Tags: silver

Utah Legislature Opts for Gold, Silver in Commerce

Editor’s Note: It is about time. I wonder what the banking cartel will have to say about this..

The Utah Legislature on Thursday passed a bill allowing gold and silver coins to be used as legal tender in the state — and for the value of their precious metal, not just the face value of the coins.

State backers said they hope the move will help insulate Utah from a potential monetary slide as countries question the value of the dollar. Others, casting their eye nationwide, said it could spur a broader move by Congress or states to readopt a gold standard.

“Utah, if the governor signs this particularly, they’re going to change the national debate on monetary policy and get us back to basics,” said Jeffrey Bell, policy director for Washington-based American Principles in Action. Mr. Bell has been in Utah to help shepherd the legislation through.

Utah’s bill allows stores to accept gold and silver coins as legal tender. It also exempts gold and silver transactions from the state’s capital gains tax, though that does not shield exchanges from federal taxes.

The legislation directs a state committee to look at whether Utah should recognize an official alternate form of legal tender which could become a path for creating a formal state gold standard.
**FILE** Utah Gov. Gary Herbert (Associated Press)**FILE** Utah Gov. Gary Herbert (Associated Press)

A spokeswoman for Gov. Gary R. Herbert, a Republican, said he has not yet taken a public stance on the bill.

State Rep. Brad J. Galvez, the chief sponsor of the measure, said he views it as a preliminary step on the path toward securing Utah’s business climate.

“If the dollar continues to fall, what this will do will help stabilize the value of the dollar in Utah, so it helps stabilize the economy,” Mr. Galvez, a Republican, said.

While similar legislation has been proposed in nearly a dozen states, Mr. Galvez said that if Mr. Herbert signs his bill, Utah will be just the second state to official recognize the coins as legal tender. Colorado has recognized gold and silver for decades, he said.

Opponents questioned why a state would need to come up with an alternative money system. According to the Deseret News, one lawmaker joked that the state should establish salt as legal tender, since Utah has so much of it.

$4 Gas by Summer?

It won’t be long before we’re paying $4 a gallon for regular unleaded gasoline, at least if prices keep going up at their current pace.

Prices have already surged 38 cents a gallon in metro Detroit since President’s Day and likely will jump again by early next week as crude oil prices shot up nearly $3 Friday to $104.63 a barrel.

While Californians are already paying $4 a gallon for premium, unleaded regular reached an average of $3.53 for metro Detroit on Friday, according to AAA’s Daily Fuel Gauge Report. That reflected a range from $3.29 at a BP outlet at Jefferson Avenue and Masonic in St. Clair Shores to $3.79 at the Metro Airport BP at Middlebelt and Wick Road in Romulus.

“If you see a good price, go for it,” said AAA spokeswoman Nancy Cain. “Until the Middle East crisis settles down, pump prices will follow crude oil prices.”

The average wholesale price for the state was $2.88 a gallon Friday afternoon, according to Mark Griffin, president of the Michigan Petroleum Association. That’s before retailers pay taxes, credit card fees and overhead.

“That equates to a breakeven price of $3.63 a gallon,” Griffin said.

Tom Kloza, chief oil analyst at the Oil Price Information Service, said fear that the Libyan conflict will continue and possibly spread to Saudi Arabia is driving oil prices to the highest point since September 2008.

“Retail prices have another 3 to 5 cents a gallon of catching up to do, then we’ll see what happens Monday,” Kloza said.

U.S. motorists would spend about $44 billion on gasoline this month if pump prices average $3.50 a gallon, or 36% more than the $32.3 billion they spent on gas in February, according to calculations from OPIS.

Inevitably, that means they will cut spending on other goods and services. They also may rethink the type of vehicles they buy, although that should not cripple the auto industry’s fledgling recovery, said Standard & Poor’s credit analyst Robert Schulz.

“Higher oil and gas prices are definitely bad for the auto sector,” Schulz said. “Prices at $4 a gallon will change the mix. As people buy more small cars, every automaker will be less profitable. Fortunately, this time they have a much lower cost base.”

Light trucks – pickups, SUVs, minivans and crossovers – accounted for 53.4% of total industry sales in January, a month before the latest oil price spike. Light trucks were 67% of sales at Ford and 62.6% of sales at General Motors. For Chrysler in February, light trucks represented 81% of sales.

Ford has increased the portion of sales coming from small cars to nearly 11% in January from 6.9% in 2007. Both Ford and GM also have done well in the crossover segment, which generally are lighter weight and more fuel efficient than SUVs.

Ford shares fell 2.3% Friday, to close at $14.42, its lowest price since early November. GM shares slipped to $32.39, the lowest closing price since last November’s initial public offering.

Announced Layoffs Rise 20% from a Year Ago

March 2 (Bloomberg) — Employers in the U.S. announced more job cuts in February than in the same month last year, led by a surge at government agencies.

Planned firings increased 20 percent to 50,702 last month from February 2010, the first year-over-year gain since May 2009, according to a report today from Chicago-based Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc. Announcements at federal, state and local government offices almost tripled from last year.

“More job cuts at the federal level are expected in the months ahead as pressure mounts to cut costs and rein in the soaring national debt,” John A. Challenger, the outplacement company’s chief executive officer, said in a statement.

Dismissals of government workers may contribute to a slowdown in consumer spending, which accounts for 70 percent of the economy. Combined with the highest gasoline prices in two years, the threat of a pause in purchases may already be causing retailers, which had the second-biggest number of announcements last month, to pare payrolls, said Challenger.

“If gasoline tops $4 per gallon in the coming weeks, consumers may be forced to make significant changes to their spending habits,” said Challenger. “At this stage of the recovery, that could be an extremely damaging setback.”

Compared with last month, which saw the fewest firings for any January since record-keeping began in 1993, job-cut announcements climbed 32 percent. Because the figures aren’t adjusted for seasonal effects, economists prefer to focus on year-over-year changes rather than monthly numbers.

Government Firings

Government and non-profit agencies led the February job cuts with 16,380 announced reductions, according to Challenger. Retail firms had 8,360.

Michigan led all states with 6,381 announced job cuts, followed by the District of Columbia, with 5,946.

Today’s report also showed that employers announced plans in February to hire 72,581 workers, up from 29,492 the prior month. The surge reflects Home Depot Inc.’s announcement that it planned to add 60,000 temporary workers, Challenger said.

While touring an Intel Corp. semiconductor manufacturing facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, last month, President Barack Obama said the U.S. must foster a business climate that encourages job creation and assures companies can draw on an educated workforce.

“In a world that is more competitive than ever before, it’s our job to make sure that America is the best place on earth to do business,” Obama said Feb. 18 at the factory.

Hiring Plans

Intel, the world’s largest chipmaker, announced plans during Obama’s visit to build a $5 billion microprocessor plant in Arizona and hire 4,000 employees in the U.S. this year.

Employers hired 193,000 workers in February, and the unemployment rate rose to 9.1 percent, according to the median estimate of economists in a Bloomberg News survey ahead of a March 4 employment report from the Labor Department.

Challenger’s data do not always correlate with figures on payrolls or first-time jobless claims as reported by the government. Many job cuts are carried out through attrition or early retirement. Some employees whose jobs are eliminated find work elsewhere in their companies and many announced staff reductions never take place because business improves. The totals also include foreign affiliates.

Pump Prices Rattle Drivers, Businesses

NEW YORK (AP) — High fuel prices are putting the squeeze on drivers’ wallets just as they are starting to feel better about the economy. They’re also forcing tough choices on small-business owners who are loathe to charge more for fear of losing cost-conscious customers.

Gasoline prices rose 4 percent last week to a national average of $3.29 per gallon. That’s the highest level ever for this time of year, when prices are typically low. And with unrest in the Middle East and North Africa lifting the price of oil to the $100-a-barrel range, analysts say pump prices are likely headed higher.

Bryon Gongaware, an owner of The Floral Trunk and Gifts in White Bear Lake, Minn., didn’t raise his $7 flower delivery charge when gas prices spiked in 2008, and he doesn’t plan to do so this time, either.

“I don’t think the economy is solid enough that you can be careless about raising prices,” he said, standing among the flower clippings on the floor of the shop he has run for 21 years.

That means the extra costs that come from driving the store’s delivery van 70,000 miles a year come from only one place: “right out of the bottom line,” he said.

For drivers such as Robert Wagner, 51, a high school teacher from Thornton, Colo., the higher fuel costs mean cutting back on movies and dinners out for him, his wife and their two children. “We’re very, very frugal right now,” he said as he trickled enough $3.09-per-gallon gasoline into his Chevrolet Suburban to get him to his next pay day.

Analysts and economists worry that by lowering profits for businesses and reducing disposable income for drivers, high gasoline prices could slow the recovering economy.

Over a year, analysts estimate, oil at $100 a barrel would reduce U.S. economic growth by 0.2 or 0.3 of a percentage point. Rather than grow an estimated 3.7 percent this year, the economy would expand 3.4 percent or 3.5 percent. That would likely mean less hiring and higher unemployment.

Americans are less prepared to absorb the spike in gasoline prices than they were the last time prices rose this high, in 2008, because unemployment is higher and real estate values are lower, says David Portalatin, an analyst for the market research firm NPD Group.

It has been four months since gasoline rose beyond $3 per gallon. During that time, drivers have spent $14 billion more on gasoline than they did a year ago, Portalatin says.

Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial in Chicago, says this year’s cut in payroll taxes offers consumers a buffer against higher fuel prices. Still, she expects all but the wealthiest Americans to cut back on discretionary spending. And the longer prices stay high, the more damage they do.

Gasoline prices rose throughout last fall as the developing nations of Asia and the recovering economies of the West began using more oil.

In recent weeks, upheaval in the Middle East and North Africa stoked fears that oil supplies would be disrupted, and oil prices exceeded $100 per barrel for only the second time in history.

Much of the most dramatic unrest took place in countries that are not big producers of oil. But when Libya plunged into chaos, there were disruptions in shipments of its high-quality crude, which is well-suited to making gasoline. That sent refiners scrambling to find other sources of high-quality oil. Gasoline prices rose further.

Gasoline prices typically fall in the winter and rise in the spring as refiners switch to more expensive summer blends of gasoline. Since 2000, prices in May have been 52 cents per gallon on average higher than in February, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Tom Kloza, chief oil analyst at the Oil Price Information Service, believes that the normal seasonal rise in prices has been pulled ahead by events in the Middle East, but he still expects prices to rise further. He predicts prices will reach $3.50 to $3.75 per gallon, barring more chaos in the Middle East.

“When we get over $3.75 we are looking at very serious consequences for the economy,” he says.

For every 25-cent increase in the price of gasoline, the nation spends an extra $3 billion filling up its cars and trucks, Kloza says.

For Jay Ricker, who owns 51 convenience stores in Indiana that sell gasoline under BP and Marathon brands, that’s less money for the “affordable luxuries” he offers — cappuccinos and candy bars that people enjoy, but can do without. “I hate these high prices,” he says. “People don’t want to come in and buy something I make money off.”

Drivers often get angry when gasoline prices spike for reasons that aren’t apparent, such as refinery problems or overseas demand for oil.

This time, though, the dramatic news reports from the Middle East are making customers more understanding, says Scott Hartman, CEO of Rutter’s Farm Stores, which owns 56 convenience stores and gas stations near Harrisburg, York and Lancaster, Pa.

“Whenever you see chaos in the Middle East, people expect higher prices, and this has been more widespread than most of us have seen in our lifetimes,” he says. “It’s quite clear our customers know what’s going on.”

That doesn’t mean they like it.

When asked about fuel prices at a RaceTrac service station in Dallas, Shaun DuFresne tapped the screen on the pump, showing he had just spent $90.14 for diesel — at $3.50 a gallon — to fill his 2006 Ford F-250 pickup truck. Then he said something unprintable.

Just When You Thought It Was Safe (To Buy EuroBonds)

Portugal is under increasing pressure to take a bail-out as its borrowing costs have stayed above a level widely considered unsustainable for longer than Greece and Ireland before their rescues last year.

Portugal’s benchmark market interest rates were above 7 per cent for the 16th consecutive trading day on Friday, closing at 7.55 per cent. Greece and Ireland, the two eurozone countries to seek bail-outs so far, lasted 13 and 15 trading days respectively with bond yields of more than 7 per cent.

“They are going to need some kind of support. You can’t magic this debt away,” said Gary Jenkins, head of fixed income at Evolution Securities.

Few expect Portugal to seek a bail-out before a European Union summit next month to discuss whether any reform of the eurozone’s bail-out mechanisms is necessary.

A growing number of opposition politicians in Portugal have joined international investors and economists in saying a bail-out now seems unavoidable.

“We’re walking a financial tightrope every day,” said Luís Marques Mendes, a former leader of the centre-right Social Democrats (PSD), the main opposition party. “A request for a financial rescue within three or four weeks is inevitable.”

Paulo Rangel, an MEP and senior PSD official, said: “I’m convinced an external intervention will be necessary.”

However, the minority Socialist government is maintaining its defiant stance that Portugal has no need of a bail-out and can continue to finance its debt in the market. Fernando Teixeira dos Santos, finance minister, says the implied interest rate of its debt is only 3.6 per cent on average, compared with a European Union average of about 3.5 per cent. He stresses that Portugal has raised about a third of the €20bn ($27.5bn) it needs this year with demand remaining relatively firm, “despite all the noise”.

Investors are nervously eyeing the fate of Portugal less because of its importance as a market and more for its potential to act as a firebreak to stop the eurozone debt crisis spreading to Spain, one of Europe’s biggest economies and judged next in line. “I don’t really care about Portugal but I do care about Spain,” said one of Europe’s largest bond investors. “Protecting it has to be a key priority.”

Mr Jenkins said Portugal was different from Greece and Ireland in that its refinancing needs in the next two years were relatively modest but he expected some support to be given it from the EU in the coming weeks.

Lisbon has not issued any long-term bonds since yields surged after a €3.5bn syndicated sale on February 7. Analysts do not expect it to schedule any five- or 10-year debt auctions until after the March EU summit.

Lisbon has blamed “delays and hesitations” by eurozone leaders for affecting market sentiment towards its debt.

Portugal has scheduled a sale of short-term Treasury bills on Wednesday together with a second buy-back auction for outstanding government bonds.

Saudis Doing What We Do Best

Editor’s Note: Now that the King is scared, he’s tackling popular dissent the American way – with handouts..

The king, who had been convalescing in Morocco after back surgery in New York in November, stood as he descended from the plane in a special lift. He then took to a wheelchair.

Hundreds of men in white robes performed a traditional Bedouin sword dance on carpets laid out at Riyadh airport for the return of the monarch, thought to be 87.

Abdullah left his ailing octogenarian half-brother, Crown Prince Sultan, in charge during his absence.

Before Abdullah arrived, state media announced an action plan to help lower- and middle-income people among the 18 million Saudi nationals. It includes pay rises to offset inflation, unemployment benefits and affordable family housing.

Saudi Arabia has so far escaped popular protests against poverty, corruption and oppression that have raged across the Arab world, toppling entrenched leaders in Egypt and Tunisia and even spreading to Bahrain, linked to the kingdom by a causeway.

Significantly, Bahrain’s King Hamad bin Isa was among the princes thronging the tarmac when Abdullah flew in.

King Hamad freed about 250 political prisoners on Wednesday and has offered dialogue with protesters, mostly from Bahrain’s Shi’ite majority, who demand more say in the Sunni-ruled island.

Riyadh would be worried if unrest in Bahrain, where seven people were killed and hundreds wounded last week, spread to its own disgruntled Shi’ite minority in the oil-rich east.

“DAY OF RAGE”

Hundreds of people have backed a Facebook call for a Saudi “day of rage” on March 11 to demand an elected ruler, greater freedom for women and the release of political prisoners.

Saudi analysts said the king might soon reshuffle his cabinet to inject fresh blood and revive stalled reforms.

Saudi stability is of global concern. A key U.S. ally, the top OPEC producer holds more than a fifth of world oil reserves.

The king announced no political reforms such as municipal council polls demanded by opposition groups. Saudi Arabia has no elected parliament or parties and allows little public dissent.

Jeddah-based Saudi analyst Turad al-Amri welcomed what he called “a nice gesture” from the king, saying the measures were not unprecedented or prompted by Arab protests elsewhere.

But other Saudis were critical. “We want rights, not gifts,” said Fahad Aldhafeeri in one typical message on Twitter.

“They are under pressure. They have to do something. We know Saudi Arabia is surrounded by revolutions of various types, and not just in poor countries, but in some such as Libya which are rich,” said Mai Yamani, at London’s Chatham House think tank. “Basically what the king is doing is good, but it’s an old message of using oil money to buy the silence, subservience and submission of the people,” she said. “The new generation of revolution is surrounding them from everywhere.”

Mahmoud Sabbagh, 28, said he and 45 other young Saudi activists had sent the king a petition advocating more profound change, not just economic handouts. He listed the group’s demands as “national reform, constitutional reform, national dialogue, elections and female participation.”

Saudi Arabia holds more than $400 billion in net foreign assets, but faces social pressures such as housing shortages and high youth unemployment in a fast-growing population.

“Housing and job creation for Saudis are two structural challenges this country is facing,” said John Sfakianakis, chief economist at Banque Saudi Fransi, who put the total value of the king’s measures at 140 billion riyals ($37 billion).

He said some benefits were one-off and others were already budgeted. “The inflationary impact will not be significant.”

G20 member Saudi Arabia has outlined spending of 580 billion riyals for 2011 in its third consecutive record budget.

Investment bank EFG-Hermes put the king’s benefit package at 100 billion riyals, saying it could rally a stock market that lost 4 percent in the past week on unrest in Bahrain and elsewhere.

Ahmad al-Omran, who runs the popular Saudi Jeans blog, said on Twitter that the measures would benefit many people, but were equivalent to fighting the symptoms and ignoring the disease.

“People don’t revolt because they are hungry. People revolt because they want their dignity, because they want to govern themselves. Money won’t solve our issues. We need true political and social reform. We need freedom, justice and dignity.”

Irish ‘Bailouts’ Really a Loss of Sovereignty

DUBLIN – Ireland’s banks were hit with downgrades Friday — one to junk bond status — as speculation mounted that an EU-IMF bailout of Ireland could require senior bondholders to help cover the massive losses.

Prime Minister Brian Cowen saw his own hold on power slip another notch, as his ruling Fianna Fail party lost a special election for a long-empty seat in parliament. The winner vowed to force Cowen from office before he can pass an emergency 2011 budget being demanded as part of the international rescue.

The New York-based Standard & Poor’s credit ratings agency said it was lowering Anglo Irish Bank six notches to a junk-bond B grade. It also cut the ratings on Bank of Ireland one notch to BBB+, and downgraded both Allied Irish Banks and Irish Life & Permanent one notch to BBB.

The agency said bonds issued by Anglo are particularly at risk of being discounted as part of an euro85 billion ($113 billion) rescue mission by the European Union and the International Monetary Fund. It says Ireland “may be forced to reconsider its current supportive stance toward Anglo’s unguaranteed debt.”

Junior bondholders at Anglo already have been forced to accept losses of 80 percent to 95 percent on their loans.

“People are already joking on Twitter that Anglo’s move is really an upgrade,” said Constantin Gurdgiev, finance lecturer at Trinity College Dublin, reflecting widespread surprise that S&P’s ratings on Irish banks had been so benign until now. “There really is a serious question as to whether Anglo Irish Bank should even have a banking license.”

Gurdgiev said it was inevitable that the emerging EU-IMF bailout would require even senior bondholders to take “a haircut” — lose part of their stake — on the money they could claim back on their loans to Ireland’s debt-crippled banks.

“It’s becoming clearer by the day there is really no other solution,” he said.

In the northwest county of Donegal, an Irish nationalist who has vowed to vote against Ireland’s austerity plans won a seat in parliament, cutting Cowen’s majority to just two seats.

Sinn Fein candidate Pearse Doherty said his dominant performance in a six-candidate field showed that people want to elect a new government that will force foreign banks, not Irish taxpayers, to bear the cost of Ireland’s enormous financial crisis.

Doherty had successfully sued the government over its 17-month refusal to permit an election in Donegal, given Cowen’s unpopularity and narrow hold on power.

Voters “are telling Brian Cowen to get out of office. It’s not clear that this budget will pass. It is completely unfair and unjust to attack the weakest and most vulnerable in this society,” Doherty said. “The government should suspend the budget, call a general election, and let the people have their say.”

Cowen is unveiling an emergency budget Dec. 7 that seeks to cut euro6 billion ($8 billion) from Ireland’s 2011 deficit. He and European officials say that budget must be passed to clear the way for the EU-IMF bailout loan for Ireland.

Ireland’s 2010 deficit is running at 32 percent of GDP, the highest in Europe since World War II. The country’s severe financial problems are rooted in its enormous bailout of Irish banks who gorged themselves on overpriced real estate.

My Two Cents – The Great Currency Wars

On 9/18/2009 I wrote an editorial called ‘The Quiet Grab’. It discussed China’s deal cutting on the natural resources front, specifically in the rare earth element and petroleum sectors. The article pointed out that the Chinese were quietly provisioning ready supplies of strategic assets for the turmoil that lay ahead, particularly arising from a disdain and mistrust of paper instruments, especially currencies. With the USFed’s second iteration of quantitative easing now underway, the currency battles are starting to heat up and so is the rhetoric. This week we take a look at the ongoing (and intensifying) currency wars, strategic assets, and why we are behind the proverbial eight ball.

The Return of 1930’s Style Protectionism?

This morning, the head of the World Trade Organization (WTO), General Pascal Lamy, weighed in with that group’s position on currency wars.

Generating employment “is at the heart of the strategy of some countries to keep their currencies undervalued,” Lamy said in New Delhi. “Just as it is also at the heart of other countries’ loose monetary policies.”
Competitive devaluations, which have raised fears of a global currency war, could trigger “tit-for-tat protectionism”, he told a business audience.

What Lamy and most economists and policymakers neither want to acknowledge nor deal with is that their great paradigm of ‘borrow and spend to prosperity’ is broken. His argument that countries like China want to keep currencies cheap to export is absolutely true. His position that the USFed’s decision to try to keep the Dollar cheap is borne out of a desire to ‘stimulate’ the economy is also spot on. Where he misses the boat are on the causes for the current predicament, the very existence of his employer being front and center as a major contributor.

China is the World’s Biggest Wal-Mart

Not only do the Chinese provide the vast majority of the consumer goods on Wal-Mart’s shelves, they’ve stolen a page or two from the mega-retailer’s playbook. Or perhaps Wal-Mart swiped China’s modus operandi, but it really doesn’t matter. China has for years now been flooding the developed world with cheap goods and, with the cooperation of first world politicians, has been driving manufacturing jobs to the Third World. This has been done much in the same way Wal-Mart has destroyed thousands of Mom and Pop stores throughout the nation. They go into an area, undercut local businesses on price, put them out of business and then establish monopoly power. They don’t even need to raise prices once the competition is destroyed. Economies of scale produce sizable profits all on their own.

China is doing much the same thing. This is one of the reasons they have been ready and willing to buy our Treasuries for so long. It provided them with the ability to undergo their very own industrial revolution and establish a bridgehead as the world’s manufacturing power. In the process, how many American industries have fallen by the wayside? Too many to count. And we’re not their only trading partner either. Less than 25% of China’s exports actually made it to North America in 2007. That is a staggering revelation for most people, as we tend to believe that the Chinese somehow ‘need’ us to consume their products.

The Destination of China's Exports

But China has her own problems. Their cheap currency, while enabling significant export gains, has also touched off a wave of domestic inflation, which is being manifested right now in politically sensitive soaring food prices. Americans should take note here.

America’s Ridiculous Demand

Perhaps the most ironic occurrence in the early stages of the currency war is the exhortations by American politicians and central bankers. They are demanding that China allow its currency to appreciate, which would in effect make it easier for American companies to export to China. We do export a significant amount of heavy equipment to China, as does Germany. After all, someone needs to provide the Chinese manufacturing machine with capital equipment.

But there is much more to this than meets the eye and that is where we all need to be paying attention. Think about what Bernanke, and many members of Congress are asking for. When they demand that China allow their currency to appreciate, they are in effect demanding that the Dollar be depreciated. They are saying essentially “Yes Mr. Jiabao; we want the Dollar to be worth less so Mr. and Mrs. America will have to pay more for your imported goods when they go to the store”. This flies totally in the face of the robotic ‘A strong dollar is in the national interest’ phrase uttered by Hank Paulson in what seems to be an eternity ago now.

USD/CNY Pair - Yuan stagnation

In this reality lies the essence of our current problem. We have a choice. Our government is taking a stance that we can create jobs by depreciating the Dollar and somehow that is going to overcome the massive increase in costs of imports. This might work if we weren’t such an import-driven society, but that is certainly not the case. And it isn’t just the Chinese we import from either. Think crude oil and refined gasoline products. At current import rates and oil prices, we import almost $900 Million per day just in petroleum. That is around $27 Billion per month. We’ve seen what the devaluation of the Dollar has done to the jobs picture in just the past five years. Does any person with two brain cells to rub together really expect this nonsense to work?

Strategic Assets Trump Cash?

We are reaching the point where I believe the quiet grab by the Chinese over the past decade in terms of strategic assets is about to pay off. Anyone who runs a manufacturing operation knows that stable input prices and supplies are a key component of that business’ long-term success. Obviously any manufacturing operation built using the petroleum paradigm is going to use plenty of black gold. The same goes for a world that is hooked on handheld gadgets and green technology. Most hybrid owners don’t realize the amount of exploration, provisioning, and drilling/mining that goes into finding the materials necessary to make the high tech components of their vehicles. The same goes for the owners of the vast majority of consumer electronics. We just don’t think about it. The Chinese have. By virtue of their location, they have roughly 95% of the world’s rare earth elements at their disposal. They’ve locked down supplies of crude oil to fuel their manufacturing empire, at least in the short to medium term. Who really thinks the United States is going to win a trade war, a currency war, or any type of economic war with the Chinese at this point?

Given these realities, and how all of these circumstances are woven together, we can already be pretty sure of how the great currency wars will turn out. Those with the advantages will use them and those at a disadvantage with posture, pander, and talk. But in the end, talk is cheap.

Survey Economists Bet on $500 Billion of QE

The Federal Reserve will probably introduce an unprecedented second round of unconventional monetary easing tomorrow by announcing a plan to buy at least $500 billion of long-term securities, according to economists surveyed by Bloomberg News.

Policy makers meeting today and tomorrow will restart a program of securities purchases to spur growth, reduce unemployment and increase inflation, said 53 of 56 economists surveyed last week. Twenty-nine estimated the Fed will pledge to buy $500 billion or more, while another seven predicted $50 billion to $100 billion in monthly purchases without a specified total. The remainder said the Fed would buy up to $500 billion or didn’t quantify their forecast.

The varied responses reflect differences among Fed officials over the total amount of purchases needed to bolster the recovery. Policy makers, pursuing unprecedented stimulus, have cut the benchmark rate almost to zero and bought $1.7 trillion in securities without generating growth fast enough to bring down unemployment from near a 26-year high.

“There’s no silver bullet right now” and central bankers have “very few options left in terms of lowering interest rates,” said John Silvia, chief economist at Wells Fargo Securities LLC in Charlotte, North Carolina. He predicted $500 billion of Treasury and mortgage-backed securities purchases in the next six months.

Shock-and-Awe Plan

Disagreements among policy makers over whether to expand the balance sheet incrementally or stage a so-called shock-and- awe program of big asset purchases have created confusion among investors over the likely size and duration of any new easing, said Ward McCarthy, chief financial economist at Jefferies & Co. in New York.

“There has not been a uniformity of opinion emanating from the multitude of public appearances from Fed officials,” McCarthy said. He predicts the Fed will buy $500 billion of securities over the next six months and was among 13 economists who said the purchases would include mortgage-backed bonds in addition to Treasuries.

New York Fed President William Dudley set expectations at $500 billion in purchases when he said in an Oct. 1 speech that purchases totaling about that amount would add as much stimulus as lowering the Fed’s benchmark rate by 0.5 percentage point to 0.75 percentage point.

Dudley put the $500 billion figure “in there and it sounded like he was trying to move it along in that direction,” said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at Bank of Tokyo- Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. in New York, who predicts the Fed will announce up to $500 billion of purchases by March.

Many Variables

Referring to investor expectations of the central bank’s next move, Rupkey said, “It’s a mess, and it’s just because there’s too many variables between the amount and the time period.”

St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said on Oct. 21 the Fed should buy $100 billion in long-term Treasuries this month and calibrate subsequent purchases based on the course of the economy. Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart said that a pace of $100 billion of purchases a month is “in the range of numbers one might consider.”

Estimates by economists about the duration of a Fed asset purchase program ranged from as short as three months to as long as the end of 2011. Three analysts said the Federal Open Market Committee wouldn’t announce new stimulus.

Favorable Reaction

“It’s highly unlikely that anyone’s going to get all the details right because going into the meeting Fed officials themselves won’t have agreed on all of” them, Jefferies’ McCarthy said. He said he expects the Fed to buy mortgage-backed securities because it would be a positive surprise, and the central bank wants a “favorable market reaction.”

The lack of clarity over the Fed’s plans has played out in the Treasury market, which handed investors a loss of 0.18 percent in October, the first negative monthly return since March, according to index data compiled by Bank of America Merrill Lynch. After falling to 2.38 percent on Oct. 7 from 2.51 percent on Sept. 30, the yield on 10-year Treasuries has since climbed to 2.63 percent as of late yesterday, Bloomberg data show.

Not all Fed officials agree the central bank should start new stimulus measures. Kansas City’s Thomas Hoenig, who has already dissented six straight times, said on Oct. 25 that he opposes more easing because it’s “a very dangerous gamble” that may accelerate inflation and create asset-price bubbles. Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher and the Philadelphia Fed’s Charles Plosser have also spoken out since the FOMC’s last meeting against more action by the central bank.

Asset Bubbles

“When money is too easy for too long, we will have more” asset bubbles, former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker, an adviser to President Barack Obama, said today in Singapore.

Chicago Fed President Charles Evans said several times last month that the central bank needs to take action and should buy securities on a large scale to carry out his preferred strategy of aiming to raise inflation temporarily.

“They’re in uncharted waters here, and no one really knows, we’re all guessing” about the size and duration of the easing program and its ultimate impact, said Stephen Stanley, chief economist at Pierpont Securities LLC in Stamford, Connecticut. “I haven’t seen anybody out there who has made a convincing case that this is anything but a trivial boost for the economy.”

Expectations

The central bank last month asked bond dealers and investors for projections of its asset purchases over the next six months, along with the likely effect on yields. The New York Fed, the branch of the Fed System that implements monetary policy, asked about expectations for the size of the program and the time over which it would be completed, according to a survey obtained by Bloomberg News.

Stanley predicted the Fed will opt for the incremental tactic and announce a program to buy $200 billion of Treasuries by its Jan. 26 meeting.

“They want to preserve flexibility and to have the option of tweaking the pace as they go based on whatever it is that they choose to look at,” Stanley said.

“Clearly the thrust of this is to get long-term rates lower, but when you listen to what they say about it, they don’t even plan to get a lot of juice out of what they want to do,” he said. “What does that do for the economy?”

Dudley, who is also vice chairman of the FOMC, said in the Oct. 1 speech that the central bank would probably need to act to address “unacceptable” job growth and inflation.

Inflation Eases

The U.S. economy expanded at a 2 percent annual rate in the third quarter and inflation cooled, Commerce Department figures showed Oct. 29 in Washington. The report showed the inflation gauge watched by the Fed rose the least in almost two years as retailers like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Target Corp. use discounts to lure shoppers.

In addition to a new round of asset purchases, policy makers are also considering efforts to boost public expectations that inflation will rise, according to the minutes of the FOMC’s Sept. 21 meeting.

All but two economists predict the Fed will leave the interest rate on excess reserves unchanged at 0.25 percent. Fifteen analysts, including McCarthy, say the Fed will alter the phrase that its benchmark interest rate will stay near zero for an “extended period,” which was introduced in March 2009.

“They’ve been telling us they’ve been considering a change to the ‘extended period,’ so at some point they’re going to do it and this is as good a time as any,” McCarthy said.

The questions were as follows:

1a. At the FOMC’s Nov. 2-3 meeting, will the committee decide to (choose one):

a) Retain the current policy of keeping a constant level of the Fed’s securities holdings by reinvesting principal payments from agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in longer-term Treasury securities

b) Increase the level of securities holdings through additional asset purchases

Result (56 replies): A, 3; B, 53.

1b. If you answered (b) to the last question, please provide your predictions on the following possible elements of the announcement:

a. The amount of additional purchases announced in billions

of dollars:

b. The length of time for the additional purchases to be

completed:

c. The types of securities to be purchased:

1) Treasuries

2) mortgage-backed securities

3) both Treasuries and MBS

4) other (please elaborate)

Result (53 replies): a) 29 expect $500 billion or more; 7 predicted monthly purchases of $50 billion to $100 billion without specifying a total; 12 predicted up to $500 billion; 5 didn’t specify an amount.

b) 7 predicted monthly purchases with no timeline; 9 predicted up to three months; 17 said between three and six months; 9 said between six months and one year; 5 said through 2011; 6 didn’t specify a pace or timeline.

c) 38 said Treasuries (including Treasury-Inflation Protected Securities); 13 said both Treasuries and MBS (including one that also predicted agency bond purchases); 2 didn’t specify.

2. Will the FOMC statement following the Nov. 2-3 meeting include any changes to the following sentence: “The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.” Yes or no.

Results (49 replies): Yes, 15; No, 34.

3. Will the Fed decide at the Nov. 2-3 meeting to reduce the 0.25 percent interest rate on excess reserves? Yes or no.

Results (47 replies): Yes, 2; No, 45.

JP Morgan/HSBC Sued over Silver Manipulation

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Two separate lawsuits filed in federal court in Manhattan Wednesday allege that banks J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) and HSBC Holdings Inc. (NYSE:HBC) manipulate the price of silver futures by “amassing enormous short positions.”

The suits allege that by managing giant positions in silver futures and options, the banks have influenced the prices of silver on the New York Stock Exchanges’ Comex Exchange since early 2008.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has been in the midst of a high-profile, two-year-old investigation of the silver market.

J.P. Morgan declined to comment on the lawsuits. HSBC wasn’t immediately available to comment.

A suit filed by Peter Laskaris, who traded COMEX silver futures and options contracts, says the banks colluded on the silver market and informed each other of large trades. It says the banks used their large positions to effect the market by “flooding” it with a disproportionate number of orders.

The suit says J.P. Morgan and HSBC in August 2008 together held 85% of the net short position in silver and by the first quarter 2009 held $7.9 billion in precious metal derivatives.

According to the other lawsuit filed by Brian Beatty, who also traded silver contracts, says he was hurt by J.P. Morgan’s alleged anticompetitive acts and market manipulation. Specifically, the suit said Beatty, a Connecticut resident, bought and sold silver contracts on Aug. 14 and Aug. 15, 2008, when the price of silver suffered an 18% drop from $14.86 to $12.23.

Laskaris, a New York resident, also was hurt by the alleged “artificial market in COMEX silver futures” from June 2008 to June 2009, according to the lawsuit.

The suit by Laskaris further alleges that when the public began complaining about the banks’ high positions and the government began an investigation in March silver prices, silver went from underperforming to outperforming the price of gold.

The silver market, no stranger to controversy, has long been the focus of manipulation theorists. At a CFTC hearing Tuesday to consider new rules to strengthen its commodity-enforcement powers, commissioner Bart Chilton said market players have made “repeated” and “fraudulent efforts to persuade and deviously control” silver prices.

J.P. Morgan and HSBC traditionally have been big players in the silver market. A CFTC weekly report for Oct. 19, the most recent period, shows that less than four market players hold 24.3% of all net bearish bets in the silver market. J.P. Morgan and HSBC are among those market participants, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing silver traders and a person close to the investigation.

In recent months, however, the banks with large futures positions have sharply reduced the size of their holdings.

The lawsuits request the banks’ “unjust” enrichments from the collusion and manipulation.

(Updates with more information from suits, HSBC declines to comment, comments from a strategist.)

« page 2 of 5 »

Welcome , today is Sunday, 02/05/2012