cuts were guided by fairness, reform and growth.

The 19% average cuts to departmental budgets were less severe than the 25% expected – thanks to bigger savings from the welfare budget, the chancellor told MPs.

He claimed this meant his plans were less than the 20% cuts Labour had planned ahead of the general election.

Unveiling his Spending Review in the Commons, which includes £81bn in spending cuts, he told MPs: “Today is the day when Britain steps back from the brink, when we confront the bills from a decade of debt.”

He added: “It is a hard road, but it leads to a better future.”

Universal benefits for pensioners will be retained exactly as budgeted for by the previous government and the temporary increase in the cold weather payment will be made permanent.

But a planned rise in state pension age for men and women to 66 by the year 2020, will be brought forward, with a gradual increase in the State Pension Age from 65 to 66, starting in 2018.

Up to 500,000 public sector jobs could go by 2014-15 due to the changes, according to the Office for Budgetary Responsibility.

Mr Osborne has not set out in detail where the jobs will go but he admitted there will be some redundancies in the public sector, which he said were unavoidable when the country had run out of money.

Bank levy

He has set out extensive cuts to individual government departments – including:

  • Home Office – 6% cuts, with police spending down by 4% each year of the spending settlement
  • Foreign Office – 24% cut through reduction in the number of Whitehall-based diplomats and back office costs
  • HM Revenue and Customs – 15% through the better use of new technology and greater efficiency

The Department for International Development’s budget will rise to £11.5bn over the next four years, reaching 0.7% of national income in 2013.

Each government department will next month publish a business plan setting out reform plans for the next four years.

Plans for a 1,500 place new prison have been dropped, he said.

The government will also deliver £6bn of Whitehall savings – double the £3bn promised earlier, said the chancellor.

There will be overall savings in funding to local councils of 7.1%, but ring-fencing of all local government revenue grants will end from April next year, except for simplified schools grants and a public health grant.

The Spending Review is the culmination of months of heated negotiations with ministers over their departmental budgets and comes a day after the Ministry of Defence and the BBC learned their financial fate.

‘Irresponsible gamble’

The MoD is facing cuts of 8% – less than most other departments but enough to mean 42,000 service personnel and civil servants will lose their jobs over the next five years and high-profile equipment such as Harrier jump jets, the Ark Royal aircraft carrier and Nimrod spy planes will be scrapped.

The BBC has been told it must freeze the licence fee for six years and take over the cost of the World Service, currently funded by the Foreign Office, and the Welsh language TV channel S4C. This adds up to an estimated 16% cut in the BBC’s budget in real terms.

The chancellor insists tough action on spending is needed to stave off a debt crisis – and that the private sector will create new jobs to fill the void.

Labour would also have had to make major cuts if it had won the general election, but the party insists Mr Osborne’s plans are too aggressive and risk tipping the country into a “double dip” recession. 

Labour leader Ed Miliband accused the chancellor of taking an “irresponsible gamble with our economy and, indeed, many of the frontline services people rely on.”

Health spending and international development will also be protected from cuts – and Mr Osborne has pledged funding for big infrastructure projects like London’s Crossrail project and the Mersey Gateway road bridge between Runcorn and Widnes.

But Energy Secretary Chris Huhne has confirmed a £30bn 10-mile barrage across the Severn estuary, intended to generate renewable electricity, has been axed on the grounds of cost.

What is your reaction to the cuts already announced? Will you be watching the chancellor’s statement? Send us your comments using the form below and if you are willing to be interviewed by the BBC, please leave a contact number. It will not be published.

2009 Jobs Losses Probably Worse than Reported – Reuters

Published on: 10/07/2010
Categories: Current Events, Economics
Comments: No Comments

(Reuters) – The economy likely shed more jobs last year than previously thought, but analysts say the undercount by the government should prove less severe than it did during depths of the recession.

The Labor Department on Friday will give an initial estimate of how far off its count of employment may have been in the 12 months through March. The government admitted earlier this year that its count through March 2009 had overstated employment by 902,000 jobs.

Analysts expect a much smaller miscount this time, given the economy’s growth spurt in the second half of last year.

The department blamed its 902,000 miss on faulty estimates of how many companies were created or destroyed, and it has not yet made any changes to the so-called birth-death model that produces this projection.

Once a year, it compares payroll data from its monthly surveys of employers with unemployment insurance tax reports, which give it a much more comprehensive view of actual employment. It uses these tax records to produce a “benchmark revision” to adjust for discrepancies.

“That adjustment is probably overstating the employment gains because we are in a very subdued recovery and the likelihood is that the birth-death factor is making the data look better than it otherwise would be,” said Neil Dutta, an economist at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch in New York.

Tax records will probably show more businesses closed than initially estimated by the Labor Department, analysts said.

“It’s not going to be that severe (as last time). A lot of it is sort of aligned with the performance in the broader economy,” Dutta said, noting that the economy picked up in the second half of 2009 and entered this year strongly.

Other economists shared that view, while some said it was even possible that employment would be revised upward, citing other data, including a separate Labor Department survey of households, that had outperformed the monthly payrolls count.

They also said that while the department had not changed the birth-death model, it had incorporated new data from a period in which business start-ups were weak.

“Potentially, the model could have underpredicted for a time. With the incorporation of this new data you may see an upward revision,” said Zach Pandl, U.S. economist at Nomura Securities International in New York.

“In our view, the risks are tilted toward an upward revision.”

Whatever the outcome, it will probably have little implication for U.S. monetary policy, given that it is backward-looking and the economic recovery is very weak by historical standards.

But it could shed more light on the nature of the unemployment problem confronting the economy, with opinion increasingly divided on whether it is cyclical or structural.

Analysts will be looking at the sectors where job losses are concentrated. Steeper job losses than already reported in manufacturing and construction could strengthen the argument of a structural unemployment problem.

Only It Didn’t

The powers that be are now starting to be shown what should be a very important lesson in the old saying: “You can fool all of the people some of the time and you can fool some of the people all of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time”. For a year and a half now, starting at a rather well defined point in time during early March 2009, the govermedia switched gears and pronounced that the shattered American economy was in recovery.

The perceptive ears on Wall Street picked up on this rather quickly and the markets reversed and headed higher. Consumers bought it not only because they’d bought almost anything that moved for nearly a decade and a half, but frankly, because they wanted to. The doomsday talk was really putting a damper on the consumption party, and well hey, let’s pass out the credit cards and get it rolling again. It would have seemed as if the powers that be had created another blowout, profited from it, bailed themselves out at taxpayer expense, then with a few crafty words and graphics on the telescreen kick start the next phase. It was all set up to happen perfectly.

Consumer Credit

Only it didn’t.

The consumer bit for a while, but never fully embraced the idea of the jobless recovery. Many times over the past year, these pages were filled with wonderment at the unmitigated gall of an establishment that would think that a man without a means to make a living, unable to support his family, would hike out his credit card and march off to the store and forget about it all. It defied logic. Yet that was what was supposed to happen.

Only it didn’t.

In early 2009, the federal government handed out cash to consumers and instead of spending it, consumers saved it, paid down debt, bought Gold or any number of a hundred things other than doing what they were ‘supposed’ to do with it, namely spending it. I joked at the time that because of non-compliance, the next stimulus would be store gift cards. While we haven’t gotten there yet, there has been zero talk of another round of checks.

This should send a very clear signal that our government, a miserable failure in doing anything to help our economy, STILL thinks it can spend your money better than you can. Look at recent actions this week as our government decided to pull the ultimate robbing of Peter to pay Paul when it swiped $12 Billion from the food stamps program to give bailouts to the teachers’ union and other state and local employees.

And even this will not last. States are still broke. What happens when this money is spent? The same thing as when the last stimulus money was exhausted. We’re right back where we started with nothing to show except more kicking of the can down the road and a hefty bill for our children and grandchildren. Larry Kotlikoff’s article on Bloomberg this week nailed it – We’re broke and we don’t even know it. The fiscal gap, now at $202 trillion, is up roughly $17 trillion in the last 6 months.

The debt function is going parabolic and yet there are still people on TV on a daily basis screaming that America has the strongest economy in the world. If a fiscal gap that represents almost 15 years of GDP is considered the strongest, then I’d hate to see what the weakest looks like. It is repeated like Newspeak in the hopes that some of it will stick.

Yet there truly is a dichotomy going on in America. Take a trip to the local shopping mall and you’ll see people snapping up the latest iGadgets, consumer electronics, and other ‘necessities’. Yet retail sales are flat. Granted, much of the spending is being done on deeply discounted items, but there is something worth mentioning here. There is a silver lining in all this. If you are one of those people who have been responsible (and fortunate) and have savings and some extra cash for discretionary spending, there has never been a better time. America is on sale – literally, and in more ways than one. Don’t get too excited though; the silver linings pretty much end right there.

In recent weeks, almost on perfect cue, the mainstream press started playing up the ‘Double Dip’ card. They even trotted out the relic Alan Greenspan for a few sound bytes. The buzzword is now deflation. M3 is contracting (albeit bouncing somewhat in the past few weeks). M1 growth is falling, and M2 is hovering very close to the zero-growth area. The banks are being blamed for hoarding bailout dollars and not lending to consumers and businesses. Funny thing though, it is the Fed who is incentivizing this behavior by paying the banks to keep their money there and it is the same Fed who is working on a ‘bank CD’ system to pay the banks an even higher return for not lending.

Monetary Aggregates

Something ought to ring patently false then when Ben Bernanke gets up on his soapbox and talks about the need for lending by banks. Yet no one in Congress has the fortitude to ask these tough questions save for Ron Paul and perhaps one or two others. The Fed knows our economy is built on inflation, credit, and increasing money supply, yet in similar fashion to the 1930’s, the Fed is actually encouraging deflation through a number of its policies while talking about overall easing through its pursed lips and crossed fingers.

I realize that this is heresy to the many people who talk about quantitative easing and hyperinflation as being a certainty. The truth is that the banking system creates much more inflation than the Fed, and right now the banking system isn’t doing it. Granted, the Fed is doing QE through a variety of channels – if it were not, we’d have crashed a long time ago. But to be fair, most of that QE has been for the purposes of saving banks and related institutions rather than helping consumers and the economy. I think everyone can agree on that point.

Again, one must ask serious questions about the Fed and its true purposes. The latest talk is that the Fed is worried about the recovery. The last time I checked, the Fed’s ONLY two mandates were price stability and maximum employment, not micromanaging the economy. They’ve done a lousy job on both counts, but have painted a picture of a slow, but steady recovery that would get fuel from borrowed money, stimulus, and the last of the age of consumer largesse. It was all supposed to happen just like that.

Only it didn’t.

page 1 of 2 »

Welcome , today is Sunday, 02/05/2012