Tags: bonds

Greece Slams Ratings Agencies After Moody’s Downgrade

LONDON (AP) — Greece launched a tirade against credit ratings agencies Monday after Moody’s downgraded its debt grade further below junk status, warning the bailed-out euro country might have to default on its massive borrowings.

The agency slashed its rating by three notches to B1 from Ba1 and warned it may cut again if the government’s commitment to austerity wanes or international creditors become less willing to support it – Greece was saved from bankruptcy last May after accepting a euro110 billion ($154 billion) bailout from the EU and the International Monetary Fund.

The Greek government’s response was quick and critical. It said Moody’s downgrade was “completely unjustified” and “does not reflect an objective and balanced assessment” of Greece’s actual economic prospects.

“Ultimately, Moody’s downgrading of Greece’s debt reveals more about the misaligned incentives and the lack of accountability of credit rating agencies than the genuine state or prospects of the Greek economy,” the finance ministry said.

It said the agencies – rivals Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings have also downgraded struggling countries like Greece heavily in past months – were trying to make up for failing to predict the financial crisis.

“Having completely missed the build-up of risk that led to the global financial crisis in 2008, the rating agencies are now competing with each other to be the first to identify risks that will lead to the next crisis,” the ministry said.

In explaining its downgrade, Moody’s warned the Greek government’s economic program may not yield the intended drop in debt and return to growth, and noted its considerable difficulties in raising revenues. It also highlighted the risk of tougher debt conditions when the bailout package ends in 2013.

“The risk of a post-2013 restructuring might lead the Greek authorities and investors to participate in a voluntary distressed exchange before that time,” Moody’s Investor Services said.

The Greek finance ministry queried the timing and the size of the downgrade, describing them as “incomprehensible” in the wake of the government’s success in cutting its budget deficit by 6 percentage points in 2010 to around 9 percent of the country’s national income. It has pledged to bring the deficit to the EU limit of 3 percent by 2014.

Despite the progress, Greek national debt is still expected to exceed 150 percent of GDP this year, while the economy is forecast to contract 3 percent.

The finance ministry said the reduction in the budget deficit was the “strongest evidence that relative to last year the risk of sovereign default has not increased but rather decreased as Greece is on a bold path towards fiscal consolidation.”

It said Moody’s failed to properly take into account the positive impact from the austerity measures and structural reforms.

“At a time when the global economy is fragile and market sentiment is sensitive, unbalanced and unjustified rating decisions such as Moody’s today can initiate damaging self-fulfilling prophecies and certainly strengthen the arguments for tighter regulation of the rating agencies themselves,” it added.

Credit ratings agencies have been blamed for failing to properly identify risks in the global economy ahead of the financial crisis, which led to the deepest recession since World War II and a crisis of confidence in bloated government finances, particularly in Europe.

Some experts argue the agencies have now gone too far the other way – playing it safe by being excessively pessimistic – and market regulators are planning reforms to better supervise them.

The EU has been one of the agencies’ most vocal critics and is looking at ways of reducing market reliance on their ratings, including greater competition among agencies and alternative ways to fund ratings.

On Monday, it played down the downgrade and insisted it would have no impact on its own view of Greece’s public finances, which are made regularly to verify the implementation of the international bailout deal.

“We have our own assessments of what is going on,” said Amelia Torres, spokeswoman of the EU Commission. “This is the assessment, as far as we are concerned, that you should look at and we don’t react to rating agency announcements.”

Standard & Poor’s and Fitch rate Greece slightly higher at BB+ though S&P has recently warned that it may lower its view soon.

Whether Greece ends up restructuring its debts – effectively reducing the amount it pays to creditors – could hinge on whether it can get the support of investors in bond markets.

Thanks to its bailout it doesn’t have to raise any substantial sums soon. However, Greece is trying to keep a presence in the markets and is due to auction euro1.25 billion worth of 26-week treasury bills Tuesday.

At the moment, it’s effectively blocked from issuing longer-term debt because of the exorbitantly high costs involved. The interest rates markets are charging Greece to lend money for ten years is over 12 percent, nearly 9 percentage points more than what Germany has to pay even though they share a currency.

Though it’s a national holiday in Greece, bonds were trading in international markets – the benchmark 10-year bond yield spiked 0.07 of a percentage point to 12.32 percent.

Traders Short Dollar as Crises Fail to Generate Appeal

Hedge funds and forex dealers are betting record amounts against the dollar, reflecting a growing belief that the US currency has lost its haven appeal and that eurozone interest rates will soon rise.

As the crisis in the Middle East has worsened, the latest exchange data show that traders are selling “short” the currency. The big US fiscal deficit and concerns about the effect of rising oil prices have been blamed by some for the dollar’s slide.

Figures from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, which are often used as a proxy for hedge fund activity, showed that short dollar positions surged from 200,564 contracts in the week ending February 22 to 281,088 on March 1.

This meant that the value of bets against the dollar on the CME rose $11.5bn in the week to March 1 to $39bn, $3bn more than the previous record of $36bn in 2007.

In contrast, speculators have added to their euro holdings amid expectations that the European Central Bank will soon raise interest rates to head off rising inflation.

Jean-Claude Trichet, ECB president, said last week that “strong vigilance” was warranted, a phrase used throughout the bank’s 2005-08 rate-tightening cycle to pave the way for a rate increase at the next governing council meeting. That strengthened the market view in financial markets that the ECB could raise rates at its April meeting and the euro last week rose to a four-month high of $1.3997 against the dollar, taking its gains from a 16-week low of $1.2871 in January to nearly 9 per cent.

“Dollar bears have become a marauding horde,” said David Watt, analyst at RBC Capital Markets. Given the continued losses for the dollar this month, he said it was likely that investors had since added to their bets against the US currency, short of an “absolutely stunning” reversal in sentiment.

“We may be seeing a turn in the longer-term outlook for the dollar – for the worse,” said Kit Juckes, head of FX strategy at Société Générale. He said the US Federal Reserve was likely to react more dovishly to a supply-side inflationary shock caused by rising oil prices than other central banks.

The figures showed that speculators on the CME had raised the value of their bets that the euro would rise against the dollar to $8.8bn, the largest since January 2008, in the week to March 1.

The data confirm the sharp turnround in sentiment towards the single currency from speculative investors, who as recently as January were betting on losses for the single currency on worries over the eurozone sovereign debt crisis.

Analysts said the prospect of ECB monetary tightening was outweighing investors’ concerns over the eurozone’s fiscal problems.

Indeed, since March 1, it is likely that speculators added to their long euro positions. Beat Siegenthaler, forex strategist at UBS, said further gains for the euro against the dollar were likely given that other investors, such as pension funds and asset managers, had not yet joined short-term, leveraged investors such as hedge funds in adjusting their bets against the single currency.

“Clearly some asset managers, presumably the more speculative in orientation, joined hedge funds in putting on long euro exposure, but on a longer view, asset managers remain significantly short and private clients have not even started to turn round their bearish euro positioning,” Mr Siegenthaler said.

He said an April interest rate rise from the ECB could therefore boost the single currency as these investors turned their positions round.

“For real money investors, the ECB decision could mean more euro buying over the medium term,” he said. “Longer-term positioning still looks short the euro.”

China Aims to Increase Currency’s Role in 2011

(Reuters) – China hopes to allow all exporters and importers to settle their cross-border trades in the yuan by this year, the central bank said on Wednesday, as part of plans to grow the currency’s international role.

In a statement on its website www.pbc.gov.cn, the central bank said it would respond to overseas demand for the yuan to be used as a reserve currency. It added it would also allow the yuan to flow back into China more easily. (Reporting by Zhou Xin and Koh Gui Qing; Editing by Ben Blanchard)

Fed’s Beige Book Points to ‘Inflation’

Editor’s Note: No kidding – the Fed creates inflation!

There are early signs that businesses can pass cost increases on to their customers, according to the Federal Reserve’s latest survey of its business contacts.

“Manufacturers in a number of Districts reported having greater ability to pass through higher input costs to customers,” the Fed said in its Beige Book survey, published on Wednesday.

If businesses can pass on higher costs it will increase the chance that the surge in oil prices turns into broader inflation. The Beige Book reports are another sign that inflation may have passed its trough.

However, the Federal Reserve does not rely on anecdotal reports, and will want to see hard data showing that companies are able to raise prices. The core consumer price index rose by only 1 per cent in January.

In the Philadelphia district, “output price increases are becoming more widespread throughout the manufacturing sectors”. In Richmond, “while most sellers were not passing through cost increases yet, many expected to begin raising prices later this year”.

But there were also downward pressures on inflation. “Wage pressures remained minimal across all Districts,” according to the Beige Book.

All 12 Federal Reserve districts said that their economies expanded in January and early February with only Chicago reporting a slower pace of growth.

It is the second consecutive report in which every part of the country has reported expansion and adds to evidence that the recovery has become more robust.

Retail sales rose in every district except Richmond and Atlanta. Tourism picked up in several districts, and every district except for St Louis “experienced solid growth in manufacturing production”.

Several districts said that January’s snowstorms had held back activity, with Dallas reporting “stressed crops and ranching conditions”, and Atlanta retailers saying that “adverse weather had affected the positive sales trend”.

Announced Layoffs Rise 20% from a Year Ago

March 2 (Bloomberg) — Employers in the U.S. announced more job cuts in February than in the same month last year, led by a surge at government agencies.

Planned firings increased 20 percent to 50,702 last month from February 2010, the first year-over-year gain since May 2009, according to a report today from Chicago-based Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc. Announcements at federal, state and local government offices almost tripled from last year.

“More job cuts at the federal level are expected in the months ahead as pressure mounts to cut costs and rein in the soaring national debt,” John A. Challenger, the outplacement company’s chief executive officer, said in a statement.

Dismissals of government workers may contribute to a slowdown in consumer spending, which accounts for 70 percent of the economy. Combined with the highest gasoline prices in two years, the threat of a pause in purchases may already be causing retailers, which had the second-biggest number of announcements last month, to pare payrolls, said Challenger.

“If gasoline tops $4 per gallon in the coming weeks, consumers may be forced to make significant changes to their spending habits,” said Challenger. “At this stage of the recovery, that could be an extremely damaging setback.”

Compared with last month, which saw the fewest firings for any January since record-keeping began in 1993, job-cut announcements climbed 32 percent. Because the figures aren’t adjusted for seasonal effects, economists prefer to focus on year-over-year changes rather than monthly numbers.

Government Firings

Government and non-profit agencies led the February job cuts with 16,380 announced reductions, according to Challenger. Retail firms had 8,360.

Michigan led all states with 6,381 announced job cuts, followed by the District of Columbia, with 5,946.

Today’s report also showed that employers announced plans in February to hire 72,581 workers, up from 29,492 the prior month. The surge reflects Home Depot Inc.’s announcement that it planned to add 60,000 temporary workers, Challenger said.

While touring an Intel Corp. semiconductor manufacturing facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, last month, President Barack Obama said the U.S. must foster a business climate that encourages job creation and assures companies can draw on an educated workforce.

“In a world that is more competitive than ever before, it’s our job to make sure that America is the best place on earth to do business,” Obama said Feb. 18 at the factory.

Hiring Plans

Intel, the world’s largest chipmaker, announced plans during Obama’s visit to build a $5 billion microprocessor plant in Arizona and hire 4,000 employees in the U.S. this year.

Employers hired 193,000 workers in February, and the unemployment rate rose to 9.1 percent, according to the median estimate of economists in a Bloomberg News survey ahead of a March 4 employment report from the Labor Department.

Challenger’s data do not always correlate with figures on payrolls or first-time jobless claims as reported by the government. Many job cuts are carried out through attrition or early retirement. Some employees whose jobs are eliminated find work elsewhere in their companies and many announced staff reductions never take place because business improves. The totals also include foreign affiliates.

Just When You Thought It Was Safe (To Buy EuroBonds)

Portugal is under increasing pressure to take a bail-out as its borrowing costs have stayed above a level widely considered unsustainable for longer than Greece and Ireland before their rescues last year.

Portugal’s benchmark market interest rates were above 7 per cent for the 16th consecutive trading day on Friday, closing at 7.55 per cent. Greece and Ireland, the two eurozone countries to seek bail-outs so far, lasted 13 and 15 trading days respectively with bond yields of more than 7 per cent.

“They are going to need some kind of support. You can’t magic this debt away,” said Gary Jenkins, head of fixed income at Evolution Securities.

Few expect Portugal to seek a bail-out before a European Union summit next month to discuss whether any reform of the eurozone’s bail-out mechanisms is necessary.

A growing number of opposition politicians in Portugal have joined international investors and economists in saying a bail-out now seems unavoidable.

“We’re walking a financial tightrope every day,” said Luís Marques Mendes, a former leader of the centre-right Social Democrats (PSD), the main opposition party. “A request for a financial rescue within three or four weeks is inevitable.”

Paulo Rangel, an MEP and senior PSD official, said: “I’m convinced an external intervention will be necessary.”

However, the minority Socialist government is maintaining its defiant stance that Portugal has no need of a bail-out and can continue to finance its debt in the market. Fernando Teixeira dos Santos, finance minister, says the implied interest rate of its debt is only 3.6 per cent on average, compared with a European Union average of about 3.5 per cent. He stresses that Portugal has raised about a third of the €20bn ($27.5bn) it needs this year with demand remaining relatively firm, “despite all the noise”.

Investors are nervously eyeing the fate of Portugal less because of its importance as a market and more for its potential to act as a firebreak to stop the eurozone debt crisis spreading to Spain, one of Europe’s biggest economies and judged next in line. “I don’t really care about Portugal but I do care about Spain,” said one of Europe’s largest bond investors. “Protecting it has to be a key priority.”

Mr Jenkins said Portugal was different from Greece and Ireland in that its refinancing needs in the next two years were relatively modest but he expected some support to be given it from the EU in the coming weeks.

Lisbon has not issued any long-term bonds since yields surged after a €3.5bn syndicated sale on February 7. Analysts do not expect it to schedule any five- or 10-year debt auctions until after the March EU summit.

Lisbon has blamed “delays and hesitations” by eurozone leaders for affecting market sentiment towards its debt.

Portugal has scheduled a sale of short-term Treasury bills on Wednesday together with a second buy-back auction for outstanding government bonds.

Libyan Oil Production to be Shut Down?

Editor’s Note: These guys oughta know I guess. Banks have been on both sides of every major global crisis for at least the last hundred years.

“We expect Libyan production to be shut down completely and we might lose sweet crudes from Libya for a prolonged period of time,” Bank of America Merrill Lynch analyst Sabine Schels told Reuters.

Schels said that the world faced the prospect of real supply shock in which the loss of 1.6 million barrels per day of sweet oil could potentially trigger a steep rise in prices and force a sharp reduction in demand to balance the system.

“Some of the supply can be replaced with Saudi light crude and some from SPR, but if the disruption is prolonged, we will need demand to drop to balance the system,” Schels said.

The bank is currently discussing scenarios and outlooks, and will publish a report on its findings in the coming days.

“We already faced a demand shock last year with global demand increasing by 2.8 million bpd and on top of that, what we have now is a real supply shock,” Schels said.

“In a price shock scenario whereby we lose 1.6 million bpd, the rise in prices can be a lot greater than in the case of a demand shock. (Reporting by Jessica Donati; editing by Marguerita Choy)

The Recovery That Never Was

It is my belief that as the headlines continue to roll in about fiscal woes from sea to shining sea that we are going to get a full appreciation for the fraud that has been perpetrated on the American people in the form of the ‘economic recovery’ that the media has been stumping for since the middle of 2009. This ‘wag the dog’ type undertaking has been about confidence, perceptions, and little else. Absolutely, there are pockets of the nation where people have found work. After all, when your government dumps nearly a trillion dollars into the economy it is going to have SOME effect. Our goal from the beginning of these hyperstimulation maneuvers was to point out the unsustainability of this course of action and more importantly to predict the consequences thereof.

Is .4% really that big of a deal?

This morning, the Commerce Department revised its GDP estimate for the fourth quarter of 2010 by .4% to the downside. That in and of itself is certainly not newsworthy, but the reasons given for the downward revision most certainly are. For the first time in quite a while, the government and the media are actually allowing the light of truth to shine into government reporting. One of the biggest reasons (which has been included in many headlines) is that cuts in state government spending are largely responsible for the cut in GDP. So what, that is common sense isn’t it? It will be, but let’s analyze. I’ve talked many times about how GDP numbers have been overstated because they included government spending that comes from borrowed money. While those discussions generally focused on the federal government, this includes the states too. The states issue debt in the form of general obligation and specific bonds to do much of their spending since they, like the federal government, are largely insolvent. This spent borrowed money counts in GDP the same as a dollar spent that had been kept in savings. The thesis proposed months ago was a simple one; the states are going into extremis and when they do, down goes GDP. Double that for the federal government.

This is one of the biggest reasons that no one in Washington really wants to cut government spending, putting the rhetoric aside. They all know that if they were to cut a trillion dollars from the federal budget that GDP would fall by around 1/14th and we’d have an instant depression. Yet at the same time, a trillion dollar cut in spending is exactly what needs to happen along with a bevy of program reforms; and that is just for starters. Hopefully this gives you a better appreciation of the predicament we’re in as a nation. This is one of the reasons I think politicians are taking up the stance that they agree cuts need to be made, but can’t agree on which ones. This will give them all political cover to maintain the status quo thereby cutting essentially nothing, while making much in the way of fanfare over insignificant token cuts. The idea of shutting down the government and its massive entitlement system has already been floated to scare people into pressuring their leaders into maintaining the status quo. Stay tuned; it gets better.

Chaste Consumers?

Consumers also did not escape blame for the lack of more vigorous ‘growth’. Spending had originally been thought to have increased at a 4.4% annualized rate. It turns out spending likely only increased at 4.1%. Bad consumers! From our good friend Jeannine at AP:

“Consumers spent a little less than first thought. Their spending rose at a rate of 4.1 percent, slightly smaller than the initial estimate of 4.4 percent. Still, it was the best showing since 2006. And it suggests Americans will play a larger role this year in helping the economy grow, especially with more money from a Social Security tax cut.”

Talk about opinion shaping. This should be another indicator that nobody is really intent on fixing anything. While I am all in favor of a tax cut, one without reform seems rather obtuse, especially given the fact that Social Security is already in the red and busted out beyond description in terms of its unfunded promises. The program needs a massive overhaul, not insipid palliatives.

What cannot be left alone in the above press line is the suggestion that consumers are going to lift the economy in such a Herculean manner. First of all, let’s get it straight that much of the ‘gain’ in consumer spending (as measured by retail sales) came from the fact that consumers are paying more for food and gasoline and, sadly, have increased their debt burdens slightly to do so. More unsustainability.

To demonstrate this, I’ll show a couple of charts; the first is the slight, but significant increase in consumer credit followed by the steady increases in both food and energy prices throughout all of 2010:

Consumer Credit Outstanding

Now let’s get a better idea of where at least a portion of those borrowed dollars went – first food and beverage prices:

Food Price Increases

Now, for energy…

Consumers paying more for staple goods doesn’t constitute economic growth, yet this is exactly what the Keynesian deficit-lovers would have you believe. And we know the CPI is in most cases grossly understating the real increases, but at least you now have a visualization of the issue. It may very well be that this next boom in consumer indebtedness comes more from necessity rather than greed and avarice. With the labor market still incredibly soft, and thousands of discouraged workers falling out of the BLS counts each month, the credit card is the only place many people will be able to fill the gap.

Further anecdotal evidence that supports the notion that this ‘recovery’ was nearly entirely a contrived event (thanks to borrowed government money and increasing prices of finished goods) is the housing market. Home prices have continued to drop despite the frantic calls of ‘bottom’ from market analysts, hopeful professional associations like NAR, and the mainstream press. Foreclosures continue to mount and even CNBC got on the bandwagon a few weeks back reporting that around 11% of all homes in the US are now sitting empty. A genuine bottom up fix would have corrected many of these problems. Spending a trillion dollars to rebuild our manufacturing base would have created jobs beyond those necessary to do the building. It would have employed people on an ongoing basis, miraculously converting bad debts into good ones. Instead we chose to do a top-down fix, lavishing trillions of dollars on banks, brokerages, and lobbyists in the hope that a few bucks might find their way to Joe Q. Public. It reeks of too much textbook and too little practicality.

The recovery that never was is over. Continuation of the current state of affairs will result in further debt accumulation by a system that is ready to disintegrate on its own weight. Assuming the consumer can step in and spend up where even state governments leave off is an absurd idea. Assuming they can fill the black hole left by a gutted and fiscally impotent federal government is laughable.

Freddie Mac Continues to Lose Money

Published on: 02/24/2011
Categories: Current Events, Economics
Comments: 1 Comment

Government-controlled mortgage buyer Freddie Mac managed a narrower loss of $1.7 billion for the October-December quarter of last year. But it has asked for an additional $500 million in federal aid – up from the $100 million it sought in the previous quarter.

Freddie Mac also posted a $19.8 billion loss for all of 2010. The government rescued Freddie Mac and sibling company Fannie Mae in September 2008 to cover their losses on soured mortgage loans. It estimates the bailouts will cost taxpayers as much as $259 billion. Freddie Mac’s October-December loss attributable to common stockholders works out to 53 cents a share. It takes into account $1.6 billion in dividend payments to the government. It compares with a loss of $7.8 billion, or $2.39 a share, in the fourth quarter of 2009. The company said the recovery of the housing market is still fragile.

“As we begin 2011, the housing recovering remains vulnerable to high levels of unemployment, delinquencies and foreclosures,” Chief Executive Charles Haldeman said in a statement. “We expect national home prices to decline this year as housing will continue to take some time to recover.” Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own or guarantee about half of all mortgages in the U.S., or nearly 31 million home loans worth more than $5 trillion. Along with other federal agencies, they played some part in almost 90 percent of new mortgages over the past year. Fannie and Freddie buy home loans from banks and other lenders, package them into bonds with a guarantee against default and sell them to investors around the world. The government’s estimated cost of bailing out the mortgage giants far exceeds the $132.3 billion they have received from taxpayers so far.

That would make theirs the costliest bailout of the financial crisis. The two have been hit by massive losses on risky mortgages purchased from 2005 through 2008. The companies have tightened their lending standards after those loans started to go bad. Default rates on new loans are far lower. The Obama administration unveiled a plan earlier this month to slowly dissolve the two mortgage giants. The aim is to shrink the government’s role in the mortgage system. The proposal would remake decades of federal policy aimed at getting Americans to buy homes and probably would make home loans more expensive. Exactly how far the government’s role in mortgages would be reduced was left to Congress to decide. But all three options the administration presented would create a housing finance system that relies far more on private money. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will face questions from lawmakers next week at a congressional hearing on the proposal.

The Libyan Plot Thickens?

There’s been virtually no reliable information coming out of Tripoli, but a source close to the Gaddafi regime I did manage to get hold of told me the already terrible situation in Libya will get much worse. Among other things, Gaddafi has ordered security services to start sabotaging oil facilities. They will start by blowing up several oil pipelines, cutting off flow to Mediterranean ports. The sabotage, according to the insider, is meant to serve as a message to Libya’s rebellious tribes: It’s either me or chaos.

Two weeks ago this same man had told me the uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt would never touch Libya. Gaddafi, he said, had a tight lock on all of the major tribes, the same ones that have kept him in power for the past 41 years. The man of course turned out to be wrong, and everything he now has to say about Gaddafi’s intentions needs to be taken in that context. (See TIME’s exclusive interview with Gaddafi.)

The source went on and told me that Gaddafi’s desperation has a lot to with the fact that he now can only count on the loyalty of his tribe, the Qadhadhfa. And as for the army, as of Monday he only has the loyalty of approximately 5,000 troops. They are his elite forces, the officers all handpicked. Among them is the unit commanded by his second youngest son Khamis, the 32nd Brigade. (The total strength of the regular Libyan army is 45,000.)

My Libyan source said that Gaddafi has told people around him that he knows he cannot retake Libya with the forces he has. But what he can do is make the rebellious tribes and army officers regret their disloyalty, turning Libya into another Somalia. “I have the money and arms to fight for a long time,” Gaddafi reportedly said. (See TIME’s special report “The Middle East in Revolt.”)

As part of the same plan to turn the tables, Gaddafi ordered the release from prison of the country’s Islamic militant prisoners, hoping they will act on their own to sow chaos across Libya. Gaddafi envisages them attacking foreigners and rebellious tribes. Couple that with a shortage of food supplies, and any chance for the rebels to replace Gaddafi will be remote.

My Libyan source said that in order to understand Gaddafi’s state of mind we need to understand that he feels deeply betrayed by the media, which he blames for sparking the revolt. In particular, he blames the Qatari TV station al-Jazeera, and is convinced it targeted him for purely political motivations. He also feels betrayed by the West because it has only encouraged the revolt. Over the weekend, he warned several European embassies that if he falls, the consequence will be a flood of African immigration that will “swamp” Europe. (Comment on this story.)

Pressed, my Libyan source acknowledged Gaddafi is a desperate, irrational man, and his threats to turn Libya into another Somalia at this point may be mostly bluffing. On the other hand, if Gaddafi in fact enjoys the loyalty of troops he thinks he has, he very well could take Libya to the brink of civil war, if not over.

« page 4 of 12 »

Welcome , today is Friday, 05/18/2012