Categories: My Two Cents

A Permanent Crisis – By Andy Sutton

As the financial world breathed a collective sigh of relief as the Greek Parliament voted to impose further austerity measures on the people of Greece, I wondered aloud to no one in particular how many times we’d have to see this movie before people finally realize that this crisis is a permanent one. There are many analogies that we could use to illustrate what has gone on, but probably the best is a trauma patient coming into the hospital with a severed carotid artery. Instead of performing surgery and repairing the wound, doctors throw the unlucky fellow on a gurney with a piece of gauze taped over the incision. Every so often they check back in, throw another piece of gauze on it and walk out, never fixing the problem. That is precisely what is going on with regards to the Eurozone mess. And America’s too. Lots of tape and gauze with precious little in the way of real solutions has been the norm for quite some time now and there is no reason to think that this will change unless it is out of dire necessity.

In my opinion, there are (at least) three overriding macro themes that are driving this crisis, and will continue to do so. Like most other recent economic and financial dislocations, it will go until it doesn’t. Looking at the macro drivers below, it is easy to see why this is the case: old habits die hard and most importantly, this crisis, along with most others, is insanely profitable for a select few.

The Psycho-Moral Problem

When you really tear away at all the media glitz and veneer applied to the global debt mess, you can find several underlying causes. The first is greed. The second, and this one has been a rather recent development, is laziness. I often wonder if America would be able to undergo another industrial revolution similar to the first one in today’s world. I seriously doubt it. We seem to be good at building shopping malls and restaurants, then borrowing money to patronize these establishments. In the aggregate though, we really haven’t built much in the way of productive capacity in a generation, let alone manned and operated it. Do we even remember how? What is really coming to the forefront is that we are by no means alone in this suspiciously insane endeavor; the people of Europe have been doing a mighty fine job of living beyond their means as well. Europe has had its own ‘great society’ upheaval similar to America’s turn down the wrong path in the 1960′s.

This drive to create a social utopia, or in economic terms, a post-scarcity world, has created exactly that which it was supposed to avoid – long-term scarcity. Why did these attempts occur? Gross misunderstandings of economics? Many think so, but when you read the articles, papers, and other correspondence written by many of the players in these movements it becomes rather clear that they were interested more in power accumulation than anything else. And two continents got wrapped up into it to the point where we have no idea how to live without it. Here in the US, over half of the population receives some type of transfer payment from the government. For the purposes of this article, I am not making the distinction between people who paid into programs like social security and Medicare and those who didn’t. The point is governments have become little more than a very expensive conduit between the ‘working’ class and those who are collecting from them. And, it has been this way so long that people cannot fathom a world that is any different. When they are confronted with drastic change, well, you saw what happened in Athens – and is still going on despite the fact that the media has moved on to more pressing and important matters such as Nancy Grace’s newfound popularity.

The bottom line is that the Eurozone and America both need a massive attitude adjustment. 2008 didn’t even put a dent in the entitlement mentality in either locale. Imagine what it will take to change our way of thinking.

Rating Agency Competitive Downgrades

The final two bullet points likely fall under the broad category of financial and economic cannibalism. For years now, I’ve marveled both publicly and privately about the willingness of the major credit rating agencies to maintain the sterling debt rating of the USGovt despite a growing fiscal morass that is now only first being truly recognized. Let’s make the assumption that the people who run these agencies are not illiterate and actually know what is going on. Unfortunately, this logic has proven to be spot on as is evidenced by the constant beatings applied to Eurozone countries by the majors (S&P / Moody’s).

2010 Sovereign Ratings

This strategy of competitive downgrades serves to exacerbate the debt issue at its core, pretty much guaranteeing that none of these countries will ever clear their debts. Of course that is the whole point. The current action dovetails rather well with John Perkins’ assertions in “Confessions of an Economic Hitman.” Keep in mind also that while all these downgrades on PIIGS sovereign debt have taken place, the USGovt has received only ‘stern’ warnings regarding its own fiscal black hole. Clearly Moody’s and S&P are in the business of protecting the status quo. We saw the depths of rating agency fraud beginning in the early part of 2008 when highly rated mortgage tranches suddenly came up lame. We will see this again, this time in USGovt Treasury bonds. The status quo will be protected, even if a company or two takes a dive in the process. Think Lehman Brothers.

2011 Sovereign Ratings

Outrage from the Eurozone has intensified, particularly with yesterday’s severe downgrading of Portugal’s debt by Moody’s. The cut came as a newly elected government had just pushed through an ambitious austerity program. In the past year, Portugal has been cut from Aa2 (two steps below the rating of the USGovt) to Ba2, which is below investment grade and otherwise known as ‘junk’. This has all transpired despite the fact that Portugal has at least been trying to get its house in order. Meanwhile, Washington does zilch and maintains a top rating? These strategic hits on countries that are totally at the whim of the IMF and/or regional central banks reek of foul play. Calls for ‘more responsible behavior’ by Eurozone officials should be replaced with investigations into the ratings agencies themselves, given their duplicitous actions (and lack of action in some cases) regarding credit ratings.

It is also probably a reasonable assumption that both major ratings agencies and the raft of second-tier firms knew going in what was going to happen regarding the Eurozone. Much of the fallout follows the tenets of common sense. The endless bailouts are no different than our own broken system. Whether or not these bailouts are covered by the media is of no consequence. They’ve been going on for years and will continue to go on. The point is, shouldn’t the ratings have gone down sooner? There will be those that will argue that cutting ratings in 2008 or sooner would have precipitated the crisis in and of itself. This is probably precisely why the balloon hasn’t gone up yet on America’s bond ratings. However, it would appear that the ratings have been cut strategically to allow financial entities to game the system, hence my earlier comments regarding financial and economic cannibalism.

Foreign bank exposure to Eurozone debt

Similar to the yield curve, there is a ratings curve in the Eurozone, which creates a multitude of opportunities for trading profits. This goes back to the cardinal rule of large firm investing a la Jim Cramer: when there is no volatility, create some. And if you put a few countries into IMF receivership along the way, well that is just a cost of doing business, right?

Hedge Fund Bets

This probably qualifies as a corollary to my earlier point about parties gaming the system, but I think we need to expound on this just a little bit. My entire point here is that once again, the biggies are playing with fire. And they will get burned. Not maybe. Obviously there are no guarantees in life, but I’d say this one ranks up there with the sun coming up. It is going to happen. This is a continuing testimony to the greed involved in our society and financial system and precisely why I lobbied hard and spoke out against any bailouts in 2008. These people needed to go bankrupt. Instead they were allowed to compromise the financial system and with it, the economy. With the wounds barely healed, if they’ve healed at all, these same folks are right back at it again.

True to form, George Soros has had plenty to say about the Eurozone mess. Remember, he is the same fellow that said ‘I’m having a good crisis’ in 2009 while people were losing homes, jobs, and retirement savings. He added that it was the culmination of his life’s work. Oddly enough, the Daily Mail, which originally posted the story, has since pulled the offensive comments. He said recently,

“We are on the verge of an economic collapse which starts, let’s say, in Greece, but it could easily spread,” billionaire investor George Soros said during a panel discussion in Vienna on June 26. “The financial system remains extremely vulnerable.”

The fact that the self-appointed master of the currency raid has pointed out the fragility of the financial system foreshadows directly to the near certainty that there will in fact be another crisis. Again to my earlier point, it is insanely profitable for a select few. Hedge funds are firmly betting on the extension of the Greek tragedy to the rest of the Eurozone, and some are even betting on the metastasis of the problem across the Atlantic as well.

The major point to understand here is that there is no way to even quantify the risks associated with getting in on the sovereign debt mess. If you had 192 or so standalone countries, each with its own central bank like we used to have, it would be difficult enough just because of the propensity of banks and other financial actors to invest across borders. The idea of the regional currency and central bank was to curtail the risk inherent to the system, but instead, it has done the exact opposite because now there are so many actors gaming the system simultaneously. The idea of having a bunch of Dick Fulds operating on the razor’s edge with the global financial system on the line is a scary proposition. Sooner or later, someone is going to make a mistake and that is going to be it.

Once again, it will come down to the derivatives taking the paper empire to the woodshed. It isn’t even so much the millstone of the hundreds of billions in Eurozone debt that is spread all over the globe. There are bets on that debt, default swaps, options, and a full array of side bets on the debt itself, then bets on the side bets themselves and so on out to the 4th or 5th degree in many cases. The derivative issue was never even really addressed. It was the 800-pound elephant in 2008 and it is still standing there. Why? Because it is insanely profitable for a select few. Which comes back to my original point: we have a true moral crisis at the root of our economic and financial woes. None of the symptoms can be fixed until we get at the real causes and human nature is a tough nut to crack. See why I’m such a pessimist?

We have released a new complimentary report entitled “If You Have Paper Assets.. There are Three Things you MUST Consider”. It is a 10-page report that identifies some logical approaches you can take with regards to your paper investments if you’re one of the many people that still needs them to generate cash flow and income. Bear in mind this is in no way meant to supplant our firm position that each investor needs to have a sizable portion of their portfolio in physical precious metals, however, but is meant to augment the non-metals portion of your overall strategy. The report is available by clicking here.

The War Over Money – My Two Cents

Once again, S&P is at it, issuing its monthly threat to the USGovt to fall into compliance or risk its AAA credit rating. On the surface, these warnings have become rather laughable in that the ratings agency feels the need to say something while, in effect, saying nothing. As time has gone by, the idea that the markets would be jittered by an actual ratings cut has become equally absurd. To hear it reported, you’d think the market consisted of a bunch of first graders who need S&P, Moody’s or Fitch to tell them the sky is blue.

To the average American, the threat comes not from what the ratings agencies might do, but what is being done (or not done) to cause the entire flap to begin with. The only real difference between the US and the PIIGS or anyone else is that we have a standing contract with the moneychangers to provide as much liquidity as is necessary to achieve whatever goals are desirable; not to America, but to the moneychangers themselves. It is a subtle distinction, but one that I notice way too many people who understand things are tripping over. We can’t talk about debt without talking about the Fed and we can’t have a reasonable discussion about the Fed without examining its motives. We have to mention that your local bank gets paid a 6% per annum dividend from the fed for its mandatory participation in the system, among many other things you won’t hear on television.

Obviously one of the ways dollar holders the world over have sought to fight back is through the ownership of precious metals. They are the anathema of fiat currencies. They cannot be forged, printed, or created as computer digits in their physical form. This is nothing new; there has been a secular bull market in metals for over a decade now while the dollar has faded from a desired asset into a ‘necessary evil’ as the world speeds headlong into the clutches of regional and perhaps even global currency regimes.

The moneychangers tolerated the bull market in precious metals for a time as even they recognize the value of real money. Central banks went from being net sellers of gold to net buyers several years ago and have been accumulating. The story of Asian demand, largely unspoken of in the USFinPress has been quietly driving the markets even higher. For US investors, precious metals became a bright spot considering the equity markets have lost around 20% when adjusted for the government’s overly modest inflation figures in the past 10 years. The inflation cat escaped the bag in 2006 and 2007. The Fed then cemented the truth that inflation is a monetary event by its quantitative easing actions. The subsequent rises in virtually every tangible asset since have created a clear causal relationship between monetary action and price formation that even the most stalwart of Keynesians will have an impossible task refuting. Finally, US investors had something that they could rely on to provide protection against inflation. They’d lost the ability to do so with traditional bank CDs, money market funds, and sweep programs. It is only fitting that the moneychangers now try to change the rules they themselves established. And it is even more fitting that they waited until so late in the game to do so. The attacks are subtle to the point that the average metals investor might not understand the implications, but there is a war going on over money itself.

The Attack on Precious Metals

The first of these two attacks has had a profound effect on metals investors, and at the same time created a massive opportunity through the resultant market dislocation. The attack plan all along by the banking cartel has been to discredit gold and silver as monetary instruments while at the same time accumulating large amounts of both. This rush to tangibles has left warehouses with increasingly smaller amounts of metal to work with, particularly silver (see graphic). Wonder of all wonders, people were stepping up to the plate, motivated by people like Jim Sinclair among others, and taking delivery of metals instead of playing in the paper metals markets. People have begun to understand how the ETFs and many other ‘paper gold’ instruments are merely tools of metals manipulators.

COMEX inventory

When silver closed within a whisker of $50 an ounce back in early May, CME took to action by hiking the margin maintenance requirements on silver contracts. Without going into the sordid details, in essence it made it more expensive to hold silver contracts in that the contract holder had to put up more capital. The stated reason behind this action was to limit ‘speculation’ in that particular market. The action followed the traditional mantra of the manipulators – anytime metals prices increase it is because of speculation and when they fall it is because of fundamentals. This is a losing battle that has cost the megabanks untold sums of fiat cash to fight, but the supply of currency is unlimited. CME has hiked margin requirements 6 times between late March and early May, beating silver down from the high $40s to the mid $30s. Gold has been affected as well, albeit to a much lesser extent on a percentage basis. The more recent of these hikes have been on gold contracts as well as silver.

CME Silver Margin Hikes

The second attack has come out recently in emails to customers of some online futures brokers who are interpreting the new financial ‘reform’ bill to inhibit the OTC sale of gold and silver on a leveraged basis. Without delving into the legalese, it will become essentially impossible, starting July 15, to buy or sell spot gold or silver in almost all cases. Many have asked if this is going to affect coin and physical sales, and there has been no indication that this is the case at all; it pertains to leveraged or margined transactions only. So far.

Again, the stated purpose of these actions in the aggregate is to curb ‘speculators’. Obviously we could split hairs on the semantics of such a statement since pretty much anyone who makes any type of investment is a speculator in that they are making an allocation in the hope (not guarantee) that they will profit from it. Oddly enough, in all this talk of speculators nobody bothered to mention the major banks that are routinely short millions of ounces of silver in the paper markets. Apparently they are not speculators, nor are they engaged in rather poorly disguised attempts at market manipulation. Those types of activities would quickly be sniffed out and stomped by Congress and our ever-vigilant regulators. Wouldn’t they?

It is pretty clear what is going on here. The cartel is losing its metal (and its mettle) and is attempting to flush out those contract holders who are most likely to take delivery – the marginal investors who buy futures contracts then remove the metal from the exchanges. Also obvious is the hope is that the increased margin reqs will drive them out. It will not bother the JPMorgans or the HSBCs in the least. If nothing else, these actions reek of desperation and are indicative of the fact that the physical, buy-and-hold crowd is substantial, is here to stay, and is in fact winning the war. Keep it up folks, congratulations on a job well done.

A New Mission

A sabbatical is usually a good thing as it gives a nice opportunity to take a step back, assess, reassess, and potentially relax. I’ve enjoyed the past few months away as I took time to do the above and also to try to impart a little common sense and perhaps some wisdom on the up and coming generation regarding economics, the study thereof, and more importantly, the dire consequences of failing to recognize and follow basic economic laws.  So I return, and in many ways, things are not much different than when I took leave back in February. There have been some recurring themes, and in a sad way, it is nice to have been right about so many things, particularly the fraudulent nature of the recovery that was pronounced by the govermedia back in early 2009. Believe me though, for all the people who have had their jobs outsourced, offshored, or eliminated, I’d have much rather been wrong. The same goes for those who are now struggling to support families on a fraction of their prior earnings. I would much rather have had to slink away in disgrace because of a voracious (and healthy) economic recovery than see the suffering endured by so many.

I remember vividly a conversation I had with author Jim Kunstler a few years ago about these matters and we hammered on the need for people to scale down. Sure, we were having that conversation through the lens of the reality of peak oil, but it really applied in the financial sense as well. Perhaps the reality that has struck me the most over the past few weeks is the impact that McDonalds is able to have on the labor market. Who would have ever thought that a fast-food joint would be responsible for half the jobs created in a single month? And that is if you have any reason at all to believe the BLS jobs numbers. I don’t. But that is another story that has been told many times before and we’ll not do it again.

Getting back to my conversation with Kunstler, we talked about the mental paradigm shift necessary to deal with peak oil. The days of the hour-long commute are limited. Driving more than 100 miles a day is going to be a thing of the past soon. Many are now telecommuting a couple of days a week in jobs where that is suitable and that helps. Gas prices were much lower when Jim and I talked than they are now, that is for sure. For the guy who drives 100 miles each day to work, his commuting bill has gone up dramatically while his wages have stagnated. He is pummeled again at the grocery store with increasing prices for quality and quantity of foods that are continuously decreasing. The media and government are doing Joe America a huge disservice by making it sound like these situations are transient in nature, rather than here for the long term. Again, the point of this commentary is not to flesh out the reasons behind what is going on; that’s already been done. The point is that people need to adjust and most simply won’t. It isn’t that they can’t; they just refuse.

Our entitlement society is heading for a brick wall. The major underpinnings of our gimme society are insolvent. Our debt is skyrocketing. Our bonds are junk. Our currency is a joke. Our ‘free’ press is in the pockets of the same people who have brought all of this economic despair to Main Street. Joe America nearly shut down this corrupt system in 2008-09 simply by curtailing his expansion of borrowing. Nobody wants to talk about that. The proof is irrefutable and the connections are clear. America stops borrowing and the fiat system is dead on arrival at the Fed’s triage center: the FOMC. We hear dire warnings about the government’s debt and the statutory debt limit. Threats are made, promises of doomsday echo from the same ratings agencies who saw fit to apply AAA ratings to junk mortgage bonds and will mercilessly downgrade the PIIGS for problems that are several orders of magnitude less than what we face.

Joe America is largely unfazed, however. Sure, there are pockets of hurt, and there are many, many people who have re-evaluated their personal situations and have embraced individual austerity. Yet in the aggregate, we’re back on the credit card. It is hard to discern at this point whether the uptick in borrowing is for essentials or discretionary goods. Based on the anecdotal evidence, it is likely both. People have been trained to borrow, make minimum payments, and to live as a servant to the creditor. When you think about it, the ‘money’ that has been used to create this servitude has been created from nothing, yet must be repaid with something very real – the sweat of one’s brow. Hardly seems like a fair deal to me, yet we not only accept it, we demand it. Have we really spent any time thinking about these matters? It is almost funny when I look at the latest opinion polls regarding the national debt. The vast majority of Americans think that Congress needs to put the country’s fiscal house in order, yet most of those same people refuse to do it in their own backyard.

Yes, America is in dire need of a mental paradigm shift towards a simpler life, with less emphasis on accumulation of toys and materialism and more of an emphasis on stewardship and restoring the economic environment that allowed this country to become what it was. That should be our mandate. However, I am a realist and I know deep down that most will not heed this or any other call for a change of thinking. Unfortunately, history is firmly on the side of this pessimistic disposition. I have decided in my time off to focus at the micro level instead of the macro level. My days of open letters to Congress and calls to economic action are over. My days of open letters to individuals have begun. These commentaries and my firm’s newsletter will be geared more towards helping individuals who recognize our changing world to adjust, cope, and prepare for what is inevitable rather than attempting to convince those who will continue to deny the obvious until the time for meaningful action has long passed.

These words are not meant to be harsh, but have come over months of reflection as I’ve had some time to ruminate over the human condition and its predilection to lemming-like behavior. The one silver lining in all this is that if people live more responsibly and in a simpler manner from a financial perspective, they will be taking many of the steps that will be necessary for the preparation of the effects of peak oil. Yes, peak oil is real. Even the big banks are now talking about ‘resource constraints’ in the energy space and figuring it into their forecasts. Oil companies are hammering like crazy in the Marcellus shales to bring natural gas to market that hasn’t sold for over $5.50 a thousand in what seems to be a dog’s life.

If you are one of those people who understand these matters, then this column and anything else I can do to help are here for you to utilize. From here forward this work will be dedicated to the awakened rather than to the process of awakening. If you’re not there yet, there are plenty of mainstream media outlets that will gladly satiate your desire for information.

This month’s Centsible Investor Keynote will focus on the debt ceiling, government debt in general, and most importantly, some steps you can take on an individual basis to assist you in mitigating the effects of continued runaway borrowing. In addition, we’ll provide our traditional analysis of energy, precious metals, and the major financial markets. For more information, click here.

Walmart’s Core Shoppers ‘Running Out of Money’

Editor’s Note: But the media pundits, government and bankers all say the economy is good. We are beginning to see just the leading edge of the complete bifurcation of the USEconomy: into the haves (about 5%) and the have nots (95%). Think you’ll end up in the 5%? Think again.

Wal-Mart’s core shoppers are running out of money much faster than a year ago due to rising gasoline prices, and the retail giant is worried, CEO Mike Duke said Wednesday.

“We’re seeing core consumers under a lot of pressure,” Duke said at an event in New York. “There’s no doubt that rising fuel prices are having an impact.”

Wal-Mart shoppers, many of whom live paycheck to paycheck, typically shop in bulk at the beginning of the month when their paychecks come in.

Lately, they’re “running out of money” at a faster clip, he said.

“Purchases are really dropping off by the end of the month even more than last year,” Duke said. “This end-of-month [purchases] cycle is growing to be a concern.

Wal-Mart (WMT, Fortune 500), which averages 140 million shoppers weekly to its stores in the United States, is considered a barometer of the health of the consumer and the economy.

To that end, Duke said he’s not seeing signs of a recovery yet.

With food prices rising, Duke said Wal-Mart is charging customers more for some fresh groceries while reducing prices on other merchandise such as electronics.

Wal-Mart has struggled with seven straight quarters of sales declines in its stores.

Addressing that challenge, Duke said the company made mistakes by shrinking product variety and not being more aggressive on prices compared to its competitors.

“What’s made Wal-Mart great over the decades is ‘every day low prices’ and our [product] assortment,” he said. “We got away from it.”

Now, with its strategy of low prices all the time back in place, Duke said making Wal-Mart a “one-stop shopping stop” is a critical response to dealing with the rising price of fuel.

Americans don’t have the luxury of driving all over town to do their shopping.

Other than competing on prices and products, Duke said Wal-Mart is focused on leveraging technology — especially social networking — more aggressively to drive sales.

“Social networking is much more a part of the purchasing decision,” he said. “Consumers are communicating with each other on Facebook about how they spend their money and what they’re buying.”

Elsewhere, Duke said Wal-Mart is exploring a number of e-commerce initiatives to grow the business such as testing an online groceries delivery business in San Jose. To top of page

Back to the Well? – The Final Two Cents

There is a rather popular cliché that those who don’t know their history are doomed to repeat it. I tend to like the variation, that the only thing we have learned from history is that we have learned nothing from it. Sounds like a clever oxymoron, but given the state of affairs in the world today, it is more than apropos. It would seem that once again, we are defying logic and trying to go back to 2005 when it was all roses, honey, easy mortgages, and big trade deficits. Have we really not learned a thing?

Buried among yesterday’s headlines about Libya, oil, and the assertion that higher oil and gas prices don’t hurt the economy was a little noticed headline about Bridger Commercial Funding and how they were planning on scuttling the ship, so to speak, regarding commercial lending. On the surface this looks like a no-brainer. Sure, the market is weak, securitization is down, etc. Not so fast. If you dig into the second paragraph of the article, you find out WHY they’re getting out of the business – increased competition from megabanks. It gets better. The big Wall Street banks have decided that they are going to provide their own fuel for securitization of commercial loans by originating them themselves instead of relying on downstream providers. According to the Bloomberg article, roughly 20 to 25 players are now seeking regulatory approval to originate loans in the commercial space. This is a 25% increase from a year ago.

Commercial Real Estate Defaults

Amazingly all this action is happening even as demand for commercial loans remains tepid. Normally one would expect the general lack of demand for loans to drive players from the market as it is in the case of Bridger, not INTO the market as is the case of the 20-25 presently un-named institutions mentioned. Banks are only expected to securitize around $6.5 billion in commercial loans this year compared to $11.5 billion all of last year. Incidentally, this segment of the market peaked in 2007 with over $234 billion securitized. So why is everyone scrambling to get back into a market that is not even 10% of the size it was at its peak? Clearly there is either something amiss in the thinking of these institutions or else logic is once again failing.

Pump and Dump II?

We can clearly draw the conclusion that these arrogant drains on society have learned absolutely nothing from the past few years or we can draw the conclusion that they learned quite well and are back for another try at the excess leads to bailout game, opting to try to get in at the bottom and hoping the pump and dump works again. At this point I’m going to put an interesting spin on this to provide some food for thought. Back in 2006 when I first started blogging, I noted that the residential real estate bubble was nothing more than a property grab by the banks. The American people willingly gave themselves over to this by going in way over their heads on pretty much everything and losing a record amount of real estate in the process. The banks were dinged a bit in the form of credit card write-offs etc, but so what? They ran to Congress and told them the economy would collapse if they weren’t bailed out and Congress bought it hook, line, and sinker. Why not do it again? After all, America is apparently still hooked on shopping. Anywhere you look we continue to build more malls, shopping centers, and the like even while you can find empty commercial real estate almost anywhere you look. It is my opinion that at some point very soon, banks will own almost all of it. And we’ll have paid for it. All in the name of preserving the precious status quo because we were afraid of the day of reckoning.

Trade Deficits and ‘Prosperity’

Which brings us to the second point – the trade deficit. In reading the analysis of last month’s huge increase in the trade deficit to over $46 billion, the assertion was actually made that this is a good thing because the numbers indicate a healthy demand for imported goods. We still haven’t learned a thing. Of course, totally discounted in the report was the erosion of the dollar over the same period, which was notable. What also wasn’t noted was the effect of rapidly increasing energy prices on finished goods. Double that for increases in commodity prices in general. It is much the same as the situation with retail sales. Much emphasis is put on the headline numbers while little is done in the way of analyzing what the numbers actually mean or how they were derived.

Keynesian apologists love the big trade deficit because it indicates that the borrow- and-spend engine is getting revved up for another round. Maybe. Never do they look at the ability of the economy, particularly consumers, to support another round of excess. I wouldn’t go nearly as far as calling the consumer dead. The American consumer is like Sanka – good to the last drop, and will be around until it is absolutely impossible to remain. But we must wonder if consumer will be able to spend money at a rate that will cause another bubble to form with enough velocity and be of a large enough magnitude to keep the system afloat? More than likely, this endeavor will require additional rounds of QE by the Fed. Make no mistake about it – QE is now a permanent part of the discussion.

2010 Trade Deficit

Similarly, Keynesian apologists also love the concomitant decline in the Dollar because it helps inflate things like asset prices (the ‘good’ inflation), thereby supporting the idea that somehow all of this is a good thing. They are breathing a sigh of relief because their precious status quo has seemingly returned. The fact that so many people are paying attention to the debt is something they find offensive and annoying. After all, debt hasn’t mattered before, why should we be worried about it now?

And so it would seem we are back to 2005 and it is déjà vu all over again. There are, however, some significant differences between now and then. In 2005, there was little awareness and discussion about America’s debt levels, which were already very significant. As recently as 2006, the US fiscal gap was around $65 trillion – already a massive number. Now, just four and a half years later, the gap is more than 3 times that – and growing rapidly. Many would argue it is already beyond help. States are coming to grips with their own insolvency, and austerity, while not specifically mentioned yet, is already on the table in most areas. Foreign creditors have backed away from buying additional US debt and have been diversifying for several years now. This gap in demand has been filled by the Fed, first covertly, and now, overtly in the form of quantitative easing. Direct monetization. The end game common to all fiat currencies has begun. Our world is clearly not the same one we left back in 2005.

Since 2005, we’ve had one global financial meltdown, an oil shock, the European mess, and are working on our second oil shock and a food shock simultaneously. While our thinking and desires for respite may be stuck in 2005, our world is well past that.

This month’s Centsible Investor, due out March 15th, will take a detailed look at the situation with global food stocks, the agricultural markets, and the fundamental drivers in these critical areas. We’ll also provide specifics about how to get exposure to these areas both in and out of your paper portfolio. For more information about the newsletter or to subscribe, click here. We’re currently running a special for a one-year subscription as well. Don’t miss it!

The Recovery That Never Was

It is my belief that as the headlines continue to roll in about fiscal woes from sea to shining sea that we are going to get a full appreciation for the fraud that has been perpetrated on the American people in the form of the ‘economic recovery’ that the media has been stumping for since the middle of 2009. This ‘wag the dog’ type undertaking has been about confidence, perceptions, and little else. Absolutely, there are pockets of the nation where people have found work. After all, when your government dumps nearly a trillion dollars into the economy it is going to have SOME effect. Our goal from the beginning of these hyperstimulation maneuvers was to point out the unsustainability of this course of action and more importantly to predict the consequences thereof.

Is .4% really that big of a deal?

This morning, the Commerce Department revised its GDP estimate for the fourth quarter of 2010 by .4% to the downside. That in and of itself is certainly not newsworthy, but the reasons given for the downward revision most certainly are. For the first time in quite a while, the government and the media are actually allowing the light of truth to shine into government reporting. One of the biggest reasons (which has been included in many headlines) is that cuts in state government spending are largely responsible for the cut in GDP. So what, that is common sense isn’t it? It will be, but let’s analyze. I’ve talked many times about how GDP numbers have been overstated because they included government spending that comes from borrowed money. While those discussions generally focused on the federal government, this includes the states too. The states issue debt in the form of general obligation and specific bonds to do much of their spending since they, like the federal government, are largely insolvent. This spent borrowed money counts in GDP the same as a dollar spent that had been kept in savings. The thesis proposed months ago was a simple one; the states are going into extremis and when they do, down goes GDP. Double that for the federal government.

This is one of the biggest reasons that no one in Washington really wants to cut government spending, putting the rhetoric aside. They all know that if they were to cut a trillion dollars from the federal budget that GDP would fall by around 1/14th and we’d have an instant depression. Yet at the same time, a trillion dollar cut in spending is exactly what needs to happen along with a bevy of program reforms; and that is just for starters. Hopefully this gives you a better appreciation of the predicament we’re in as a nation. This is one of the reasons I think politicians are taking up the stance that they agree cuts need to be made, but can’t agree on which ones. This will give them all political cover to maintain the status quo thereby cutting essentially nothing, while making much in the way of fanfare over insignificant token cuts. The idea of shutting down the government and its massive entitlement system has already been floated to scare people into pressuring their leaders into maintaining the status quo. Stay tuned; it gets better.

Chaste Consumers?

Consumers also did not escape blame for the lack of more vigorous ‘growth’. Spending had originally been thought to have increased at a 4.4% annualized rate. It turns out spending likely only increased at 4.1%. Bad consumers! From our good friend Jeannine at AP:

“Consumers spent a little less than first thought. Their spending rose at a rate of 4.1 percent, slightly smaller than the initial estimate of 4.4 percent. Still, it was the best showing since 2006. And it suggests Americans will play a larger role this year in helping the economy grow, especially with more money from a Social Security tax cut.”

Talk about opinion shaping. This should be another indicator that nobody is really intent on fixing anything. While I am all in favor of a tax cut, one without reform seems rather obtuse, especially given the fact that Social Security is already in the red and busted out beyond description in terms of its unfunded promises. The program needs a massive overhaul, not insipid palliatives.

What cannot be left alone in the above press line is the suggestion that consumers are going to lift the economy in such a Herculean manner. First of all, let’s get it straight that much of the ‘gain’ in consumer spending (as measured by retail sales) came from the fact that consumers are paying more for food and gasoline and, sadly, have increased their debt burdens slightly to do so. More unsustainability.

To demonstrate this, I’ll show a couple of charts; the first is the slight, but significant increase in consumer credit followed by the steady increases in both food and energy prices throughout all of 2010:

Consumer Credit Outstanding

Now let’s get a better idea of where at least a portion of those borrowed dollars went – first food and beverage prices:

Food Price Increases

Now, for energy…

Consumers paying more for staple goods doesn’t constitute economic growth, yet this is exactly what the Keynesian deficit-lovers would have you believe. And we know the CPI is in most cases grossly understating the real increases, but at least you now have a visualization of the issue. It may very well be that this next boom in consumer indebtedness comes more from necessity rather than greed and avarice. With the labor market still incredibly soft, and thousands of discouraged workers falling out of the BLS counts each month, the credit card is the only place many people will be able to fill the gap.

Further anecdotal evidence that supports the notion that this ‘recovery’ was nearly entirely a contrived event (thanks to borrowed government money and increasing prices of finished goods) is the housing market. Home prices have continued to drop despite the frantic calls of ‘bottom’ from market analysts, hopeful professional associations like NAR, and the mainstream press. Foreclosures continue to mount and even CNBC got on the bandwagon a few weeks back reporting that around 11% of all homes in the US are now sitting empty. A genuine bottom up fix would have corrected many of these problems. Spending a trillion dollars to rebuild our manufacturing base would have created jobs beyond those necessary to do the building. It would have employed people on an ongoing basis, miraculously converting bad debts into good ones. Instead we chose to do a top-down fix, lavishing trillions of dollars on banks, brokerages, and lobbyists in the hope that a few bucks might find their way to Joe Q. Public. It reeks of too much textbook and too little practicality.

The recovery that never was is over. Continuation of the current state of affairs will result in further debt accumulation by a system that is ready to disintegrate on its own weight. Assuming the consumer can step in and spend up where even state governments leave off is an absurd idea. Assuming they can fill the black hole left by a gutted and fiscally impotent federal government is laughable.

What Economics is NOT

It is starting again. It is a phenomenon that occurs more regularly now, especially with daily talk of massive imbalances right along with a massive boost in activity. More and more people are scratching their heads wondering what gives. Once again, economics has become a debating society. There are Keynesians, Austrians, the Classic folks, and those who will use ridiculous rationale and textbook, but not applicable accounting definitions to try to assert that we’re really getting rich every time the government borrows another dollar. It is no wonder people are confused. Like so many other areas of our society, particularly morality, the definitions have been skewed, the lines, blurred, and the waters made muddy.

I am not going to sit here and explain the difference between the schools of economic thought because it isn’t necessary. I’m not going to sit here and tell you what you already know, because you already know it. What I am going to do is spend a few minutes giving you some good reasons why you should follow the laws of economics and tune out the nonsense from politicians, the pundits, and the bank-financed media.

Economics is not a debating society. There are laws. These laws are immutable. This is not just my opinion; rather, it is a fact that has been borne out time and time again throughout history. Obey the laws of economics and you will fare well; cross them and you’re in trouble. The biggest caveat in all of this is that the punishments are often not immediate. If you put your hand on a hot stove you’ll know instantly the consequences of your actions. The same goes for jumping in a cold lake in the middle of January. However, when it comes to money and economics, it is often possible, and very normal, to get away with bad behavior for a time. This is dangerous because people often forget that their proverbial hand is an inch above the hot stove.

Econ 101

This is precisely the point we are at in the progression of America and most of the world. Our hand is an inch above the stove and we’re clueless because we’ve gotten away with breaking the laws of economics long enough that we are convinced that we have a free pass and can continue our behavior in perpetuity. We look at our television sets and the massive social unrest in other parts of the world and feel insulated because we live in America. We’re watching others partake in the negative consequences of violating the laws of economics yet we’re secure in the naïve notion that it can’t happen here.

It is a simple law of economics that if you consume more than you produce that you’re going to become poor, not rich. Our government and media would have you believe the exact opposite and so many of you have tried it their way and lost badly. Think of the family who month after month consumes beyond their production. They go into debt and become a slave to the creditor. They become destitute, insolvent, and eventually go bankrupt. It is happening all the time. Why is a nation any different? It isn’t. Sure, a nation has more resources than the individual to kick the can down the road a little longer, but in the end, the result is the same. The law has been violated and the consequence awaits.

Bankruptcies

Wealth doesn’t come from a printing press or a credit card. This is another intellectual fraud that has been perpetrated on people the globe over. Wealth is a result of work, foregoing of consumption, and investment of the resultant savings. Notice it starts with work, not Bernanke’s printing press or VISA. We earn a living from the sweat of our brow, not by being wards of the government printing press. We have been told the exact opposite though. We’ve been told that we’re prosperous even while our debts balloon. We’ve been told we have a healthy economic recovery without putting the unemployed back to work. These claims are fraudulent and should be ignored.

We’ve also been conditioned to believe that we are exempt from the consequences of economic malfeasance because we issue the world’s reserve currency. This is another prevarication. First of all, the Dollar is not issued by the US government, the people of America, or any other American institution. The Dollar is issued by a privately owned, privately held corporation that has its own best interests in mind, not America’s. And even if the US Treasury did issue the Dollar and there was no Fed, it still would not cloak us in immunity from a sound economic beating for over issuing currency and spreading inflation around the world.

We did get a little bit of truth from Mr. Ben a few weeks back when he was asked about near record high global food prices and what affects quantitative easing (another fraud) was having in the commodities markets. Ben answered, essentially admitting that QE has been holding up our financial markets. QE is just another tool being used to kick the can down the road and push the consequences of our poor decisions another day into the future when another Congress and another generation will have to deal with it. And guess what? They won’t be any better equipped to handle it than we are today. They won’t be any smarter. The only real thing we’ve learned from history is that we don’t learn from history. Our best hope at dealing with our economic problems is now, on both a personal level and in the aggregate.

Economics is not some Pandora’s black box of evil-looking equations, charts, and terms that are not meant to be understood. On the surface all you really need to know is what has been stated in the past two pages. The laws of economics are common sense. Sure, we can get detailed in trying to explain and analyze that common sense, but the explanations are not economics, the common sense is. Keep that in mind as you follow what is going on and make decisions in your own life.

The New Humpty Dumpty

Published on: 01/28/2011
Comments: No Comments

Irony is a wonderful thing sometimes. It has a habit of framing things exactly the way they need to be framed. Unfortunately, this is a knife that cuts both ways and irony sometimes points out awful realities. I am not a political animal per se, but I find it incredibly ironic how the avalanche of bad news on the deficit, Social Security, and essentially most of the things wrong with our economy was saved until after Tuesday’s SOTU speech. Make no mistake, this has happened before, and each time I find the timing to be absolutely incredible. It is very clear at least at this point that our leaders prefer to pay lip service to the idea of reducing the deficit rather than actually trying to rectify the situation. I say this because, with very few exceptions, the rhetoric centers around a silver bullet solution that will allow programs and spending to remain pretty much on the same path as what got us here, but at the same time, ‘fixing’ things.

We are learning a very hard lesson that it isn’t always about what you make, but what you spend. For all the talk about decreased Federal tax revenues, one would think that alone would command lower spending. Not so as we once again flirt with the statutory debt limit on the largest credit card in the world. For many years we depended on the world to absorb these excesses, selling trillions in Treasury bonds to the four corners of the Earth. Now that engine is stalling (quickly) and the Federal Reserve has stepped in to pick up the slack and even their overt monetization has not changed the tone in Washington with regard to debt. It certainly gives credence to the argument made by many non-mainstream economists that the problem of debt is already too big to be fixed. We are sitting on the world’s biggest Humpty Dumpty. Let’s take a look for a few minutes at some of the updates on the worsening fiscal front.

Social Security in the Red

This wasn’t supposed to happen until 2016. And I remember when that prediction came out that it was considered a ‘worst case’ date. Amazingly, the early descent into insolvency is now being blamed on the economy rather than horrible actuarial prognostications and the lack of political will to remedy the situation when something still could have been done.

“The massive retirement program has been suffering from the effects of the struggling economy for several years. It first went into deficit last year but had been projected to post surpluses for a few more years before permanently slipping into the red in 2016.” – AP

This gargantuan program will be $45 billion in the hole during 2011, but we should rest assured. Congress has pledged to replace revenues lost from the recently passed tax cuts. This stance alone is prima facie evidence that our leaders are clueless. IF Congress had a piggy bank of savings, then we could at least only be forced to ask how long it would take to eat up the savings. But Humpty Dumpty has no savings. Humpty is flat broke. So to read this correctly, what it means is that Congress will have the Federal Reserve monetize whatever revenue shortfalls occur from the tax cuts and then plug the borrowed dollars back into Social Security and everything will be fine. This is the type of ridiculous nonsense that passes for leadership today – from BOTH parties. And we wonder why no one wants to buy our bonds?

The Irresistible Force versus the Immovable Object

In what has been called a game of chicken recently, the Treasury is once again running out of room with regard to the statutory debt limit. Each time it gets about 6 months from hitting the ceiling the Treasury Secy. goes hat in hand to Congress, usually in the form of a letter, explaining that yes, they need to up the limit on the national credit card. No, we can’t stop spending because if we do, GDP will collapse.. Yes, you’ll need to raise this ceiling again in the near future because you won’t raise it enough this time.. No, Dr. Paul, you can’t fire me.. And that is about how it goes. Generally after a good deal of political posturing, Congress raises the limit saying they have no choice and that the world will end if the limit is not raised. But we are going to tackle spending now that the debt ceiling has been raised and this time we mean it (with thumping of fists).

Normally this wouldn’t even be worth writing about because it is so commonplace, however, this time things are a tad different. A whole bunch of new Congressfolks have been sworn in and some of them are having their feet held to the fire on spending and are balking at granting another increase. They’re demanding specific and defined spending cuts before another increase in the ceiling is given. I have no doubt that they will in fact increase the ceiling before the deadline, but it is kind of humorous to watch the Treasury scramble to re-arrange its deck chairs.

However, there is a very interesting tidbit in here. I’ve asked Martin Crutsinger, the AP author of this piece for clarification, but have not gotten and don’t expect an answer. Note the following:

“Treasury officials said that starting next week they will gradually decrease the $200 billion the government has borrowed in a special program conducted for the Federal Reserve, lowering that amount to around $5 billion.

That will provide the government with an extra $195 billion that it can devote to its regular borrowing needs.”

What I’d like to know is what ‘special program’ the Treasury is running for the Fed at a $200 Billion cost to the taxpayer? I would say the Fed has plenty of its own money. It certainly has plenty when it is time to buy FFF- bonds from Wall Street. It certainly has plenty of money when it is time to setup emergency facilities to bail out its owners. Yes you read that right – its owners. I’d love to know why the US taxpayer is having another $200 Billion borrowed on its behalf to do ANYTHING for the Fed.

Japan – Where Debt Matters?

I have often joked with clients and subscribers about the ratings agencies here in the US. Whether it was taking ridiculous subprime mortgage tranches and slapping an AAA rating on them for resale, the same type of occurrence in the commercial RE market, or the constant, but never delivered upon threats to downgrade the USGoverment’s credit rating, S&P and Moody’s have earned themselves quite a distinction of being ratings agencies for hire.

However, when it comes to Japan, the rating cut was swift and decisive. S&P cut Japan to 4 notches below that of the US this week making the island nation government’s credit rating the same as China’s. This is laughable in and of itself considering that China is the lender to the world. What is even more hilarious is the fact that S&P still assigns the US Government a pristine AAA rating. It gets better.

The stated reason for the cut of Japan’s rating was its debt load. Its budget deficit is roughly 200% of GDP, which essentially means that Japan borrows $2 for every $1 of economic activity. Obviously, this is an awful situation and has been persistently blamed on deflation, which has had the country firmly in its grip for over a decade now. Japan’s total debt load is roughly $11 Trillion.

A sane person would properly ask how the US can maintain a AAA rating given that our national debt is $14 Trillion and that using Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, our fiscal gap is well over $200 Trillion. S&P would have you believe that it is because America’s budget deficit at $1.5 Trillion is only a tad over 10% of GDP. That isn’t entirely accurate. When GDP is calculated (and yes, we’ve done this before), it includes all government spending – even the borrowed dollars. So FY2011’s total GDP will count the $1.5 trillion that was borrowed and spent, plus whatever else was spent. When we hold the budget to the GAAP standard, the actual deficit gets much larger due to the accrued unfunded liabilities. That is also not counted in the deficit/GDP ratio. FY2010’s deficit was somewhere in the neighborhood of 40-45% of GDP when the numbers are looked at honestly. Granted this is not Japan’s 200%, but one would think that given our larger total stated debt and massive fiscal gap, this would be good for at least a single tier cut. Nope. The rating agencies have lost all credibility because it is obvious that their ratings in many cases are geopolitically driven.

When we take a look at these factors and ask whether we are closer to the beginning than to the end of the debt crisis, the answer can only be that we haven’t even started. The vast majority in leadership positions and the media are still trying to convince the American people that we need to cut the deficit, but can do so without laying even a finger on the sacrosanct welfare state programs namely Social Security and it’s insolvent cousin Medicare. We have recently been told that the only way to cut the deficit is to spend more money. If we were going to spend that on building a productive economic base, I would be in agreement. But we aren’t planning on doing that at all. We appear to only be interested in kicking the can down the road.

Another Consequence of Zero Rates

Over the past two years, I have visited the topic of the consequences of our new zero rate world on several occasions. Despite media ramblings about ‘free’ money stimulating the economy and igniting another 2005-esque period of time, there have been several very negative consequences. Obviously, pathetic rates of return on what are traditionally referred to, as ‘risk-free’ assets are one well-understood development. There are others. This week we’ll take a look at the specter of zero-rates from a risk management perspective and demonstrate exactly how much our world has changed. Perhaps, ironically, the news is not all bad; there is a bit of a silver lining in here!

The ‘Pre-Crash’ World

It was not uncommon as recently as 2006 or so to be able to put together a portfolio of equities, a few bonds, and some open or closed end funds and easily target a double-digit yield. Keep in mind that was just the yield and did not count for capital appreciation. When I penned the pilot issue of our Centsible Investor in November of 2007 (coincident with the market top), the yield on the first firm analyzed was 14.87%. I remember it like it was yesterday. The standard deviation (a measure of volatility) on the same firm was 18%, which was fairly representative of the volatility of the S&P500. The yield on the 10-Year Treasury Note was around 4.36%, and a 1-Year CD was bringing around 4.5%. Designing a portfolio with a target yield of 8-10% was easy and could be done without taking on a lot of risk.

One question I want everyone to consider before reading any further is: has it gotten any cheaper to live your life since then? I ask this because common Mediaspeak will have you believe that the cost of living has dropped significantly since then and as such it is ok that a good yield is about as hard to find as an honest politician. Clearly, if your cost of living has stayed the same, the precipitous drop in yields has caused you hardship at a bare minimum.

Interest Rates Plunge!

Before & After

Let’s take a 10-asset model portfolio and analyze it over several periods and demonstrate what has transpired. For our factor of comparison we’ll use the DJ Total Market Index (Aka Wilshire 5000). The composition of the ‘model’ is three Canadian Energy Trusts, three non-US fixed income closed-end funds, a US Bond ETF, and three global high-dividend paying closed-end funds.

'Model' Portfolio

From January 1, 2000 through November 30, 2007, the vitals on this model were as follows:

Risk-Free Rate: 4.5%

Average Yield: 8.9%

Standard Deviation: 11.17%

Expected Return beyond the Risk-Free Rate: 3.5%

Portfolio Beta: .28

It is obvious from the above that this ten asset model was well-diversified, and performed quite well despite the bear market of the early part of the decade even though there were 3 losers out of 10 during the 7 year period. From a capital appreciation standpoint, the model didn’t grow all that much, but it certainly produced good income along the way.

Model Volatility

Now let’s take a look at the same 10-asset model from December 1, 2007 through the present. We’ll use the same factor (Wilshire 5000), and will change only the risk free rate, which we’ll set at 1% to reflect the current rate picture. Here are the particulars:

Risk-Free Rate: 1.0%

Average Yield: 4.78%

Standard Deviation: 29.21%

Expected Return beyond the Risk-Free Rate: .79%

Portfolio Beta: .77

Obviously aside from the decrease in yield is the increase in portfolio volatility. Not only that, but the principal took quite a beating as well and finally recovered in January of 2010. This assumes that the investor chose to ride out the storm and didn’t take any evasive moves, choosing to continue collecting dividends.

Model Volatility

I understand that this period obviously includes the 2008-2009 panic, but the point is a simple one. The individual who was quietly invested for the first part of the decade had the rug yanked out from under them. The investor who could have lived very nicely from the dividends alone resulting from a $500,000 portfolio has suddenly had to dip into an already shrunken principal to continue the same standard of living.

And perhaps the most important thing, our hypothetical investor is taking on MUCH more risk and experiencing more volatility for a significantly lower return.

An Unlikely Parallel

Let’s now present a second ‘model’, this one consisting of 10 preferred stocks. I’ve mentioned preferreds before and many people eschewed them since they don’t generally provide the same opportunities for capital appreciation as common stock. Yet, in a discussion about income, preferreds definitely have their place. Generally, preferred shares are thought to be lower yielding (more conservative in nature), which has generally been true. Let’s see what’s happened in the past few years though. Our preferred model consists of all preferreds, the DJ Total Market Index (Wilshire 5000) as the factor for comparison, and a risk-free rate of 1.0%. 6 of the preferreds are utility firms, 2 are multinational manufacturing, one is a pharma company, and there is one food company.

Risk-Free Rate: 1.0%

Average Yield: 6.44%

Standard Deviation: 11.53%

Expected Return beyond the Risk-Free Rate: 9.01%

Portfolio Beta: .21

What is amazing is that the preferreds, with their vanilla, conservative reputation, are outperforming the dividend ‘achievers’ over the past three years, and doing it with roughly 30% of the volatility. Incredible isn’t it?

Preferred Model Volatility

While the above reality has certainly been present for quite some time, it is amazing how many folks who are active in investing and the financial world still haven’t caught on to the change in paradigm. It has been over three years since the Dow peaked in late 2007. This is certainly not meant to serve as a knock against anyone, but rather to point out that as people, we are creatures of habit and that old habits die hard. An old cliché is that fortune favors the bold, but I would submit that in this case, maybe fortune just happens to favor those who know where to look.

2011 To-Do List

Published on: 12/31/2010
Comments: 1 Comment

Many people I’ve spoken with over the past 6 months or so have expressed extreme dissatisfaction with their individual and/or collective ability to affect change in government. Sure, there have been some small victories here and there, but by and large our biggest problems continue to rage on unabated. For quite some time I shared in their frustration, and still do, but have realized that sometimes the actions of the masses need to take place on a different level to change the bigger paradigms. To use some old adages, we shouldn’t throw stones from a glass house, and we should certainly tend to our own backyard before criticizing that of our neighbor. On this last day of 2010, let’s take a look at what we can do in our own financial lives to improve our situations. Let’s call it trickle-up responsibility.

Stop Accumulating Additional Debt

Obviously, this one seems like a no-brainer, but let’s hit it from a few unconventional angles. First of all, it is important to understand that debt is one of the biggest ways the banking system creates inflation. The money multiplier, aka fractional reserve ratio, determines how much banks actually need to keep in their coffers to meet withdrawal requests by depositors. The rest can be out in the system in the form of loans, speculative investments, and the like. Let’s use an example. You to go the bank and deposit $100. The bank can create roughly $1000 in loans off that $100. In that sense, the bank has created inflation by inventing money from your deposit. Perhaps one of the biggest misconceptions in this dawning age of awareness of the Federal Reserve and what it does is that the Fed is solely responsible for inflation. While the Fed does set the multiplier, the Fed itself does not create much of the inflation we experience. That is done in the banking system by creation of ~10X loans from deposits.

With this in mind, each time you take on additional debt, you are helping the banking system to create inflation, which erodes the purchasing power of the money you just borrowed plus all your other funds. This is why there has been such a big problem over the past two years and Bernanke et al are trying to scare the public about deflation. People weren’t borrowing enough to allow inflation to occur. Wonder of all wonders, we have actually undergone a period of deflation (contraction in M3), and the Fed, banks, and government just can’t have that. Why? Because they know that a fiat monetary system needs inflation like human beings need oxygen.

Who caused that period of deflation? The government and banking elite would have you believe that it was bad loans and falling home prices. WRONG. If you’d like proof of that, take a minute and read the My Two Cents from 10/10/2008. It was you – the American people – that did it by living responsibly for a time. You did it by foregoing on consumption and additional borrowing. You didn’t do it by having rallies, you didn’t do it by demonstrating, you didn’t do it by waving signs. You did it by making smart financial decisions at kitchen tables from sea to shining sea. That is the dirty secret those in charge of the banking system and the upper levels of government don’t want known.

This is another reason why the government has undertaken so much borrowing. It is not to stimulate the economy as we’ve already seen. Many of you have expressed frustration about the trillions spent on ‘stimulus’ with nearly nothing to show for it. The above facts are precisely the reason why this is the case. The government stepped in to save first the banking system, then the fiat money system itself by borrowing on your behalf. Many people have already caught on to this reality. Those are the priorities of the government. The financial system and the money system must be preserved because that is where actual political power is derived in the current paradigm. This is another reason why governments promote entitlement societies. They assist in preserving the fiat paradigm and at the same time gathering control over the citizenry.

The past two years of credit contraction and lack of additional accumulated debt by the American people have been a major thorn in the side of those who benefit from the fiat paradigm. This is why there has been a massive media and propaganda campaign to convince people that the economy is on the mend and that we should get out and spend money. It is why George Bush told the American people to go to Disney World, and it is why we continue to dump billions into continuing unemployment benefits rather than bringing jobs back home and finding ways to create sustainable employment for the unemployed. It is why banks continue to send pre-approved credit card applications to people who haven’t had jobs in 2 years. I personally know of at least two dozen situations where this is the case and I’m sure there are millions more out there.

Simply put, we’re analyzing the actions of the banks and government from a ‘good of the people’ perspective where they are acting from a ‘good of the fiat paradigm’ perspective. That is why nothing makes sense. Keep up the good work on eliminating debt accumulation; you’re doing a fantastic job!

Make Others Aware and Encourage Similar Action

On its face, the above heading may seem like the tripe that often comes out of futile movements, but as we’ve seen above, in the case of debt, what has happened has actually been working. People need to use every opportunity to make others around them aware of this reality. I understand that much of the contraction of debt accumulation has been forced on people by job loss and/or reduction in earnings. Economic realities often precipitate necessary actions and this is no exception. The key now is to continue the trend. And that will only happen if more individuals and families are recruited and encouraged to join the effort. And it costs nothing to join.

It is sad to think of the millions of Americans that have lived their entire adult lives with the burden of debt hanging like a millstone around their necks. It is even sadder when you begin to realize that much of it wasn’t necessary. I have a saying that I am quite sure someone else came up with, but it is very appropriate. It isn’t what you make, it is what you spend, and in this case what you borrow to spend. It has gotten us in trouble as individuals, as families, as counties, as states, and as a nation. While we might not be able to order Washington and Wall Street to represent us and dispense with this phony monetary paradigm, we can make it difficult if not impossible for them to continue it.

Obviously there are consequences for any course of action. Good ones and bad ones. In the case of debt, the positive consequences are freedom and peace of mind, not to mention saving all that money on interest payments. The negative consequences are that the Fed and USGovt will do their level best to pick up where you left off. Our government will borrow like it has never borrowed before and the Fed will buy more bonds. It might have to buy them all eventually. And so it will proceed until the fiat paradigm ends. It will end. It always has and always will. It is one of the immutable laws of economics given to us by God. As in all prior historical examples, it will not end well. There will be turbulence and dark times. That also is the way of things. Radical change in societies and paradigms never happens quietly. These transitions tend to follow another famous adage that those who play with fire tend to eventually get burned.

There is good news though. While all of this flux continues to transpire, you can do whatever is within your means to positively impact your situation in this regard. This much I will tell you: not only will it feel good and put more money in your pocket, you’ll sleep better at night as a result of it. Please accept my best wishes for a Happy New Year and may you be blessed in your efforts to become debt-free.

« page 2 of 8 »

Welcome , today is Thursday, 02/09/2012