Tags: commodities

Old School Rules for a new era

I genuinely feel sorry for Barack Obama. As a political independent, it really didn’t matter to me who won back in November. I tend to view things from a more pragmatic stance, particularly when it comes to the immutable laws of economics. When observed in the context of history, political affiliations don’t seem to matter too much. Since we totally abandoned our monetary discipline in 1971, deficit spending, debt accumulation, and devaluation of the currency have transcended everything – political affiliations included. So as we begin a new era, I want to remind everyone of some old axioms – which still rule the day:

1) You don’t clean up spilled milk by spilling even more.

2) Actions have reactions and sometimes the reactions are not what you thought they’d be.

3) A nation cannot borrow and spend its way to prosperity.

4) Neither can a nation print its way to prosperity.

5) Government is the least efficient vehicle for implementing anything, but is unrivaled when it comes to destroying it.

Perhaps most importantly, 37 years of monetary imprudence is not undone in a month, six months, a year, or even a Presidential term. It doesn’t matter who you are, how good you are, or what party you belong to. Even if the mistakes stopped today, it would probably take the better part of a generation to recover from the debt and lack of productive output which currently encumbers us.

I will say that President Obama could have done both his credibility and the American taxpayer a huge favor by taking a pass on the lavish inauguration festivities. There is work to be done; the time for partying was in November. Now is the time to lead, roll up our sleeves and get to work. I will say that I am quite sure I’d be making the same comments had John McCain been sworn in today. Whether or not stocks are in a bear market is open for debate. However, the bear market in leadership in America shows no signs of ending.

2009 – The Song remains the same

Just when everyone thought we’d  heard the last of it. Just when you thought it was safe to turn on the evening news. Not quite – yet another bailout is being crafted as Bank of America needs even more of your tax dollars and the Treasury is on the job and ready to help.

Markets in typical fashion have been playing the emotional rollercoaster as rumor after rumor shot across the news ticker. Yes help is on the way – up go the markets. Oh wait, BofA might not get as much as they wanted – boom! stocks go down. And so the day and week have gone.

The fact that literally hundreds of billions of dollars in retirement accounts which consist of almost completely unrelated assets can hinge on whether more tax dollars will be thrown into the BofA black hole should tell us that something is terribly wrong here. 2009 it would seem is getting started exactly where 2008 left off.

Themes for 2009

Published on: 01/08/2009
Categories: My Two Cents
Comments: No Comments

2009 has certainly started off with a bang. While the financial markets have been rather quiet, underlying economic fundamentals continue to deteriorate.  Unfortunately, the rubber-stamped response to this deterioration has been nothing short of more of the same. More debt, more deficit spending, and more subterfuge to insist that it just isn’t so. The monetary stops have been pulled as the Federal government has gone public with its intentions. The biggest problem with this is that what we’re hearing now is what was going on six months ago. The idea of persistent trillion dollar deficits has been firmly planted with absolutely no mention of an exit strategy or how the Congress is planning on paying back these exorbitant amounts of borrowing. What is going on right now is downright frightening to non-Keynesians as we are desperately looking at these initiatives for something – anything that will cause real capital formation or foster genuine economic growth. Unfortunately, the ultimate plan appears to be something along the lines of taking a pebble and putting a rock on top of it, followed by a cement block, followed by a boulder. And the American taxpayer is the pebble; about to be crushed by ten generations worth of debt accumulated before we even reach the next decade.

In a classic journalistic transgression, the Congressional Budget Office stole most of the thunder of our first theme for 2009 – a blowout in the Federal deficit as the government, almost out of options, pulls out all the stops and piles it on taking the national debt curve parabolic. Here are some of the related issues as we see them for 2009:

States circle the wagons for bailouts

California, New York, and as many as 29 other states are already in fiscal extremis as revenues plunge due to unemployment and decreasing tax receipts. States are faced with difficult choices in 2009. They can raise taxes, cut services, beg for a bailout, or in all likelihood all of the above. And in a typical ironic twist of fate, the market for municipal bonds is drying up just when the states are going to need the money most. To make matters worse, yields on municipal bonds blew out to nearly 2.2 times the yields on corresponding Treasury issues. This is more than twice the .96 historic level normally observed. Obviously, the message here is that the perception of security is gone. We pointed out this likely eventuality when MBIA and AMBAC came under duress and saw their credit ratings cut back in June. Not only are the bonds questionable, but their insurance is as well. The bottom line here is that if bond issues can be sold, investors will command much higher yields resulting in greater debt servicing costs. Initial forecasts for 2009 indicate that there will be a 6% decrease in new bond issues sold, taking the total down to around $364 Billion.

The Goverbank buys Municipal Bonds

Goverbank – n – The combination of the debt-issuing Federal Reserve and the debt-assigning US Treasury.

Because of the realities above, and a worsening cash crunch at the state and local level, the Goverbank will begin buying bond issues in 2009. Obviously, this is a common sense conclusion given the actions already observed as the Goverbank has inserted itself as the buyer of last resort in numerous other markets already. However, it serves to drive home one of the important themes moving forward: there will be no market or bailout too large for the monetary authorities to undertake. $700 Billion was only the beginning. The buying of Muni bond issues will also lessen the funds required to service the debt by creating artificially low rates. This will prevent the need for even further taxpayer-funded municipal bailouts – but only on the surface. Think of the classic shell game; either way you’re paying for it.

Private sector businesses and industries beg for bailouts

Already the steel and newspaper industries have stated their intention to vie for government bailout money. The TARP (already overspent) is going to have to be stretched much further. While some in the media will point the semantical issue that the second half of the money hasn’t yet been released, it would be foolish to conclude that this will not happen. Sure, there may be some pandering and political posturing, but in the end the second $350 Billion will be released and distributed. In reality, the number is much higher than that already. It is very likely that we will see retail chains, more financial intermediaries, and scads of other businesses that rely on discretionary consumer spending in front of Congress as well in 2009. It is no accident that consumer staples companies did the best in 2008. The rest will soon be on Capitol Hill with hat in hand. The die has been cast – any industry that experiences malaise will want TARP money. A rather humorous story emerged last night, as apparently Larry Flynt is now demanding a bailout for the ‘entertainment’ industry. Incredible, but should come as no surprise. Expect more of this in 2009.

Creative financing will re-emerge to induce more borrowing

In an economy that is almost totally reliant on debt and spending, a cessation or curtailing of either of these activities will cause immediate problems. At this point, with negative savings rates having persisted since at least 2005, it is more imperative than ever that consumers continue to borrow and spend. The problem is how to induce this? The easy solution in 2001 was to put the pedal to the metal, drive interest rates down and create phony home ‘equity’ that could be easily tapped for almost any purpose. It should be noted that when home equity loans were first introduced the money had to be used for some type of noble purpose such as education or improving the property. No more. The big question now is how will consumers be cajoled into borrowing even more money? Look to the same folks who created adjustable rate and reverse amortization mortgages for the answer. Creative financing will be back in 2009. And I don’t just mean 0% interest loans. Any machination that allows payment to be put off until a later date will do. 12, 24, and 36 months interest-free. No payments for 12 months. Partial payments for 12 months. No down payment and we’ll make the first 3 monthly installments for you. We’ve already seen these before, but they’ll become commonplace in 2009. Look for new ones as well with longer payments terms, which ironically means you’ll end up paying even more for the items. However, the focus will be on the ‘low monthly payments’. Stimulus checks may not be checks at all, but may rather have a requirement for consumption attached. All indications are that the framers of the last stimulus package were unhappy because not enough of the money was spent. Apparently some people actually paid bills and/or saved the money. Maybe Wal-Mart and Home Depot Gift Cards will be the delivery method for the next economic stimulus. I’m only half joking about this.

2009 – The Bottom Line

In the end, the answer will be the same as it has always been – money printing. We have known this for a long time and the proof continues to come in each day in our news headlines. The government believes that only it can save us from certain financial destruction. And it will do so by employing the same policies that got us into this mess to begin with. Amazing. History has borne out this reality ever since the invention of fractional reserve banking and the printing press. The quantity of Dollars in your bank account may be guaranteed. There will be enough Dollars created to permit all the states, private firms, Bernie Madoff, and perhaps even Santa Claus to avoid insolvency. Bankruptcy, however, has been replaced by receivership. Firms will no longer go bankrupt; they will be absorbed in a giant asset consolidation. Bear Stearns, AIG, Fannie, Freddie, WaMu, Citigroup, and Lehman are all examples of this new financial hierarchy. There will be plenty of Dollars. The problem Main Street will face in 2009 and beyond is twofold.

Monitoring and maintaining the VALUE of the currency will be the challenge. When and if the spigots are opened and these new Dollars cascade into the real economy, the value of existing Dollars will be destroyed in a very short period of time. Consequently, prices will skyrocket. Secondly, as has been pointed out before in previous articles, recognizing the transition will be key. It may happen slowly or it may happen quickly. Much of the effort of the Treasury so far has been aimed at controlling the flow of the fresh money to avoid touching off a hyperinflationary spiral. These developments will require constant analysis as 2009 unfolds.

Ultimately, the quantity of a fiat currency is easily manipulated. However, it is the value that is much harder to maintain.  Preserving value will be your challenge in 2009 – and ours along with you.

Disclosures:  Long MCD, XLP

Even more of the same

Published on: 12/30/2008
Comments: No Comments

Today, markets posted brisk gains after the Treasury Department handed GMAC, a freshly anointed bank holding company, $5 billion in bailout money. According to GM, the logic is to loan the money at 0% in the hopes of selling a few cars. Hold on a second. When this bailout was rammed down the public’s throat in the beginning of October, we were told that we as taxpayers would receive a competitive return on our ‘investment’.

Apparently, the return on this investment will be 0%. And ironically enough, thanks to the mischievous Fed, 0% is now a competitive return. If this isn’t enough to convince the American people that the fix is in, then I think it is time to start auctioning off that prime oceanfront property in North Dakota. After all, Bismarck isn’t on the Case-Schiller top 20 Wall of Shame – yet.

And in what is a completely atypical response, even Marketwatch questioned the sanity of this strategy:

“But wait. Wasn’t it a flood of cheap money and rampant consumerism that landed the U.S. economy in its current pickle?

Well, yes. But according to GM, we’ll just have to sort that out later. Right now, the primary objective is to use credit to move inventory. This is crucial because the industry — from suppliers to manufacturers to dealers — is starved for liquidity. Now they’ve got it.

The question now is how far will it go? Or will it work at all?

Will a nation where consumer confidence is at an all-time low, where home values are falling and unemployment rising at alarming rates, rush to showrooms to buy a new Trailblazer?”

The next step is to hand the cash to households at 0% in a futile hope of getting them to spend on other things. While many might view such a development as a positive one, we know how that story ends. Got Gold?

Top Stories of 2008

12/24/2008

2008 will likely go down in history as the year when all those dire predictions made by Austrian thinkers over the past few years finally came to pass. Decades of excesses finally caught up to America, and in traditional fashion, those in authority tried valiantly to negate those excesses with even more of the same. So, to conclude the year, we’ll dig into some of the top stories of 2008. Next week we’ll discuss the top stories of 2009 and how they are likely to shape our country and world moving forward.

#4 – The Fed blows up yet another bubble

Conventional wisdom said that the Fed was out of bubbles to blow up once the housing market fell apart (and continues to do so). True, the home was probably the most convenient way that people could be cajoled into borrowing money on ‘equity’ that in fact never really existed to begin with. However, the Fed properly understands the relationship between debt and economic growth in a fiat monetary system. As such, Fed governors know that the American public must continue to borrow money. They also know that the US government, like consumers, is flat broke and needs to borrow money. So the Fed is now using its member banks to indirectly monetize debt. Put simply, the Fed creates money from nothing, then exchanges it for bad assets on the balance sheet of its member banks. The banks get rid of the toxic assets, then take the Fed’s new money and buy US Treasuries. The government ends up with the fresh money, and you the taxpayer have not only the responsibility to pay the principal back, but also to make interest payments to the Fed (vis a vis its member banks) in the meantime. In doing this, the prices of US government bonds have gone parabolic, and correspondingly, yields are now scraping against the ocean floor.

The net result of this is that savers are further punished by near zero or even negative rates of return on short-term money market instruments and other debt that as recently as a year ago were paying north of 4% interest. On the consumer side of things, mortgage rates have dipped significantly. The idea here is to stimulate borrowing by creating (once again) artificially low interest rates. Doesn’t this sound familiar – a la 2001? One problem is that banks are not lending like they were in 2001. Ironically, they are invoking lending standards again even though the Fed has almost completely eliminated risk from the equation! While money is available, it is generally available to only those with the best credit at the lower rates. The rest it seems need not apply. On the other side of the ledger, consumers are in much worse shape overall than they were in 2001. In many cases, mortgages are underwater, there is no ‘equity’ to be tapped, and credit card balances are higher than ever. In addition, the one means of supporting a debt lifestyle (employment) is being yanked out from under many people as weekly unemployment claims and monthly job loss numbers continue to mount at an alarming rate.

#3 – Energy price whiplash

From the perspective of energy prices, 2008 was a tale of two cities. For the first six months of the year, the headlines were about rising oil prices, potential shortages, and record gasoline prices. The second half the year featured a complete 180 degree turn with the entire move from January 2007 through July 2008 being erased and then some. As I pen this article, prices are threatening the $35/bbl level for crude oil and $5.50 for natural gas. In typical fashion, the financial media once again missed the real story here. The post-election revelation that the US has been in a recession since at least late 2007 was no real surprise to many of us, but underscored one of the points we have tried to establish all along in these weekly commentaries. Inflation is a monetary event, not an economic one. The fact that the largest run-up of oil prices in history came at a time when the US was in a recession throws water all over the idea that increasing prices are caused by economic growth alone. As has now been proven rather nicely this past year, that assertion could not be more wrong.

However, the real story behind the violent gyrations in oil prices and the markets in general is two-fold. First, the gyrations are indicative of a dying monetary system and rampant misinformation as ‘investors’, under the influence of mainstream media race first in one direction, then in another in a frantic attempt to predict the next bubble. These are the dynamics that have caused massive dislocations in bonds, stocks, currencies, and commodities over the past year. The fiat foundation is shaking beneath us. Secondly, the dynamics of petroleum supply are fragile, and such violent price swings and false market signals will have dire consequences moving forward. This issue will be discussed in greater detail next week, but in simple terms, we will see petroleum shortages because of this mess – likely in the next year to 18 months.

#2 – Congress – Out to lunch

If Congress’ approval rating was at an all time low going into this mess, it will be interesting to see what its approval rating is coming out of it. In our experience, it is very difficult to find two people to rub together who feel Congress has done a good job for the American people. Whether it is the financial industry bailout, the auto bailout, energy policy, Congressional raises, or a myriad of other issues, 2008 has been a year where Congress has earned it self a big, red F- as public servants. Congress’ actions this year are not a cause for much optimism moving forward. There is no doubt now that we are facing a crisis unlike anything seen in the last 100 years. There is little doubt amongst most of us that we are in no way ready to deal with it. We’re certainly able, but not ready.

Unfortunately, when it comes to getting common sense policy, don’t look towards Congress. Common sense policy would require a significant degree of economic pain for Americans. Congress is in the business of appeasing, not causing economic pain, and as such is impotent when it comes to solving any of our problems – financial or otherwise. Any decisions made by the 534 (minus Ron Paul because he knows what needs to be done) will be an attempt to further postpone the inevitable, and ultimately, will end up making it worse. While the ineffectiveness of Congress is not a story in and of itself, nor should it be a surprise, it serves as a confirmation of the belief that in a crisis, Congress almost always does the wrong thing.

#1 – Banks stay silent on bailout and Fed money

Thankfully, this is a story that the mainstream financial press is actually starting to pay some attention to. A few weeks ago, Bloomberg news filed a Freedom of Information Act request for full disclosure by the Federal Reserve for the trillions in loans it has given out. It must be remembered that these trillions are totally separate from the $700 Billion authorized by Congress in early October. The flimsy excuse given by the Fed for telling both Bloomberg and the American people to fly a kite was that they didn’t want to cause ‘anxiety’ in the markets. If people knew who got the money, then they might actually be able to make informed decisions regarding the health of those companies. Can’t have that, can we? So instead, the Fed has maintained a cloak of secrecy, which has served the purpose of spooking the entire market. This lack of transparency is partly responsible for getting us into this mess. Of course, even more of it will get us out of the mess. That seems to be the prevailing logic at work these days.

But there is more to the story.On 12/22/08, The Associated Press, to its credit, released a story about what is going on with regard to the more widely understood $700 Billion financial rescue package. At least in the case of this money, we have an idea of who got what. Unfortunately the transparency stops there. Here are some notable quotes from banking executives regarding TARP funds:

“We have not disclosed that to the public. We’re declining to.” Thomas Kelly – JP Morgan Chase – rec’d $25 Billion from the TARP

“We’re not providing dollar-in, dollar-out tracking.” Barry Koling – SunTrust – rec’d $3.5 Billion from the TARP

“We manage our capital in its aggregate.” Tim Deighton – Regions Financial – rec’d $3.5 Billion from the TARP

This is the attitude that the big banks have towards you, the taxpayer, who saved their jobs, their billion dollar bonuses, and their companies. The frightening thing about this situation is that the hubris of the financial industry as a whole has continued to mount despite the fact that they are constantly having to beg Congress for more of your money. Where has this money gone? At this point, the only valid assumption, in the absence of disclosure by the banks, is that the money is being stolen. The increasing likelihood that we are witnessing the biggest bank robbery of all time makes this story a dead wringer for #1.

Please accept our most sincere wishes for a joyous Christmas season and a healthy New Year – from all of us at Sutton & Associates and “My Two Cents”.

Will 2009 be the year?

There is a growing chorus among mainstream financial reporters and the corresponding ‘experts’ they trot out every 15 minutes. That almost all of these people are singing from the same songbook is definitely a cause for concern. They’re all saying 2009 is going to be year you won’t want to miss for stocks. You need to buy, buy hard, buy often, and most importantly, buy now.

Buyer beware

Conventional wisdom with regards to investing is that you don’t buy until there is blood in the streets. It is amazing the everyday folks that are now repeating that phrase to me in during the course of recent advisory sessions. Granted, a 45% decline in most major indices might qualify as blood in the streets, but is it over?

At best America is headed into a period where there is going to be little or no growth for the next 3-5 years. This assumes that the Fed and the rest can keep things held together with printed money (after all, that’s what they do and the printing press is their only tool). This is a pretty weighty assumption, but even if this is the case, there is going to be little support for higher stock prices in 2009. Let me float something else out there. Since the assumption by the media and the ‘experts’ so far is that the recession is near conclusion, wouldn’t it make sense that we’re going to see another down leg in stocks once everyone figures out this recession isn’t going away so quickly, and is in fact, getting worse? Some food for thought before you go and pull the trigger and put whatever you’ve got left after this year’s shellacking back into the markets.

Keep in mind also how many of the ‘experts’ make money. They make it on commissions. If you’re on the sidelines protecting yourself, they don’t make money. The commission-based folks are easy to spot – to them it is always time to buy into stocks. They were buying in November 2007, they were buying last summer, and they were buying this past fall. It will likely take their clients years to recover.

Our weekly radio show “Beat the Street” is in the process of doing a 2 part series on how to choose and assess financial professionals. We give you the questions you need to ask these folks, and tell you what red flags to look for in your dealings with them. The first part of the series is posted at CIC, and can be found by clicking the link below

Beat the Street – Is your advisor up to the Task? – Part 1

I would like to personally wish everyone a joyous Christmas and holiday season and the best for 2009 and remind everyone that our Centsible Investor subscription specials end on 12/31/08. Take advantage and lock in our low introductory rate today by clicking below:

Subscribe to “The Centsible Investor”

Follow the Money

In the current climate, where the overriding opinion of most mainstream financial commentators is that deficit spending is a good thing and the only thing better than one bailout is two bailouts, it is time to inject a bit of logic and sanity.

Sure, I made the argument in last week’s edition that IF the Feds are going to throw over $8 Trillion at the financial system which produces nothing, why not throw Big Auto a bone? At least they produce something. However, this line of reasoning should not be taken as any kind of endorsement of our Bail-o-Matic Congress or its actions.

The thing that gets me is that we still haven’t gotten an answer from anyone in charge telling us where all this money is going to come from. Sure we know, but it would be nice to hear it. As the crisis deepens and bailouts become a common word, the real danger is that the American public will become desensitized to the sheer magnitude of these short-sighted, but long-lasting commitments. There was a time not too long ago when a million dollars was a lot of money. Someone who had a million dollars was thought to be set for life. The sad fact: today, a freshly minted (sarcasm mine) millionaire could earn a whopping $30,900/year on his money if he invested in 30-year Treasury Bonds. Or he could have put it into DOW index funds last year and would now have around $620,000. No, a million dollars certainly doesn’t seem like a lot of money these days.

More recently, we have shifted to discussing things in terms of billions. The Bear Stearns problem back in March cost us $30 Billion. The taxpayers were assured we’d get a good return on that money. However, as of 12/4, Maiden Lane, LLC which was created to house the Bear Stearns mess has seen its value drop from nearly $30 billion to just a tad over $21 Billion. The US taxpayer has lost nearly a third of its investment already. AIG started out at $85 Billion and has grown to double that in just a few months. All in all, Congress has pledged $700 Billion, and the Federal Reserve has, to date, cranked around another $7.6 Trillion at the problem. And that number gets bigger every day.
Looking at news headlines, it would seem that even a billion dollars is not a lot of money these days.

Let’s take a second and put this into a perspective that everyone can understand. The analogy is especially fitting at this time of year. Let’s send the average family of 4 to the mall for a shopping trip. Let’s assume they can each spend $1000 every hour. If they set out to spend a million dollars, do you think they could finish before Christmas? Even if they shopped for 16 hours a day, they’d finish on 12/26 – too late!

How about the same family trying to spend a billion Dollars? Spending at the same rate, it would take them nearly 43 years, shopping 16 hours a day, 365 days a year, spending $1000/hour each. 43 years to crank through a billion dollars.

How about a trillion? We’d better add the aunts, uncles, and cousins for this one. Let’s say we can get 20 people spending $1000/hour each, 16 hours a day, 365 days per year. How long do you think it would take for them to spend $1 trillion? A whopping 85,616 YEARS.

To put it in perspective, the bailout of the S&L crisis in the late 1980’s was envisioned to cost around $80 billion total at the time. We have already pledged 100 times that amount to fix this mess, and if you’re thinking the same way I am, you know that this is nowhere near over.

Obviously, our government doesn’t have any of this money. The National Debt Clock has gotten quite a bit of publicity recently in that they had to shut it down for a while so they could figure out how to add another digit because we’d crossed the $10 Trillion mark. I made the rather snide remark at the time that they should probably just add a couple more digits while they were at it. Now it doesn’t seem so snide anymore especially given the situation that already exists with unfunded liabilities from Social Security and Medicare. We’re going to need an awful lot of money while having precious little of it.

Which brings us full circle to the news of the day. Oil demand will plummet over the next few years says the World Bank. So will the price of commodities. They are predicting a global recession that will be the worst since the Great Depression. And I totally agree with their prediction of a severe recession. However, it is very clear from their position on prices that these people with impeccable credentials, education, and status as world renowned economists don’t know the first thing about how money works. They don’t understand even the most basic immutable laws of economics, the most important being that inflation is a monetary, not an economic event. They fail to understand that creating money and credit from nothing causes general price levels to increase regardless of the level of underlying economic activity.

Demand alone cannot cause general price levels to rise. Sure, demand can cause the price of one or even a few items to rise, but in a disciplined monetary system, money to pay higher prices for one product must be taken from the price paid for somewhere else. So as one price goes up, the price of something else will fall because the money simply doesn’t exist to support higher prices across the board. Also, demand is relatively constant when you think about it. People will always want things. The check and balance is the supply of available money and credit. Monetize demand and prices will rise regardless of underlying economic activity. If you want proof of this, go to an auction sometime and start handing out millions of dollars then watch what happens to the prices paid.

Now, consider the monetary environment within which we are operating at the present time. Much like the yields on short-term Treasury bills there is zero discipline. None. Money is being created on a massive and unprecedented scale. This is precisely why the banks are sitting on it. If this money were released en masse into the real economy, we would have hyperinflation at the precise time when economic activity is grinding to a halt.

The most useful thing that can be taken from the World Bank’s forecast is that they expect this money to remain penned up in the banking system for the foreseeable future. While this prediction, if true, would bring welcome relief in terms of prices, it is a rather dire prediction in that our economy relies on cheap money for its growth.

Disclosures: None

Saving Private Gettelfinger

As the night wore on and it became more and more apparent that the Big Car Bailout bill was going to meet its demise in the Senate, I became increasingly suspicious of the braggadocio of UAW Chief Gettelfinger who stubbornly has refused to make any concessions even when faced with the real possibility of the loss of many of the 3 million positions that his members currently fill. At this point, it would seem that drastic times call for drastic measures and that a pay cut is better than unemployment. At the same time I understand Mr. Gettelfinger is charged with protecting his membership, and is in fact under a legal obligation to do so. His is certainly not an enviable dilemma.

As the evening progressed, I began to wonder if there isn’t something else going on here. It would seem that despite the rejection of the Senate that the bailout issue is far from dead. Certainly, pressure could be applied on the outgoing Bush to tap the TARP. If Big Car can survive another 38 days, the new President could tap the TARP as well. Or the Fed, which has asserted in recent days that it might start making loans of its own to more than just its member banks could step in and provide an 11th hour kick-save for the auto industry.

This morning, Gettelfinger confirmed my suspicions to some degree during a morning radio interview in which he stated that there are still other ways to get the money Big Car wants. No wonder no concessions were made. The future of the auto industry, and a massive chunk of American manufacturing jobs are being auctioned to the highest bidder.

The $2 Trillion Government

Today’s Treasury Budget release, while being reported as though it were a surprise, confirms something we have known for a long time. Government has thrown caution to the wind and will print and spend endlessly in a futile attempt to stem the tide. For those not keeping score, the numbers looked something like this:

Jan 2008 – $17.8 Billion

Feb 2008 – $175.6 Billion

March 2008 – $48.1 Billion

April 2008 + 159.3 Billion

May 2008 – $165.9 Billion

June 2008 + $50.7 Billion

July 2008 – $102.8 Billion

August 2008 – $111.9 Billion

September 2008 + $45.7 Billion

October 2008 – $237.2 Billion

November 2008 – $164.4 Billion

December 2008 – ?

Clearly, the stresses of the massive financial industry bailout are starting to show up in the government’s deficit in a big way. Amazingly enough, the slackening in the trade deficit was promised to be the trend that balanced the government’s current account. But the trade deficit hasn’t cooperated all that much despite lower oil prices and the budget deficit is blowing wide open. In fact, over the past two months, the Federal government is running at an annual pace of $2.4 Trillion in budget shortfalls alone. Add in future bailouts, and the likely economic and fiscal stimulus and we’re talking about some serious money.

We have received a number of emails recently asking if we accept donations for the maintenance of both this website and our weekly radio shows heard on Contrary Investor’s Cafe If anyone is interested in supporting our work, we encourage them to consider a subscription to our monthly newsletter “The Centsible Investor”. Each month we analyze the markets and give subscribers the big picture of what is going on. We also maintain an income producing model portfolio, which has outperformed all the major index, and was maintaining 5.64% pullback since its inception in 11/2007 at the market’s peak. Become a subscriber and have all this great information at your disposal and support us in our work at the same time.

Our first year introductory prices will end on 12/31/08. However, for anyone on board before then, your annual rate will be locked in for as long as you wish to remain a subscriber. Current prices are $49 for one year or $89 for two years. The publication is also a great Christmas gift – give the gift of information that lasts the whole year! For more information, please visit The Centsible Investor webpage.

Big Bank vs. Big Car

Published on: 12/05/2008
Categories: Current Events, Economics
Comments: 2 Comments

In watching what could easily be considered a three-ring circus weren’t the implications so dire, the latest push for access to bailout billions has commenced. GM, Ford, and Chrysler executives piled into the most fuel efficient models in their fleet to begin a second pilgrimage to Washington DC. The move to hybrids which was somewhat humorous was brought on after Big Car execs were chastised by members of Congress for the use of private jets and also for a lack of candor about past mistakes. At stake, at least according to the execs, is the future of the US auto industry.

The tactic, at least on the surface, sounds awfully familiar. We were told just a little over two months ago that if a bank bailout plan wasn’t passed immediately that the entire financial system would implode. Sure we haven’t seen financial Armageddon yet, but you sure wouldn’t know it by looking at the retirement accounts of most Americans. Amazingly, $700 billion of bailout money and subsequent trillions in Federal Reserve loans found their way to Wall Street banks, but it seems like you’d have to travel pretty far to find a penny that hit Main Street.

Now we are assured that a Depression will ensue if Big Car is allowed to fail. While this is not the forum to nitpick over which failure would be more catastrophic, it would seem that given the relative importance of the productive base in a properly functioning economy that Big Car is infinitely more important than Big Bank. Congress, on the other hand, seems to feel the opposite.

So really, what gives? Inquiring minds want to know. It cannot be disputed that Big Car has done a thoroughly stupendous job of shooting itself in the foot. From the jobs bank to legacy costs to a complete and utter failure to interpret signals from their market niches, Big Car has been a textbook case of what not to do.

And in similar fashion, Big Bank has done essentially the same thing although they were considerably better at making money prior to D-Day. However, their implosion has been a completely spectacular failure on financial steroids thanks to the miracles of leverage. The ramifications have already been felt in every corner of the globe and keep in mind that this has been the case despite massive financial intervention by central banks on 6 continents. Iceland has already gone bankrupt with more countries likely to follow.

But perhaps most ironically, little has changed about the way Big Bank conducts business other than the nagging fact that they’re hoarding bailout dollars for themselves or buying US Treasuries while essentially choking off the real economy. Clearly, Big Bank wasn’t forced to put even an iota of thought into how they might reform, nor have they taken any meaningful action other than to layoff scads of ‘non-essential’ employees.

The real question at issue has nothing to do with how much Big Car is asking for, if they ever hope to pay it back, or what sort of business plan they have. It has to do with how Congress can get away with showing absolute contempt for an industry which is inextricably linked to the real economy and average Americans while giving what has amounted to a free pass to a banking system that produces nothing but trouble and rides upon the back of the US Economy like an $8 Trillion albatross. Add to that the absolute hypocrisy of our elected representatives who criticized Big Car CEO’s for the same transgressions they themselves commit each and every day. There used to be an old saying that you shouldn’t throw stones from a glass house. I would take this one step further and assert that Congress is using a flamethrower from within a house of cards.

The decision to either bailout Big Car or let it fail would be a pretty easy one if it weren’t for the three million manufacturing jobs that would be lost if these firms cease to exist. In addition, the loss of many millions more in related industries must also be considered. Unfortunately, given their current dire financial straits and an absolutely rotten economic outlook for the foreseeable future, Big Car may fail even with a bailout. Even the strongest of companies will be severely tested in the coming months and years. Those already in need of life support will likely need frequent and repeated cash infusions. So once again, we walk the slippery slope just a few short weeks after the last time. We talked about the bailout mentality in an early 2007 column. The financial rescue has already grown by a factor of 10 in the 9 weeks since its passage. Enough emphasis cannot be placed on the fact that this is only the beginning of the bailouts.

Perhaps Chrysler CEO Bob Nardelli, formerly of Home Depot has unknowingly helped coin the perfect slogan for the current dilemma: “We can do it – you’d better help.”

If you are interested on cutting edge analysis on the auto and financial sector bailouts and their many implications, go to Contrary Investor’s Café and listen to our weekly Internet radio segments ‘Spin Cycle’ and ‘Beat the Street’. This week, we discuss the trillions in bailout dollars, where they’re going, and the likely unpleasant consequences of these realities. We also tie in oil prices and the impact on the real economy. If you want to know where things are headed, these are episodes you cannot afford to miss. To listen, please visit: http://www.contraryinvestorscafe.com

« page 4 of 7 »

Welcome , today is Friday, 05/18/2012