Tags: money

A Permanent Crisis – By Andy Sutton

As the financial world breathed a collective sigh of relief as the Greek Parliament voted to impose further austerity measures on the people of Greece, I wondered aloud to no one in particular how many times we’d have to see this movie before people finally realize that this crisis is a permanent one. There are many analogies that we could use to illustrate what has gone on, but probably the best is a trauma patient coming into the hospital with a severed carotid artery. Instead of performing surgery and repairing the wound, doctors throw the unlucky fellow on a gurney with a piece of gauze taped over the incision. Every so often they check back in, throw another piece of gauze on it and walk out, never fixing the problem. That is precisely what is going on with regards to the Eurozone mess. And America’s too. Lots of tape and gauze with precious little in the way of real solutions has been the norm for quite some time now and there is no reason to think that this will change unless it is out of dire necessity.

In my opinion, there are (at least) three overriding macro themes that are driving this crisis, and will continue to do so. Like most other recent economic and financial dislocations, it will go until it doesn’t. Looking at the macro drivers below, it is easy to see why this is the case: old habits die hard and most importantly, this crisis, along with most others, is insanely profitable for a select few.

The Psycho-Moral Problem

When you really tear away at all the media glitz and veneer applied to the global debt mess, you can find several underlying causes. The first is greed. The second, and this one has been a rather recent development, is laziness. I often wonder if America would be able to undergo another industrial revolution similar to the first one in today’s world. I seriously doubt it. We seem to be good at building shopping malls and restaurants, then borrowing money to patronize these establishments. In the aggregate though, we really haven’t built much in the way of productive capacity in a generation, let alone manned and operated it. Do we even remember how? What is really coming to the forefront is that we are by no means alone in this suspiciously insane endeavor; the people of Europe have been doing a mighty fine job of living beyond their means as well. Europe has had its own ‘great society’ upheaval similar to America’s turn down the wrong path in the 1960′s.

This drive to create a social utopia, or in economic terms, a post-scarcity world, has created exactly that which it was supposed to avoid – long-term scarcity. Why did these attempts occur? Gross misunderstandings of economics? Many think so, but when you read the articles, papers, and other correspondence written by many of the players in these movements it becomes rather clear that they were interested more in power accumulation than anything else. And two continents got wrapped up into it to the point where we have no idea how to live without it. Here in the US, over half of the population receives some type of transfer payment from the government. For the purposes of this article, I am not making the distinction between people who paid into programs like social security and Medicare and those who didn’t. The point is governments have become little more than a very expensive conduit between the ‘working’ class and those who are collecting from them. And, it has been this way so long that people cannot fathom a world that is any different. When they are confronted with drastic change, well, you saw what happened in Athens – and is still going on despite the fact that the media has moved on to more pressing and important matters such as Nancy Grace’s newfound popularity.

The bottom line is that the Eurozone and America both need a massive attitude adjustment. 2008 didn’t even put a dent in the entitlement mentality in either locale. Imagine what it will take to change our way of thinking.

Rating Agency Competitive Downgrades

The final two bullet points likely fall under the broad category of financial and economic cannibalism. For years now, I’ve marveled both publicly and privately about the willingness of the major credit rating agencies to maintain the sterling debt rating of the USGovt despite a growing fiscal morass that is now only first being truly recognized. Let’s make the assumption that the people who run these agencies are not illiterate and actually know what is going on. Unfortunately, this logic has proven to be spot on as is evidenced by the constant beatings applied to Eurozone countries by the majors (S&P / Moody’s).

2010 Sovereign Ratings

This strategy of competitive downgrades serves to exacerbate the debt issue at its core, pretty much guaranteeing that none of these countries will ever clear their debts. Of course that is the whole point. The current action dovetails rather well with John Perkins’ assertions in “Confessions of an Economic Hitman.” Keep in mind also that while all these downgrades on PIIGS sovereign debt have taken place, the USGovt has received only ‘stern’ warnings regarding its own fiscal black hole. Clearly Moody’s and S&P are in the business of protecting the status quo. We saw the depths of rating agency fraud beginning in the early part of 2008 when highly rated mortgage tranches suddenly came up lame. We will see this again, this time in USGovt Treasury bonds. The status quo will be protected, even if a company or two takes a dive in the process. Think Lehman Brothers.

2011 Sovereign Ratings

Outrage from the Eurozone has intensified, particularly with yesterday’s severe downgrading of Portugal’s debt by Moody’s. The cut came as a newly elected government had just pushed through an ambitious austerity program. In the past year, Portugal has been cut from Aa2 (two steps below the rating of the USGovt) to Ba2, which is below investment grade and otherwise known as ‘junk’. This has all transpired despite the fact that Portugal has at least been trying to get its house in order. Meanwhile, Washington does zilch and maintains a top rating? These strategic hits on countries that are totally at the whim of the IMF and/or regional central banks reek of foul play. Calls for ‘more responsible behavior’ by Eurozone officials should be replaced with investigations into the ratings agencies themselves, given their duplicitous actions (and lack of action in some cases) regarding credit ratings.

It is also probably a reasonable assumption that both major ratings agencies and the raft of second-tier firms knew going in what was going to happen regarding the Eurozone. Much of the fallout follows the tenets of common sense. The endless bailouts are no different than our own broken system. Whether or not these bailouts are covered by the media is of no consequence. They’ve been going on for years and will continue to go on. The point is, shouldn’t the ratings have gone down sooner? There will be those that will argue that cutting ratings in 2008 or sooner would have precipitated the crisis in and of itself. This is probably precisely why the balloon hasn’t gone up yet on America’s bond ratings. However, it would appear that the ratings have been cut strategically to allow financial entities to game the system, hence my earlier comments regarding financial and economic cannibalism.

Foreign bank exposure to Eurozone debt

Similar to the yield curve, there is a ratings curve in the Eurozone, which creates a multitude of opportunities for trading profits. This goes back to the cardinal rule of large firm investing a la Jim Cramer: when there is no volatility, create some. And if you put a few countries into IMF receivership along the way, well that is just a cost of doing business, right?

Hedge Fund Bets

This probably qualifies as a corollary to my earlier point about parties gaming the system, but I think we need to expound on this just a little bit. My entire point here is that once again, the biggies are playing with fire. And they will get burned. Not maybe. Obviously there are no guarantees in life, but I’d say this one ranks up there with the sun coming up. It is going to happen. This is a continuing testimony to the greed involved in our society and financial system and precisely why I lobbied hard and spoke out against any bailouts in 2008. These people needed to go bankrupt. Instead they were allowed to compromise the financial system and with it, the economy. With the wounds barely healed, if they’ve healed at all, these same folks are right back at it again.

True to form, George Soros has had plenty to say about the Eurozone mess. Remember, he is the same fellow that said ‘I’m having a good crisis’ in 2009 while people were losing homes, jobs, and retirement savings. He added that it was the culmination of his life’s work. Oddly enough, the Daily Mail, which originally posted the story, has since pulled the offensive comments. He said recently,

“We are on the verge of an economic collapse which starts, let’s say, in Greece, but it could easily spread,” billionaire investor George Soros said during a panel discussion in Vienna on June 26. “The financial system remains extremely vulnerable.”

The fact that the self-appointed master of the currency raid has pointed out the fragility of the financial system foreshadows directly to the near certainty that there will in fact be another crisis. Again to my earlier point, it is insanely profitable for a select few. Hedge funds are firmly betting on the extension of the Greek tragedy to the rest of the Eurozone, and some are even betting on the metastasis of the problem across the Atlantic as well.

The major point to understand here is that there is no way to even quantify the risks associated with getting in on the sovereign debt mess. If you had 192 or so standalone countries, each with its own central bank like we used to have, it would be difficult enough just because of the propensity of banks and other financial actors to invest across borders. The idea of the regional currency and central bank was to curtail the risk inherent to the system, but instead, it has done the exact opposite because now there are so many actors gaming the system simultaneously. The idea of having a bunch of Dick Fulds operating on the razor’s edge with the global financial system on the line is a scary proposition. Sooner or later, someone is going to make a mistake and that is going to be it.

Once again, it will come down to the derivatives taking the paper empire to the woodshed. It isn’t even so much the millstone of the hundreds of billions in Eurozone debt that is spread all over the globe. There are bets on that debt, default swaps, options, and a full array of side bets on the debt itself, then bets on the side bets themselves and so on out to the 4th or 5th degree in many cases. The derivative issue was never even really addressed. It was the 800-pound elephant in 2008 and it is still standing there. Why? Because it is insanely profitable for a select few. Which comes back to my original point: we have a true moral crisis at the root of our economic and financial woes. None of the symptoms can be fixed until we get at the real causes and human nature is a tough nut to crack. See why I’m such a pessimist?

We have released a new complimentary report entitled “If You Have Paper Assets.. There are Three Things you MUST Consider”. It is a 10-page report that identifies some logical approaches you can take with regards to your paper investments if you’re one of the many people that still needs them to generate cash flow and income. Bear in mind this is in no way meant to supplant our firm position that each investor needs to have a sizable portion of their portfolio in physical precious metals, however, but is meant to augment the non-metals portion of your overall strategy. The report is available by clicking here.

12 Straight Weeks Above 400K

Editor’s Note: Bernanke may appear confused now, but he told us in 2009 not to expect many jobs in his great ‘recovery’. Click here to read my post about this at the time Ben told us exactly what would happen.

The number of Americans filing claims for unemployment benefits barely fell last week, a government report showed on Thursday, suggesting the labor market was struggling to regain momentum.

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits slipped just 1,000 to a seasonally adjusted 428,000, the Labor Department said. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims dropping to 420,000. The prior week’s figure was unrevised at 429,000.

It was the 12th straight week that claims have been above 400,000, a level that is usually associated with a stable labor market. Employment stumbled badly in May, with employers adding just 54,000 jobs—the fewest in eight months.

“Payroll growth is going to be more like last month’s rather than first three months of the year,” said Troy Davig, senior U.S. economist at Barclays Capital in New York.

Nonfarm payrolls are expected to have increased 90,000 this month, according to a Reuters survey, with the unemployment rate edging down to 9.0 percent. The employment report for June will be released on July 8.

A Labor Department official said one state was estimated, noting there was nothing unusual in the state-level details.

The continued elevation of claims could raise concerns that the economic soft patch in the first half of the year could linger. The economy has been slammed by bad weather, high gasoline prices and supply chain disruptions after the March earthquake in Japan.

However, many economists and the Federal Reserve believe activity will pick-up in the third quarter as these temporary factors ease.

The four-week moving average of unemployment claims, a better measure of underlying trends, nudged up 500 to 426,750.

The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid fell 12,000 to 3.70 million in the week ended June 18. So-called continuing claims covered the survey week for the employment report’s household survey, from which the unemployment rate is derived.

The number of people on emergency unemployment benefits climbed 1,471 to 3.30 million in the week ended June 11, the latest week for which data is available. A total of 7.51 million people were claiming unemployment benefits during that period under all programs, down 30,701 from the prior week.

The War Over Money – My Two Cents

Once again, S&P is at it, issuing its monthly threat to the USGovt to fall into compliance or risk its AAA credit rating. On the surface, these warnings have become rather laughable in that the ratings agency feels the need to say something while, in effect, saying nothing. As time has gone by, the idea that the markets would be jittered by an actual ratings cut has become equally absurd. To hear it reported, you’d think the market consisted of a bunch of first graders who need S&P, Moody’s or Fitch to tell them the sky is blue.

To the average American, the threat comes not from what the ratings agencies might do, but what is being done (or not done) to cause the entire flap to begin with. The only real difference between the US and the PIIGS or anyone else is that we have a standing contract with the moneychangers to provide as much liquidity as is necessary to achieve whatever goals are desirable; not to America, but to the moneychangers themselves. It is a subtle distinction, but one that I notice way too many people who understand things are tripping over. We can’t talk about debt without talking about the Fed and we can’t have a reasonable discussion about the Fed without examining its motives. We have to mention that your local bank gets paid a 6% per annum dividend from the fed for its mandatory participation in the system, among many other things you won’t hear on television.

Obviously one of the ways dollar holders the world over have sought to fight back is through the ownership of precious metals. They are the anathema of fiat currencies. They cannot be forged, printed, or created as computer digits in their physical form. This is nothing new; there has been a secular bull market in metals for over a decade now while the dollar has faded from a desired asset into a ‘necessary evil’ as the world speeds headlong into the clutches of regional and perhaps even global currency regimes.

The moneychangers tolerated the bull market in precious metals for a time as even they recognize the value of real money. Central banks went from being net sellers of gold to net buyers several years ago and have been accumulating. The story of Asian demand, largely unspoken of in the USFinPress has been quietly driving the markets even higher. For US investors, precious metals became a bright spot considering the equity markets have lost around 20% when adjusted for the government’s overly modest inflation figures in the past 10 years. The inflation cat escaped the bag in 2006 and 2007. The Fed then cemented the truth that inflation is a monetary event by its quantitative easing actions. The subsequent rises in virtually every tangible asset since have created a clear causal relationship between monetary action and price formation that even the most stalwart of Keynesians will have an impossible task refuting. Finally, US investors had something that they could rely on to provide protection against inflation. They’d lost the ability to do so with traditional bank CDs, money market funds, and sweep programs. It is only fitting that the moneychangers now try to change the rules they themselves established. And it is even more fitting that they waited until so late in the game to do so. The attacks are subtle to the point that the average metals investor might not understand the implications, but there is a war going on over money itself.

The Attack on Precious Metals

The first of these two attacks has had a profound effect on metals investors, and at the same time created a massive opportunity through the resultant market dislocation. The attack plan all along by the banking cartel has been to discredit gold and silver as monetary instruments while at the same time accumulating large amounts of both. This rush to tangibles has left warehouses with increasingly smaller amounts of metal to work with, particularly silver (see graphic). Wonder of all wonders, people were stepping up to the plate, motivated by people like Jim Sinclair among others, and taking delivery of metals instead of playing in the paper metals markets. People have begun to understand how the ETFs and many other ‘paper gold’ instruments are merely tools of metals manipulators.

COMEX inventory

When silver closed within a whisker of $50 an ounce back in early May, CME took to action by hiking the margin maintenance requirements on silver contracts. Without going into the sordid details, in essence it made it more expensive to hold silver contracts in that the contract holder had to put up more capital. The stated reason behind this action was to limit ‘speculation’ in that particular market. The action followed the traditional mantra of the manipulators – anytime metals prices increase it is because of speculation and when they fall it is because of fundamentals. This is a losing battle that has cost the megabanks untold sums of fiat cash to fight, but the supply of currency is unlimited. CME has hiked margin requirements 6 times between late March and early May, beating silver down from the high $40s to the mid $30s. Gold has been affected as well, albeit to a much lesser extent on a percentage basis. The more recent of these hikes have been on gold contracts as well as silver.

CME Silver Margin Hikes

The second attack has come out recently in emails to customers of some online futures brokers who are interpreting the new financial ‘reform’ bill to inhibit the OTC sale of gold and silver on a leveraged basis. Without delving into the legalese, it will become essentially impossible, starting July 15, to buy or sell spot gold or silver in almost all cases. Many have asked if this is going to affect coin and physical sales, and there has been no indication that this is the case at all; it pertains to leveraged or margined transactions only. So far.

Again, the stated purpose of these actions in the aggregate is to curb ‘speculators’. Obviously we could split hairs on the semantics of such a statement since pretty much anyone who makes any type of investment is a speculator in that they are making an allocation in the hope (not guarantee) that they will profit from it. Oddly enough, in all this talk of speculators nobody bothered to mention the major banks that are routinely short millions of ounces of silver in the paper markets. Apparently they are not speculators, nor are they engaged in rather poorly disguised attempts at market manipulation. Those types of activities would quickly be sniffed out and stomped by Congress and our ever-vigilant regulators. Wouldn’t they?

It is pretty clear what is going on here. The cartel is losing its metal (and its mettle) and is attempting to flush out those contract holders who are most likely to take delivery – the marginal investors who buy futures contracts then remove the metal from the exchanges. Also obvious is the hope is that the increased margin reqs will drive them out. It will not bother the JPMorgans or the HSBCs in the least. If nothing else, these actions reek of desperation and are indicative of the fact that the physical, buy-and-hold crowd is substantial, is here to stay, and is in fact winning the war. Keep it up folks, congratulations on a job well done.

June’s Centsible Investor is Available

June’s edition of CI is available. Click Here to get your subscription started.

The deepening equity purge, coupled with continued weakness in silver cost the model portfolio about 3% this past month. While we’re not at all happy with 3%, the paper equity markets are down now around 6% during the same period, so that is encouraging. Our two newest components in the dividend slice, ironically, are both showing modest gains since we added them at the end of April and are providing some much-needed diversification.

This month’s keynote is called ‘Crash Signature’ and takes a look at what a US default will look like on Main Street. We cover the idea of the outright default as well as the slower, inflationary type in situ default where the Fed assists the USGovt in hyperinflating away its debts. Our major creditors are already onto this game. There is actionable information in this article as it gives you some easy steps that will help mitigate the effects of either scenario.

Energy continues to be a hot area. OPEC is now publicly admitting the likelihood of a shortage of crude oil this fall. Saudi Arabia has promised (once again) to pump all that is needed. We doubt they can. We are not alone. Resource constraints are the order of the day moving forward. Better get used to it. Oddly, the same types of changes in living style that will help you deal with a default are the same types of measures that will help you lessen the blow of peak oil.

In our metals report, we analyze CME’s latest salvo against the precious metals markets. They are losing their metal and the battle to keep prices contained. These margin requirement hikes are one of the last weapons left in their arsenal and the fact they are using it means we’re that much closer to the end of the precious metals cartel. We are still offering gratis consults to any of our year or longer subscribers on precious metals. With all the dislocations in the markets right now and what is likely to get even worse moving forward, why not take advantage? It is a free service for any subscriber who has been with us at least a year or is currently paid up for a subscription of a year or more. If you know someone who might benefit from this valuable service, please pass our information along to them – it is how we grow.

A New Mission

A sabbatical is usually a good thing as it gives a nice opportunity to take a step back, assess, reassess, and potentially relax. I’ve enjoyed the past few months away as I took time to do the above and also to try to impart a little common sense and perhaps some wisdom on the up and coming generation regarding economics, the study thereof, and more importantly, the dire consequences of failing to recognize and follow basic economic laws.  So I return, and in many ways, things are not much different than when I took leave back in February. There have been some recurring themes, and in a sad way, it is nice to have been right about so many things, particularly the fraudulent nature of the recovery that was pronounced by the govermedia back in early 2009. Believe me though, for all the people who have had their jobs outsourced, offshored, or eliminated, I’d have much rather been wrong. The same goes for those who are now struggling to support families on a fraction of their prior earnings. I would much rather have had to slink away in disgrace because of a voracious (and healthy) economic recovery than see the suffering endured by so many.

I remember vividly a conversation I had with author Jim Kunstler a few years ago about these matters and we hammered on the need for people to scale down. Sure, we were having that conversation through the lens of the reality of peak oil, but it really applied in the financial sense as well. Perhaps the reality that has struck me the most over the past few weeks is the impact that McDonalds is able to have on the labor market. Who would have ever thought that a fast-food joint would be responsible for half the jobs created in a single month? And that is if you have any reason at all to believe the BLS jobs numbers. I don’t. But that is another story that has been told many times before and we’ll not do it again.

Getting back to my conversation with Kunstler, we talked about the mental paradigm shift necessary to deal with peak oil. The days of the hour-long commute are limited. Driving more than 100 miles a day is going to be a thing of the past soon. Many are now telecommuting a couple of days a week in jobs where that is suitable and that helps. Gas prices were much lower when Jim and I talked than they are now, that is for sure. For the guy who drives 100 miles each day to work, his commuting bill has gone up dramatically while his wages have stagnated. He is pummeled again at the grocery store with increasing prices for quality and quantity of foods that are continuously decreasing. The media and government are doing Joe America a huge disservice by making it sound like these situations are transient in nature, rather than here for the long term. Again, the point of this commentary is not to flesh out the reasons behind what is going on; that’s already been done. The point is that people need to adjust and most simply won’t. It isn’t that they can’t; they just refuse.

Our entitlement society is heading for a brick wall. The major underpinnings of our gimme society are insolvent. Our debt is skyrocketing. Our bonds are junk. Our currency is a joke. Our ‘free’ press is in the pockets of the same people who have brought all of this economic despair to Main Street. Joe America nearly shut down this corrupt system in 2008-09 simply by curtailing his expansion of borrowing. Nobody wants to talk about that. The proof is irrefutable and the connections are clear. America stops borrowing and the fiat system is dead on arrival at the Fed’s triage center: the FOMC. We hear dire warnings about the government’s debt and the statutory debt limit. Threats are made, promises of doomsday echo from the same ratings agencies who saw fit to apply AAA ratings to junk mortgage bonds and will mercilessly downgrade the PIIGS for problems that are several orders of magnitude less than what we face.

Joe America is largely unfazed, however. Sure, there are pockets of hurt, and there are many, many people who have re-evaluated their personal situations and have embraced individual austerity. Yet in the aggregate, we’re back on the credit card. It is hard to discern at this point whether the uptick in borrowing is for essentials or discretionary goods. Based on the anecdotal evidence, it is likely both. People have been trained to borrow, make minimum payments, and to live as a servant to the creditor. When you think about it, the ‘money’ that has been used to create this servitude has been created from nothing, yet must be repaid with something very real – the sweat of one’s brow. Hardly seems like a fair deal to me, yet we not only accept it, we demand it. Have we really spent any time thinking about these matters? It is almost funny when I look at the latest opinion polls regarding the national debt. The vast majority of Americans think that Congress needs to put the country’s fiscal house in order, yet most of those same people refuse to do it in their own backyard.

Yes, America is in dire need of a mental paradigm shift towards a simpler life, with less emphasis on accumulation of toys and materialism and more of an emphasis on stewardship and restoring the economic environment that allowed this country to become what it was. That should be our mandate. However, I am a realist and I know deep down that most will not heed this or any other call for a change of thinking. Unfortunately, history is firmly on the side of this pessimistic disposition. I have decided in my time off to focus at the micro level instead of the macro level. My days of open letters to Congress and calls to economic action are over. My days of open letters to individuals have begun. These commentaries and my firm’s newsletter will be geared more towards helping individuals who recognize our changing world to adjust, cope, and prepare for what is inevitable rather than attempting to convince those who will continue to deny the obvious until the time for meaningful action has long passed.

These words are not meant to be harsh, but have come over months of reflection as I’ve had some time to ruminate over the human condition and its predilection to lemming-like behavior. The one silver lining in all this is that if people live more responsibly and in a simpler manner from a financial perspective, they will be taking many of the steps that will be necessary for the preparation of the effects of peak oil. Yes, peak oil is real. Even the big banks are now talking about ‘resource constraints’ in the energy space and figuring it into their forecasts. Oil companies are hammering like crazy in the Marcellus shales to bring natural gas to market that hasn’t sold for over $5.50 a thousand in what seems to be a dog’s life.

If you are one of those people who understand these matters, then this column and anything else I can do to help are here for you to utilize. From here forward this work will be dedicated to the awakened rather than to the process of awakening. If you’re not there yet, there are plenty of mainstream media outlets that will gladly satiate your desire for information.

This month’s Centsible Investor Keynote will focus on the debt ceiling, government debt in general, and most importantly, some steps you can take on an individual basis to assist you in mitigating the effects of continued runaway borrowing. In addition, we’ll provide our traditional analysis of energy, precious metals, and the major financial markets. For more information, click here.

Total Government Debt at $61.9 Trillion?

Editor’s Note: Too bad these numbers are 5 years old. Either that or their methodology is incorrect. The real number is well north of $200 Trillion.

The federal government’s financial condition deteriorated rapidly last year, far beyond the $1.5 trillion in new debt taken on to finance the budget deficit, a USA TODAY analysis shows.

The government added $5.3 trillion in new financial obligations in 2010, largely for retirement programs such as Medicare and Social Security. That brings to a record $61.6 trillion the total of financial promises not paid for.

This gap between spending commitments and revenue last year equals more than one-third of the nation’s gross domestic product.

Medicare alone took on $1.8 trillion in new liabilities, more than the record deficit prompting heated debate between Congress and the White House over lifting the debt ceiling.

Social Security added $1.4 trillion in obligations, partly reflecting longer life expectancies. Federal and military retirement programs added more to the financial hole, too.

Corporations would be required to count these new liabilities when they are taken on — and report a big loss to shareholders. Unlike businesses, however, Congress postpones recording spending commitments until it writes a check.

The $61.6 trillion in unfunded obligations amounts to $534,000 per household. That’s more than five times what Americans have borrowed for everything else — mortgages, car loans and other debt. It reflects the challenge as the number of retirees soars over the next 20 years and seniors try to collect on those spending promises.

“The (federal) debt only tells us what the government owes to the public. It doesn’t take into account what’s owed to seniors, veterans and retired employees,” says accountant Sheila Weinberg, founder of the Institute for Truth in Accounting, a Chicago-based group that advocates better financial reporting. “Without accurate accounting, we can’t make good decisions.”

Michael Lind, policy director at the liberal New America Foundation‘s economic growth program, says there is no near-term crisis for federal retirement programs and that economic growth will make these programs more affordable.

“The false claim that Social Security and Medicare are about to bankrupt the United States has been repeated for decades by conservatives and libertarians who pretend that their ideological opposition to these successful and cost-effective programs is based on worries about the deficit,” he says.

USA TODAY has calculated federal finances based on standard accounting rules since 2004 using data from the Medicare and Social Security annual reports and the little-known audited financial report of the federal government.

The government has promised pension and health benefits worth more than $700,000 per retired civil servant. The pension fund’s key asset: federal IOUs.

Greenspan ‘Scared’ Over Deficit

Editor’s Note: I’m not sure who these people think will actually believe this. Alan Greenspan and the system he is servant to caused this deficit, yet he’s scared of it. This would be funny if it weren’t so serious.

The debt and deficit problem in the US is so serious that former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan finds himself in the position of recommending the highest tax rates in more than a decade.

In an interview with CNBC, the former central bank chief described himself as a “small government, free-market economist” who nonetheless believes that in order to raise revenue and close the debt gap, 1990s-era taxes must be reinstituted.

It’s a measure, he said, of how serious the problem has become.

“The fact that I am in favor of going back to the Clinton tax structure is merely an indicator of how scared I am of this debt problem that has emerged and its order of magnitude,” he said.

The marginal tax rates fell in the early 2000s under former President George W. Bush, who instituted sweeping cuts that last year were renewed in a deal between President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans.

But the rates, particularly those on Americans earning more than $200,000 a year, have been the focus of intense debate and are considered in peril depending on how next year’s elections go. Congressional Democrats see higher taxes as a key to raising revenue to close the budget gap.

Greenspan expressed concern over the tenor of negotiations in Washington. He also endorsed the deficit cuts from Rep. Paul Ryan (R.-Wisc.) that have run into strong opposition due to targeting Medicare and Medicaid.

“If I had my own way, I like the Ryan budget in all respects and I think that essentially that sort of thing is what I would vote for if in fact we’re voting,” he said. “But the problem essentially is that is not going to get a majority vote in Congress or be signed by the president of the United States. The question is, what’s my fallback position?”

Telling America’s aging population that its entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare will survive without significant changes is dishonest, Greenspan added.

“It’s not an issue of saying we’re going to have a choice for what we’re going to do. We don’t have the physical resources,” he said. The government is telling people “they’re guaranteed their medical services, and I think that’s not accurate. We cannot do that granted our lack of resources.”

Yet Greenspan said Congress has no choice but to approve raising the debt ceiling as the US would risk catastrophe if it does not meet its obligations.

“The problem is we’re all going and maneuvering around and as the days pass we’re getting closer and closer to the debt ceiling,” said Greenspan, who called Washington brinkmanship on the issue an “extraordinarily dangerous problem for this country.”

“What’s happening now is that there’s a realization of how serious this problem is and everyone is coming together to talk,” he said. “But compromise…?”

Americans Lower Expectations for Making Money

Published on: 06/03/2011
Comments: No Comments

Squeezed on both sides by stagnant wages and rising prices, consumers believe the chances of bringing home more money one year from now are at their lowest in 25 years, according to analysis of survey data by Goldman Sachs.

Goldman’s economist Jan Hatzius looked at the University of Michigan and Thomson Reuters poll, which asks consumers whether they believe their family income will rise more than inflation in the next 12 months. Hatzius applied a six-month moving average to smooth out the data and found that wage pessimism is at its lowest in more than two decades.

“Households are already very pessimistic about future real income growth,” wrote Goldman’s economist to clients. “A slowdown in job growth would presumably translate into a further deterioration in (expected and actual) real income growth. This would heighten the downside risks to our current forecast that real consumer spending will grow 2.5 percent to 3 percent over the next year and might call for another downward revision to our forecast for US GDP growth in 2011 and 2012.”

Real hourly wages have dropped 2.1 percent on an annualized basis over the past six months, a rate of decline not seen in 20 years, according to Goldman. This analysis is backed up by the other most-watched consumer survey from the Conference Board, which indicated earlier this week that the proportion of consumers expecting their incomes to increase was below 15 percent in May.

“I am much more concerned that the second half resurgence we all expect never arrives and by early 2012 we are in a recession,” said Joe Terranova, chief market strategist for Virtus Investment Partners and a ‘Fast Money’ trader.
yield broke below 3 percent Wednesday as investors bought bonds as a safehaven in case of the slowing economy.

The fact that income expectations are so low, makes the jobs outlook that much more important, argues Goldman and other investors. These same surveys show that consumers are not nearly as pessimistic about job growth. So once enthusiasm on the labor front is dented at all, then all aspects of consumer confidence are lost.

“The labor market is particularly important because household finances currently seem even more dependent on job growth than they are normally,” said Hatzius.

A typical recovery pattern goes like this: stock market bottoms, economic growth bottoms and then hiring and wage increases return. What’s unique and scary about this recovery is that the last piece of the recovery is not there.

In the 2001 recession, the country lost 2 percent of jobs from peak employment and then made that back in a 48- month cycle, according to data from money management firm Trutina Financial. In 1990, the jobs lost during the recession were recovered in 30 months. Right now, about 38 months from peak employment during the housing boom, there are still six percent fewer jobs out there. Making up that amount of jobs in 10 months or less would be unprecedented, if not impossible.

“The crawl out of this economic ditch is going to be long and slow,” said Patty Edwards, chief investment officer at Trutina. “Even if they’re employed, many consumers aren’t earnings what they were two years ago, either because they’re in lower-paying jobs or not getting as many hours.”

Forbes Predicts Return to Gold Standard Within 5 Years

Published on: 05/11/2011
Comments: No Comments

A return to the gold standard by the United States within the next five years now seems likely, because that move would help the nation solve a variety of economic, fiscal, and monetary ills, Steve Forbes predicted during an exclusive interview this week with HUMAN EVENTS.

“What seems astonishing today could become conventional wisdom in a short period of time,” Forbes said.

Such a move would help to stabilize the value of the dollar, restore confidence among foreign investors in U.S. government bonds, and discourage reckless federal spending, the media mogul and former presidential candidate said.  The United States used gold as the basis for valuing the U.S. dollar successfully for roughly 180 years before President Richard Nixon embarked upon an experiment to end the practice in the 1970s that has contributed to a number of woes that the country is suffering from now, Forbes added.

If the gold standard had been in place in recent years, the value of the U.S. dollar would not have weakened as it has and excessive federal spending would have been curbed, Forbes told HUMAN EVENTS.  The constantly changing value of the U.S. dollar leads to marketplace uncertainty and consequently spurs speculation in commodity investing as a hedge against inflation.

The only probable 2012 U.S. presidential candidate who has championed a return to the gold standard so far is Rep. Ron Paul (R.-Tex.).  But the idea “makes too much sense” not to gain popularity as the U.S. economy struggles to create jobs, recover from a housing bubble induced by the Federal Reserve’s easy-money policies, stop rising gasoline prices, and restore fiscal responsibility to U.S. government’s budget, Forbes insisted.

With a stable currency, it is “much harder” for governments to borrow excessively, Forbes said.  Without lax Federal Reserve System monetary policies that led to the printing of too much money, the housing bubble would not have been nearly as severe, he added.

“When it comes to exchange rates and monetary policy, people often don’t grasp” what is at stake for the economy, Forbes said.  By restoring the gold standard, the United States would shift away from “less responsible policies” and toward a stronger dollar and a stronger America, he said.  “If the dollar was as good as gold, other countries would want to buy it.”

An encouraging sign for Forbes is that key lawmakers besides Rep. Paul are recognizing that the Fed is straying well beyond its intended role of promoting stable prices and full employment with its monetary policies.

Forbes cited Rep. Paul Ryan (R.-Wis.), who, he believes, understands monetary policy better than most lawmakers and has shown a willingness to ask tough but necessary questions.  For example, when Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke appeared before the House Budget Committee in February, Ryan, who chairs the panel, asked Bernanke bluntly how many jobs the Fed’s quantitative-easing program had helped to create.

Politicians need to “get over” the notion that the Fed can guide the economy with monetary policy.  The Fed is like a “bull in a China shop,” Forbes said.  “It can’t help but knock things down.”

“People know that something is wrong with the dollar,” Forbes concluded.  “You cannot trash your money without repercussions.”

Americans NEVER Seem to Learn

Editor’s Note: So we’re back at the credit card spending spree again – this time at much higher rates. Americans are the dimmest people on Earth apparently as they just can’t stop borrowing, yet will demand their government do exactly that. Don’t you people realize that is your borrowing that allows the Fed to rob you with inflation?? Well, you’ve made your beds; now llie well in them.

U.S. consumer borrowing rose for a sixth straight month in March, led by a gain in non-revolving credit, which includes auto loans, and a pickup in credit-card use.

The $6 billion increase followed a $7.6 billion rise in February, the Federal Reserve said today in Washington. Economists projected a $5 billion gain in the measure of credit card debt and non-revolving loans for March, according to the median forecast in a Bloomberg News survey.

Payroll gains may be giving Americans the ability to ratchet up their borrowing. Employers last month added more jobs than forecast, indicating the economic expansion is withstanding higher fuel prices. – Propaganda

“Consumers are feeling a little more confident about the economic outlook and their own financial situation,” said Russell Price, senior economist at Ameriprise Financial Inc. in Detroit. “Things will improve incrementally from here. As job growth continues, we should continue to see pretty good consumer spending.” Then why is consumer confidence falling????

Estimates in the Bloomberg survey of 37 economists ranged from gains of $2 billion to $8 billion after a previously reported $7.6 billion rise in February.

The U.S. added 244,000 jobs in April, a report from the Labor Department showed today. Economists projected a 185,000 increase, according to the median estimate in a Bloomberg survey. The jobless rate rose to 9 percent.

Credit Cards

Revolving debt, which includes credit cards, increased $1.9 billion in March, the second gain in four months, according to today’s Fed data. Non-revolving debt, including educational loans and loans for autos and mobile homes, rose $4.1 billion for the month. The Fed’s report doesn’t track debt secured by real estate, such as home equity lines of credit.

The increase in non-revolving debt was led by an unadjusted $6.2 billion rise in federal government lending for education.

Auto sales in March slipped to a seasonally adjusted 13.06 million annual rate from 13.38 million a month earlier, according to industry reports.

“We continue to see good solid signs of progress despite some of the challenges that remain” for the economy, Don Johnson, vice president of U.S. sales for General Motors Co., said during an April 1 teleconference. “A recovering job market is going to be the most important factor for the U.S. economy at this stage, and we do anticipate that this is going to continue to improve.”

American Express

American Express Co., the biggest issuer based on customer spending, announced April 21 that first-quarter profit increased and that it reduced funds set aside to cover bad loans.

“Total revenues grew at the healthiest pace since before the recession,” Kenneth I. Chenault, chief executive officer of American Express, said in a statement. No kidding; you keep increasing your rates!

Capital One Financial Corp. reported the same day that its first-quarter profit also rose as fewer credit-card borrowers defaulted.

“The period of shrinking loans through the Great Recession came to an end,” Richard D. Fairbank, chief executive officer at Capital One, said in the statement.

« page 4 of 18 »

Welcome , today is Friday, 05/18/2012